Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)
-
RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 16,319
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 208 times
- Received High Fives: 437 times
-
Amish Cabal
- Posts: 2,351
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 11:19 am
- Location: Behind enemy lines, KC
- Has given High Fives: 73 times
- Received High Fives: 75 times
[quote=Rte66BBQ post_id=1123325]IMO the Texans already had a Carr that was a lemon. They are interested in another lemon. David admitted he didn't put in the work so they won't want to risk another low character Carr.[/quote]Surfing around team's boards who "might" be interested in Carr, I learned Dolphins fans are much smarter than Jets fans. "Don't want him". "Doesn't have 'IT'". Just an observation interesting only to myself, I'm sure.
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=Jeevo post_id=1123318]I don't think Stidham will be the answer but I'm pretty sure, after seeing him only twice, that he takes that lane and gets out of there.[/quote]Agreed, but question. Why is everyone saying "Stidham isn't the answer?" All these QBs on the market aren't thought to be "the answer" and are described as bridge QBs. My question is why can't Stiddy be a bridge QB? He is going into year #5.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1123331]Agreed, but question. Why is everyone saying "Stidham isn't the answer?" All these QBs on the market aren't thought to be "the answer" and are described as bridge QBs. My question is why can't Stiddy be a bridge QB? He is going into year #5.[/quote]Because he is a competent backup? He might not be a competent bridge? We know those guys can be bridges.
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=chucker post_id=1123309]Are we supposed to drop the mic on a quote that is now 3 NFL seasons old? Cmon man, that's taking reaching to a new level. Maxx hadn't even gotten sober when he said that.[/quote]Ooooooooh, he thinks he's slick!!! 
That quote was wearing acid washed jeans.
That quote was wearing acid washed jeans.-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,919
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1514 times
- Received High Fives: 1554 times
A self mic drop? Oh man. I’m surprised that doesn’t embarrass the hell out of you. Or maybe I’m surprised that I’m surprised.
On the bright side, you’ll have a whole new team to root for soon.
And on another bright side, no one will ever, not for a minute of your life, not one single human being, will ever accuse you of toxic masculinity.
On the bright side, you’ll have a whole new team to root for soon.
And on another bright side, no one will ever, not for a minute of your life, not one single human being, will ever accuse you of toxic masculinity.
-
Archaic
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:27 pm
[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1123331]Agreed, but question. Why is everyone saying "Stidham isn't the answer?" All these QBs on the market aren't thought to be "the answer" and are described as bridge QBs. My question is why can't Stiddy be a bridge QB? He is going into year #5.[/quote]Mostly because Stidham performed so poorly against the Chiefs. Your question is precisely why the Raiders should have benched Carr and started Stidham 6 or 7 weeks ago, so his play for 5 or 6 games could be evaluated.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
-
Rte66BBQ
- Posts: 1,596
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 1:10 pm
[quote=Attyla post_id=1123337]https://i.imgflip.com/779xri.jpg[/quote]Long ago those were pretty funny.
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=Sir Raider Duck, OMS post_id=1123312]I'm reminded of certain other posters using Jared Cook's receiving TDs as "proof" that Cook wasn't any good.[/quote]Was it the same guy who said the NFL rushing champ wasn't the RB for Carr?
-
Xramfan
- Posts: 18,359
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 839 times
- Received High Fives: 1675 times
I’m convinced TwoOutRally is either a blood relative to the Carr family or friends with one in the Carr family. The cult like attachment is creepy
-
signal
- Posts: 13,249
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 8:52 am
[quote=Xramfan post_id=1123341]I’m convinced TwoOutRally is either a blood relative to the Carr family or friends with one in the Carr family. The cult like attachment is creepy[/quote]I am actually coming to think it is Derek himself.
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=Attyla post_id=1123333]Because he is a competent backup? He might not be a competent bridge? We know those guys can be bridges.[/quote]Or he might be a competent bridge.
How do you think those guys got to be "competent bridges", by sitting on the bench? I believe they got an opportunity to play when the guy in front of them was unavailable, so what's the difference? Tyrod Taylor plays this role a few games each year and his performance doesn't matter much...because he is a bridge QB. Do you want your bridge QB losing you draft slots?
How do you think those guys got to be "competent bridges", by sitting on the bench? I believe they got an opportunity to play when the guy in front of them was unavailable, so what's the difference? Tyrod Taylor plays this role a few games each year and his performance doesn't matter much...because he is a bridge QB. Do you want your bridge QB losing you draft slots?
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1123343]Or he might be a competent bridge.
How do you think those guys got to be "competent bridges", by sitting on the bench? I believe they got an opportunity to play when the guy in front of them was unavailable, so what's the difference? Tyrod Taylor plays this role a few games each year and his performance doesn't matter much...because he is a bridge QB. Do you want your bridge QB losing you draft slots?[/quote]no but I want my competent back up to be a back up. After the bridge is gone, you still need your back up
How do you think those guys got to be "competent bridges", by sitting on the bench? I believe they got an opportunity to play when the guy in front of them was unavailable, so what's the difference? Tyrod Taylor plays this role a few games each year and his performance doesn't matter much...because he is a bridge QB. Do you want your bridge QB losing you draft slots?[/quote]no but I want my competent back up to be a back up. After the bridge is gone, you still need your back up
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=Archaic post_id=1123336]Mostly because Stidham performed so poorly against the Chiefs. Your question is precisely why the Raiders should have benched Carr and started Stidham 6 or 7 weeks ago, so his play for 5 or 6 games could be evaluated.[/quote]I completely agreed, but they didn't. So now a 26 year old with moxy and experience in the system should be ignored for bridge QB lifers? Sorry, that doesn't make sense to me. I saw Brissett have multiple chances to take the helm, chances that most young back ups don't get and he did nothing with it. Give the reps to Stiddy.
-
Dark Horse
- Posts: 6,507
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:03 am
[quote=Attyla post_id=1123344]no but I want my competent back up to be a back up. After the bridge is gone, you still need your back up[/quote]You are acting like back ups and bridges are mutually exclusive. The guys you mentioned are in fact back ups just like Stiddy, only we have a much better account of their ceilings. Your philosophy is why Mike Glennon is still padding his pockets.