2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)
- RaiderFan1
- Posts: 1,568
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:30 am
- Has given High Fives: 144 times
- Received High Fives: 116 times
2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)
Obvious Mendoza #1 no consideration of trading that pick.
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.
#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.
#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.
Sounds like solid gets
Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there
Who else you like ?
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.
#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.
#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.
Sounds like solid gets
Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there
Who else you like ?
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,035
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2043 times
- Received High Fives: 2751 times
Even though they already know they're drafting Mendoza, my guess is that they use a 30 visit on him. It's an opportunity to spend the day with him and basically start coaching him and teaching him the offensive system.Attyla wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 10:55 am We will have ample time to meet up with Mendoza at his pro day
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
- NoThanksSir, rich72, raidersince63
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
April 1st.Attyla wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2026 10:55 am We will have ample time to meet up with Mendoza at his pro day
- RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 16,317
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 207 times
- Received High Fives: 437 times
Al Davis would take Green with the first pick.DanKD wrote: Thu Mar 19, 2026 10:00 pm Here's my mock using that site
LV Draft Class
===============================
R1 Pick 1: Taylen Green
QB | Arkansas
R2 Pick 36: Brenen Thompson
WRS | Mississippi State
R3 Pick 67: Deion Burks
WRS | Oklahoma
R4 Pick 102: Daylen Everette
CB | Georgia
R4 Pick 117: Jeff Caldwell
WR | Cincinnati
R4 Pick 134: Demond Claiborne
RB | Wake Forest
R5 Pick 175: Lorenzo Styles Jr
S | Ohio State
R6 Pick 182: Joe Royer
TE | Cincinnati
R6 Pick 185: Kaleb Elarms-Orr
OLB | TCU
R6 Pick 208: Toriano Pride Jr
CBN | Missouri
R7 Pick 219: Robert Spears-Jennings
S | Oklahoma
Made with StickToTheModel.com/gm
- These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,035
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2043 times
- Received High Fives: 2751 times
Who knows, maybe some of our recent draft picks takes a step forward. Good to see that some guys are putting in effort on their own to make it happen.
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
- Goodtimes333
-
Hellbound
- Posts: 6,715
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Has given High Fives: 615 times
- Received High Fives: 1027 times
I think he might be able to make the roster via ST but he was kind of atrocious whenever he was on the field but yes, at least he's out there training for the upcoming seasonchucker wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 5:54 am Who knows, maybe some of our recent draft picks takes a step forward. Good to see that some guys are putting in effort on their own to make it happen.
- haji81872
- Posts: 4,082
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
- Has given High Fives: 98 times
- Received High Fives: 342 times
Have to say, I love this draft.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- These users gave a High Five to the author haji81872 for the post (total 2):
- Goodtimes333, RI RAIDER
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,709
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 223 times
- Received High Fives: 493 times
2OTs and 2 OGs seems like overkill. Only 1 DT. No RB. No K. No developmental QB.haji81872 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 7:47 am lv_draft_1774104364809.png
Have to say, I love this draft.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
- MexicanHulk
-
Hellbound
- Posts: 6,715
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Has given High Fives: 615 times
- Received High Fives: 1027 times
Developmental qb??? Mendoza will be on the roster. Why the hell do you need another Developmental qb in the draft? You can find kickers anywhere. There's udfa and guts from the UFL having successCruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 10:07 am 2OTs and 2 OGs seems like overkill. Only 1 DT. No RB. No K. No developmental QB.
- Goodtimes333
- Posts: 1,328
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1769 times
- Received High Fives: 681 times
Getting a couple NT's and backs will be key. I think a RT and a guard in the draft would button up the Oline talent pretty nicely.
Defense: NT, FS
Offense: RT, RB2
To me the biggest needs on each side. RT IMO could be Grant but depth is needed even if he starts. Jeanty is excellent but you need multiple fully capable 25-30 carry guys there. One is none with backs and the same for NT. Need realistically two as it's the point of attack and fundamental for a 3 man line. There isn't a FS on the roster just straight up. That's a pretty big hole and ideally you get two. Line of scrimmage to me takes priority so I list NT first.
That obviously doesn't include the potential of best player available and the option to add another receiver, guard, corner etc etc. Can't fill every possible hole with the best possible prospects. You have to choose priorities. FA was a good start
Defense: NT, FS
Offense: RT, RB2
To me the biggest needs on each side. RT IMO could be Grant but depth is needed even if he starts. Jeanty is excellent but you need multiple fully capable 25-30 carry guys there. One is none with backs and the same for NT. Need realistically two as it's the point of attack and fundamental for a 3 man line. There isn't a FS on the roster just straight up. That's a pretty big hole and ideally you get two. Line of scrimmage to me takes priority so I list NT first.
