Around the NFL
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,424
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 338 times
- Received High Fives: 863 times
Around the NFL
No clue where to post some stuff not necessarily team related but could be? Feel free to delete if this belongs somewhere else.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,652
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1390 times
That may have been agent trying to fake interest. Tyreek is probably done as a major contributor after those surgeries.
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,753
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1904 times
- Received High Fives: 1177 times
Correct, supposedly there have been negotiations with KC even prior to their wideouts getting injured.
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,042
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2054 times
- Received High Fives: 2762 times
Given his reputation as an unwilling blocker, it doesn't seem like a good fit with Kubiak.Jeevo wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:25 am Apparently the Cardinals are trading MHJ, and are holding him out of tomorrow’s game. We’ll see who the, er lucky?, winner is.
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
- FLORIDARAYDAH, Jeevo, SkullCrusher
- raiderjohn
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1 time
- Received High Fives: 119 times
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,424
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 338 times
- Received High Fives: 863 times
- raiders93
- Posts: 5,060
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
- Has given High Fives: 8 times
- Received High Fives: 256 times
Right now the Texans seem like the front runner. Naturally we’re going to be involved in almost every rumour mill involving big name receivers. Seems like a stroud reunion in Houston is the most likely movechucker wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:43 am Given his reputation as an unwilling blocker, it doesn't seem like a good fit with Kubiak.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1237 times
- Received High Fives: 2965 times
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,136
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 496 times
- Received High Fives: 212 times
Jesus Christ. Talk about moving goal posts. That’s all you’ve done. By putting words in my mouth (ie lying) &, then not even responding to my main reasonings. All you’ve done is ignore everything you didn’t wanna contend with.mranquales wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2026 4:35 pm Originally, you typed, "early pick". Now you've finally added clarity on what you meant. Granted, this can be considering moving the goal posts, but I'll engage the topic anyway.
Top half of the first round, that's a much better assessment, but it's still incorrect. K9, James Cook and Derrick Henry are the only backs that would qualify while also being good enough to compare to the others. However, the majority of the best RBs in the NFL were drafted in the top half of the first round.
RBs in this new era are a PREMIUM position, and you are much more likely to get one by spending a top pick. Also, I want to be clear that I consider any pick in the top 50 an "early" pick (as well as most analysts). Hell, I don't see how someone can debate any pick in the first round being anything other than an "early" pick, but I digress.
Maybe a better question would be, who in Jeanty's class should have been drafted instead of him? Because I see Jeanty as the best RB in his class (even though I personally wanted Gordon).
I’m not gonna engage with you any further on this since, you can’t discuss it genuinely. We can just move along
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,136
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 496 times
- Received High Fives: 212 times
I thought they would be in play. They definitely need one. Thought Colts &, NE as well but, they’ve already spent some capital on Sauce/AJ so, would they on MHJ? 9ers but, they don’t seem like a team to trade for MHJ.
I’d want Raiders to trade for him but, definitely not for their asking price. A 2nd…yeah right. I wouldn’t even a 3rd at this point tho, that would be more stomach-able. Plus, I’d only after having a talk with him &, knowing that he’d rededicate himself 100% to football/the team. Cause he for sure is lacking effort, big time.
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,853
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 414 times
- Received High Fives: 794 times
I’d be disappointed if it was us. Supposedly they wanted a 2nd plus something else but if I were them I’d pray that someone offers a 3rd.chucker wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2026 8:43 am Given his reputation as an unwilling blocker, it doesn't seem like a good fit with Kubiak.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
- FLORIDARAYDAH, raider_kin, Opoponax50
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,424
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 338 times
- Received High Fives: 863 times
I don’t want it to be us or the Chiefs(just in case) but according to the sources both teams don’t want the trade announced until they play this weekend and KC doesn’t play this weekend.
- SkullCrusher
- Posts: 12,015
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 484 times
- Received High Fives: 624 times
I wonder what you have to give up to have Harrison?
Imo your betting on one thing... did he sit on the cards because he didn't want to play there?
I'm only interested in the answer is yes and you know that as fact and you know he's all in coming here.
Otherwise he was a no-show for the NFL, what would be different here or anywhere?
Imo your betting on one thing... did he sit on the cards because he didn't want to play there?
I'm only interested in the answer is yes and you know that as fact and you know he's all in coming here.
Otherwise he was a no-show for the NFL, what would be different here or anywhere?
- These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post (total 2):
- MexicanHulk, mranquales
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1237 times
- Received High Fives: 2965 times
If he played like ass because he did not want to be there, I have zero interest in the guy. I would not give up a toaster for that shitSkullCrusher wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2026 10:27 am I wonder what you have to give up to have Harrison?
Imo your betting on one thing... did he sit on the cards because he didn't want to play there?
I'm only interested in the answer is yes and you know that as fact and you know he's all in coming here.
Otherwise he was a no-show for the NFL, what would be different here or anywhere?
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 5):
- Hellbound, raider_kin, ELCAraiderfan, Opoponax50, Dr Death
-
Hellbound
- Posts: 6,734
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 1038 times
Lol...let's tweet breaking news and then not name the other team involved in the trade