The Chiefs Invade Vegas, The Game Day Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

The Chiefs Invade Vegas, The Game Day Thread

Unread post by Attyla »

The line last I checked was 4.5 and the over/under was 47.5

Most the nation will get the game. What's on the menu? What is the drink of choice? Questions remain but one question will be answered today, are the Raiders pretenders to the thrown or are they legitimate. We will find out soon enough. But just in case, keep sharp objects away from you as you watch the Raiders host the Chiefs.

Enjoy the game
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
Yogi, WNYRAIDER
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,041
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Steve007 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:48 pm This Raiders team would be tough to beat with a 16-10 lead in the 3rd. I think it was a bad decision.
Again it changes the game completely so you cant say it lost us the game

Not going for that FG doesn’t cause the 3 point deficit we lost by, although people will say it does they have no correlation

You can say it is bad decision but it doesnt mean we’d have gotten the win
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,081
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 52 times
Received High Fives: 185 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

Turns out the turnover was the play of the game
User avatar
JP808
Posts: 258
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 12:17 am
Has given High Fives: 47 times
Received High Fives: 60 times

Unread post by JP808 »

BG3428 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:48 pm Who had us in a shootout with the chiefs on your bingo card?
This team will lose games but I can handle looking like a good football team who doesn’t quit.
Tough game but they played till the end. I think we beat the Chiefs at Arrowhead. Still positive about the season because they played hard. I wasn’t expecting playoffs this year, but at least this Raiders team can beat any team on any given Sunday. That alone is huge going forward.

Spytek better be identifying a true #1 receiver to go with Bowers for next year. Once Kubiak has that and more depth in the trenches, we will be playoff contenders.

Just gonna sit back and enjoy the season.
These users gave a High Five to the author JP808 for the post (total 5):
Dr Death, Jeevo, Opoponax50, ELCAraiderfan, Owsley Stanley
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,041
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

For the first time in years there is positivity in a loss & shows me that we can be competitive during our hard run of games we have coming up

Maybe we can sneak a win or two against the heavy favourites
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, ALLRAIDERWORLD21
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,232
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

....i appreciate cousins and understand why he is in there at this time, but i will sat that were Mendoza ready to run the offense, his arm talent and could have made the difference today, when compared to cousins diminished arm, and his play based on his understanding of those limitations. ....and when that times comes, it should also take some heat off of our running game. ....we had guys open deep today, as the chiefs were stacking teh box and defending the shorter field.. .....we're getting there.....
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

JP808 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:54 pm Tough game but they played till the end. I think we beat the Chiefs at Arrowhead. Still positive about the season because they played hard. I wasn’t expecting playoffs this year, but at least this Raiders team can beat any team on any given Sunday. That alone is huge going forward.

Spytek better be identifying a true #1 receiver to go with Bowers for next year. Once Kubiak has that and more depth in the trenches, we will be playoff contenders.

Just gonna sit back and enjoy the season.
They call him Charlie B. Fella outta Indiana.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
Arsenal Raider
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 821 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:56 pm They call him Charlie B. Fella outta Indiana.
He isn’t all that. We should have taken Boston over a safety
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 243 times
Received High Fives: 48 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

CWood24 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:52 pm Again it changes the game completely so you cant say it lost us the game

Not going for that FG doesn’t cause the 3 point deficit we lost by, although people will say it does they have no correlation

You can say it is bad decision but it doesnt mean we’d have gotten the win
That misses the point. I just said we’re tough to beat with a 6 point lead in the third. You can’t afford to make big mistakes against the Chiefs.

I don’t see the advantage of going for it there. Without a running game it’s tough to get into the end zone assuming you make it. You might get stopped, you might make it and often end up with 3 later anyway. I prefer gambles with an edge.
These users gave a High Five to the author Steve007 for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, FlyBono24, Opoponax50
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:58 pm He isn’t all that. We should have taken Boston over a safety
Well unless Boston quits the NFL and somehow gets back into college, I don’t see what f[raiders_icon]cking crying about it is gonna do.
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 243 times
Received High Fives: 48 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

I prefer gambling more on that 4th down if the team looks clearly inferior to the Chiefs. But our team was more than holding its own.
User avatar
Rdrfan1964
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2025 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 37 times

Unread post by Rdrfan1964 »

You can put some of the blame on Kubiak himself. #1 why take points off the board at the beginning of the 3rd when you take the lead and, #2 the team got no or lost yards on critical possessions the whole game. The Raiders running game for the most part is a liability and can't be counted on. Too many 3rd and longs. Spread out the D, load up with receivers and throw the God Damn ball! Obviously, the fumble cost us the game on the most important kickoff of the day. Team played hard. it's a tough loss
These users gave a High Five to the author Rdrfan1964 for the post (total 3):
FlyBono24, Opoponax50, Atlasffa
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 821 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 5:00 pm Well unless Boston quits the NFL and somehow gets back into college, I don’t see what f[raiders_icon]cking crying about it is gonna do.
Not crying about it but Charlie Becker ain’t it.
User avatar
FlyBono24
Posts: 6,067
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:49 pm
Has given High Fives: 628 times
Received High Fives: 142 times

Unread post by FlyBono24 »

Steve007 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 4:58 pm That misses the point. I just said we’re tough to beat with a 6 point lead in the third. You can’t afford to make big mistakes against the Chiefs.

I don’t see the advantage of going for it there. Without a running game it’s tough to get into the end zone assuming you make it. You might get stopped, you might make it and often end up with 3 later anyway. I prefer gambles with an edge.
His stubbornness of running Jeanty into a wall on every 1st & 2nd down in the A-gap when they were doing NOTHING and usually getting stuffed in the backfield
These users gave a High Five to the author FlyBono24 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
HesterLayes
Posts: 6,185
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 31 times
Received High Fives: 227 times

Unread post by HesterLayes »

If you watched Seattle and have paid attention this year..he’s not going to abandon the run no matter what
These users gave a High Five to the author HesterLayes for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Sun Oct 04, 2026 5:03 pm Not crying about it but Charlie Becker ain’t it.
Yet he keeps moving up draft boards every week. Maybe you’re right. We’ll see. I’d rather Smith, but I’d definitely rather Charlie B over Coleman and/or Marsh.
Post Reply