Hall of Fame Makes Significant Changes

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Atlasffa
Posts: 13,114
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Just Win Baby!
Has given High Fives: 183 times
Received High Fives: 745 times

Hall of Fame Makes Significant Changes

Unread post by Atlasffa »

User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Willmark wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 2:01 pm Nice refusal to engage in the point of the argument but to be expected.
Quit making things up, I've been engaging the whole time and you know it...you simply refuse to accept Kelly is a first ballot HOFer and totally discount the HOF voters over 1 coach. You also bash Kelly for losing 4 SBs (team losses) while refusing to give him credit for helping to guide his team to 4 straight SBs.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1092 times
Received High Fives: 1009 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Reno Hightower wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 2:13 pm Bradshaw was like Plunkett. He couldn't care less about completion percentages or passer rating. It was all about hitting the big throws. Pressure passing. As I have gotten older I have come to appreciate this QB philosophy more. I wish the NFL would come up with metrics that emphasized that more in a stat happy passing era. I mean baseball has its deadfall era and judges players with that criteria when evaluating careers.

I will say this, I think most QB's in Canton deserve to be there but there are QB's that were left out despite being better than many wearing gold blazers. Ken Anderson comes to mind and I believe a better argument can be raised for Jim Plunkett than some that are enshrined.
Can't like this enough. It is an absolute crime that Ken Anderson is not in.

As to Plunkett? Which is it HOF voters? Oh you've "spoken" that losing four consecutive super bowls merits the HOF, but winning two does not?

Yeah OK... :rolleyes:
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2983 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Willmark wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 2:52 pm Can't like this enough. It is an absolute crime that Ken Anderson is not in.

As to Plunkett? Which is it HOF voters? Oh you've "spoken" that losing four consecutive super bowls merits the HOF, but winning two does not?

Yeah OK... :rolleyes:
Kenny played in a place that just did not garner enough attention.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Yet you still stand on the hill will nothing but the opinion of a coach who can't even get an NFL job so he ends up up at UNC instead...how compelling...Yeah, OK. :rolleyes:
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1092 times
Received High Fives: 1009 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Attyla wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 3:47 pm Kenny played in a place that just did not garner enough attention.
Certainly played into it.

But Kenny was the first real WC QB after the injury to Greg Cook derailed him. (Carter was efficient and the true first one, but it took off under Anderson). Anderson's stats stand up fairly well for the era.

Kenny was money, plus he had an epic mustache.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

RN4L75 wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 8:08 am I believe at the time of retirement Tarkenton held a lot of the all time QB records, passing yards, TD's, wins, rushing yards. That seems to be HOF worthy after the 5 year wait.
Tim Brown was like #2 in all the major WR stats and wasn't first ballot and the person above him was all world, nearly like a Chamberlain or Petty was Rice. I never really got that one.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,048
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 734 times
Received High Fives: 1158 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Willmark wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 3:58 pm Certainly played into it.

But Kenny was the first real WC QB after the injury to Greg Cook derailed him. (Carter was efficient and the true first one, but it took off under Anderson). Anderson's stats stand up fairly well for the era.

Kenny was money, plus he had an epic mustache.
Speaking of Greg Cook, what a tragedy. That guy looked like a legit generational QB.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1092 times
Received High Fives: 1009 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Thinking on Plunkett and Anderson more, in the case of Plunkett, his career stats are up and down: more INTs then TDs, but consider:

Plunkett
Heisman Trophy winner - 1970
NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year - 1971
NFL Comeback Player of the Year - 1980
Super Bowl XV MVP - 1980
Two-time Super Bowl champion - XV and XVIII

That is fairly unique, no other QB I can think of had that like Plunkett.

Kenny Anderson
4× first-team All-Pro
4× Pro Bowl
NFL MVP - 1981
Comeback Player of the Year - 1981
Led the NFL in passer rating 4 times
Led the NFL in completion percentage 3 times
Led the NFL in passing yards twice
Led the NFL in passing TDs once
Career passer rating: 81.9. For that era it was very good.
Super Bowl XVI
Ran the original Bill Walsh offense that ultimately became the West Coast system.

Those two are obvious omissions and really throw a wrench into the HOF criteria.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1092 times
Received High Fives: 1009 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Reno Hightower wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 4:11 pm Speaking of Greg Cook, what a tragedy. That guy looked like a legit generational QB.
His injury created the WC offense because Virgil Carter's arm wasn't like Cook's (no one's was). So by necessity, Walsh had to figure something out.

In steps Kenny Anderson.

I don't have it in front of me but Walsh later said something along the lines of if Cook had not gotten hurt the WC offense would have been very different with him running it.
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2737 times
Received High Fives: 1180 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

raidersince63 wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 3:48 pm Yet you still stand on the hill will nothing but the opinion of a coach who can't even get an NFL job so he ends up up at UNC instead...how compelling...Yeah, OK. :rolleyes:
Forget it bro, he's rolling
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

raider_kin wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 4:48 pm Forget it bro, he's rolling
:rofl: I saw what you did there...I assume you saw that earlier post of mine using that same quote.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2737 times
Received High Fives: 1180 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

raidersince63 wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 4:53 pm :rofl: I saw what you did there...I assume you saw that earlier post of mine using that same quote.
Trying to post from my phone, so missing some things, sent you a pm, take care bro
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,103
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 506 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Attyla wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2026 8:54 am The take away is the older players who aged out before will be aged out for good. Realistically, Stabler would not have been inducted. Craig would not have gotten in. Guy would not have made it. Essentially, unless you are relevant now, you lost your window. McMichael would have been on the outside looking in.

I get it, though. Most of the guys on the senior list were fringe options when they were eligible or they would have gotten in. But claiming you are removing bias from the process is a farce. Bias will always play a part in a HOF selection process.
I'm not seeing how people will be aged out of for good? There's no limit on Seniors..it will be about lobbying for them to get in. Theres no enough modern day players who are good enough to fill out 13 spots every year.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2983 times

Unread post by Attyla »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Sat Sep 05, 2026 5:08 pm I'm not seeing how people will be aged out of for good? There's no limit on Seniors..it will be about lobbying for them to get in. Theres no enough modern day players who are good enough to fill out 13 spots every year.
Because every year the group of newer options loggerjam. The older guys who were fringe options will be pushed out by newer options. The voters are going to remember the newer guys influence far more than guys like Plunkett
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Does the HOF have a "Veteran's Committee" like MLB?...if not, they should.
Post Reply