2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderFan1
Posts: 1,568
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:30 am
Has given High Fives: 144 times
Received High Fives: 116 times

2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Unread post by RaiderFan1 »

Obvious Mendoza #1 no consideration of trading that pick.
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.

#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.

#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.

Sounds like solid gets

Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there

Who else you like ?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

WNYRAIDER wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:31 am .....I know that right tackle seems the bigger uncertainty at the moment, but Miller is increasingly less likely to get through a season at left tackle, and we are at the point where drafting his potential replacement has to be a thought. ...even if it is a guy with all of the tools, but' is raw',for whatever reason, whether having outgrown TE or whatever, and we take a shot at him not with our highest picks, but perhaps with one of those 4th rounders....
Why? That's exactly what we did last year with Grant in the 3rd round. He should be groomed for LT.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
chucker
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,327
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1062 times
Received High Fives: 584 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

haji81872 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 7:47 am lv_draft_1774104364809.png

Have to say, I love this draft.

I LOVE trading down and still getting Pregnon (BPA and position of need). I would be happy just getting him at 36.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,035
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2042 times
Received High Fives: 2751 times

Unread post by chucker »

WNYRAIDER wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:31 am .....I know that right tackle seems the bigger uncertainty at the moment, but Miller is increasingly less likely to get through a season at left tackle, and we are at the point where drafting his potential replacement has to be a thought. ...even if it is a guy with all of the tools, but' is raw',for whatever reason, whether having outgrown TE or whatever, and we take a shot at him not with our highest picks, but perhaps with one of those 4th rounders....
You just described a guy who was never going to get any real playing time as a rookie and needs developing. Yet we drafted that guy last year in Grant and now, after a year of development time when he was never expected to contribute, you seem to have forgotten that he needed to develop.

It's almost like Spytek knew what he was doing last year when he drafted Grant and Rogers.

We need to draft olinemen every year, but we need to let them develop and not forget about them. We're a better constructed team now because we drafted Grant and Rogers last year.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 5):
BoKnows81, Raiders Baby, Trainnvain, Hellbound, tadow
User avatar
Raiders Baby
Posts: 3,120
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:54 am
Has given High Fives: 303 times
Received High Fives: 89 times

Unread post by Raiders Baby »

Without being in the building, and just assessing this as an “on paper” situation, my ideal solution for the OL is:

Draft Blake Miller at 36 to start immediately at RT.

Start Kolton at LT, and continue to develop Charles Grant to be the LT of the future.

Aside from Kolton, the rest of the line is young, so if Grant is the real deal, we won’t have to worry about OL for a little while.

If Grant isn’t good, we will still have to draft a LT at some point, but the rest of the OL will be complete.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

chucker wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 6:12 am You just described a guy who was never going to get any real playing time as a rookie and needs developing. Yet we drafted that guy last year in Grant and now, after a year of development time when he was never expected to contribute, you seem to have forgotten that he needed to develop.

It's almost like Spytek knew what he was doing last year when he drafted Grant and Rogers.

We need to draft olinemen every year, but we need to let them develop and not forget about them. We're a better constructed team now because we drafted Grant and Rogers last year.
i agree on oline, every draft you gotta take a few of em, oline guys need to develop and improve over a yr or 2 before they shine this is also a position that needs to stay fresh and have quality depth
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 820 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

haji81872 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 7:37 pm RB are a dime a dozen, pick up an UDFA. A kicker? We have two. OUr developmetal QB is Mendoza.

There is no such thing as drafting too many linemen.
Just curious who the other kicker is? Gay is one.
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

Trainnvain wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 5:31 am I think the Raiders accomplished this already when they drafted Grant- a guy with all the tools but raw, who needs development.
... maybe, it is hard sometimes to remember how little we know about some of those guys we recently drafted, and many of us likes the picks when taken, due to Pete not playing them, and his kid being a.....
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

chucker wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 6:12 am You just described a guy who was never going to get any real playing time as a rookie and needs developing. Yet we drafted that guy last year in Grant and now, after a year of development time when he was never expected to contribute, you seem to have forgotten that he needed to develop.

It's almost like Spytek knew what he was doing last year when he drafted Grant and Rogers.

We need to draft olinemen every year, but we need to let them develop and not forget about them. We're a better constructed team now because we drafted Grant and Rogers last year.

....yeah, I forget sometimes that we liked these guys when we picked them, and then they sort of seem out of sight, out of mind, due to the last regime being what they were....

...and to be honest, I have never seen as few of our games as I did last year, due to various net challenges...
User avatar
Trainnvain
Posts: 1,431
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
Has given High Fives: 242 times
Received High Fives: 172 times

Unread post by Trainnvain »

WNYRAIDER wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 9:59 am ... maybe, it is hard sometimes to remember how little we know about some of those guys we recently drafted, and many of us likes the picks when taken, due to Pete not playing them, and his kid being a.....
We may not be able to gauge the progress but I am pretty confident the strategy was to draft a high upside talent to develop
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

I would prioritize a guard if all things are equal. LT will need consideration at some point, but we do have Miller. I know he got dinged up the last couple years, but past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Bottom line, we need to let the draft come to us and not force the draft. It is like saying we need to draft a developmental QB somewhere in the draft and that is absolutely false. We need to draft players who are the best option each time we are up. Teams that focus on a position over the best player are going to suffer each and every year.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:34 am I would prioritize a guard if all things are equal. LT will need consideration at some point, but we do have Miller. I know he got dinged up the last couple years, but past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Bottom line, we need to let the draft come to us and not force the draft. It is like saying we need to draft a developmental QB somewhere in the draft and that is absolutely false. We need to draft players who are the best option each time we are up. Teams that focus on a position over the best player are going to suffer each and every year.
Who are you playing at RT?
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:35 am Who are you playing at RT?
Grant should get every chance at the job. I am more concerned with getting our run game going so a road grader guard would be a great idea in the second round. You and I both know that Mendoza is at his best when his run game is successful.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:37 am Grant should get every chance at the job. I am more concerned with getting our run game going so a road grader guard would be a great idea in the second round. You and I both know that Mendoza is at his best when his run game is successful.
Oh I'm completely fine with a guard as you said. I was genuinely curious who you wanted to start at RT. I like Grant and i think he should be Kolton's successor but I don't think he ever played right tackle. I'd personally rather draft a legit right tackle bc there's more uncertainty there at the moment then guard.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Attyla, Raiders Baby
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:44 am Oh I'm completely fine with a guard as you said. I was genuinely curious who you wanted to start at RT. I like Grant and i think he should be Kolton's successor but I don't think he ever played right tackle. I'd personally rather draft a legit right tackle bc there's more uncertainty there at the moment then guard.
Yep, I am mostly worried about our run game. Mendoza has some great short pass options which will help his development, but Jeanty really needs to have holes opened for him so it takes the pressure off the pass game. I think Mendoza, with Jeanty and Bowers will keep defenses honest, but I want larger holes up the middle so Jeanty is not getting hit at the line of scrimmage. I don't know if Grant can play RT but I think he can make the move based on what little we have seen from him.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 671 times
Received High Fives: 363 times

Unread post by rich72 »

I hope we go DT in the 2nd, the latest nfl.com mock has us taking a receiver in the 2nd.
Post Reply