That obviously doesn't include the potential of best player available and the option to add another receiver, guard, corner etc etc. Can't fill every possible hole with the best possible prospects. You have to choose priorities. FA was a good start
- These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
- haji81872
- Posts: 4,082
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
- Has given High Fives: 98 times
- Received High Fives: 342 times
RB are a dime a dozen, pick up an UDFA. A kicker? We have two. OUr developmetal QB is Mendoza.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 10:07 am 2OTs and 2 OGs seems like overkill. Only 1 DT. No RB. No K. No developmental QB.
There is no such thing as drafting too many linemen.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,620
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1347 times
I mean you ideally want your draft picks to make the roster. We do not have roster room for four rookie offensive lineman. Id say two maximumhaji81872 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 7:37 pm RB are a dime a dozen, pick up an UDFA. A kicker? We have two. OUr developmetal QB is Mendoza.
There is no such thing as drafting too many linemen.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
Do not draft a kicker. Who gives one f[raiders_icon]ck if we have a developmental QB on the roster. The point of the draft is to take the best player available when you are at bat. Not to take a position. I do not know how the draft will fall but the best teams take the player they feel is the best at their slot. The only exception is if you are picking high and are QB needy. Then you have to consider the best QB at your slot. Other than that, you take your guy. We got Bowers because teams were taking QBs like crazy. I even predicted that Bowers would not be there when we picked. I just did not see that level of QB runs. We got a piece that day simply because QB is so overvalued. We don't need a developmental QB after Mendoza. If one falls, I have no problem taking a day three guy, but only if he is the best player available. I am not jamming a square peg in a round hole simply to check some stupid box. If we are going to get a complete team, we need players who will fill certain roles. And no, don't draft a kicker. We have a kicker on the roster and we are only going to carry one. If you want camp competition at kicker, take a free agent one. But it is a complete waste of a pick to take one in the draft.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 10:07 am 2OTs and 2 OGs seems like overkill. Only 1 DT. No RB. No K. No developmental QB.
- WNYRAIDER
- Posts: 4,231
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 327 times
- Received High Fives: 386 times
.....I know that right tackle seems the bigger uncertainty at the moment, but Miller is increasingly less likely to get through a season at left tackle, and we are at the point where drafting his potential replacement has to be a thought. ...even if it is a guy with all of the tools, but' is raw',for whatever reason, whether having outgrown TE or whatever, and we take a shot at him not with our highest picks, but perhaps with one of those 4th rounders....Goodtimes333 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 1:03 pm Getting a couple NT's and backs will be key. I think a RT and a guard in the draft would button up the Oline talent pretty nicely.
Defense: NT, FS
Offense: RT, RB2
To me the biggest needs on each side. RT IMO could be Grant but depth is needed even if he starts. Jeanty is excellent but you need multiple fully capable 25-30 carry guys there. One is none with backs and the same for NT. Need realistically two as it's the point of attack and fundamental for a 3 man line. There isn't a FS on the roster just straight up. That's a pretty big hole and ideally you get two. Line of scrimmage to me takes priority so I list NT first.
That obviously doesn't include the potential of best player available and the option to add another receiver, guard, corner etc etc. Can't fill every possible hole with the best possible prospects. You have to choose priorities. FA was a good start
- Trainnvain
- Posts: 1,432
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
- Has given High Fives: 243 times
- Received High Fives: 172 times
I think the Raiders accomplished this already when they drafted Grant- a guy with all the tools but raw, who needs development.WNYRAIDER wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 4:31 am .....I know that right tackle seems the bigger uncertainty at the moment, but Miller is increasingly less likely to get through a season at left tackle, and we are at the point where drafting his potential replacement has to be a thought. ...even if it is a guy with all of the tools, but' is raw',for whatever reason, whether having outgrown TE or whatever, and we take a shot at him not with our highest picks, but perhaps with one of those 4th rounders....
- These users gave a High Five to the author Trainnvain for the post (total 2):
- chucker, raider_kin
-
Dr Death
- Posts: 4,273
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 4330 times
- Received High Fives: 1119 times
If that's the case... he better start developing this year. I don't see Miller playing much longer.Trainnvain wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 5:31 am I think the Raiders accomplished this already when they drafted Grant- a guy with all the tools but raw, who needs development.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
- raider_kin