Post Game - Raiders vs the Rams 10-25-26

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,840
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1127 times
Received High Fives: 1012 times

Post Game - Raiders vs the Rams 10-25-26

Unread post by Willmark »

Well, there is a lot to unpack on this on.
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 288 times
Received High Fives: 54 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

Other than qb where has this team improved from a year ago? One reason the team hasn’t gotten destroyed more often is Kirk has done a much better job of taking care of the football than our qbs in previous years. With Geno we might have seen 2 or 3 int’s. With Minshew it’s probably an int and a fumble or two. Kirk is less mobile than those guys and moves like a statue out there but he gets the most out of his (limited) abilities.
These users gave a High Five to the author Steve007 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Curay7680
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 288 times
Received High Fives: 54 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

I wonder how Tom Brady in his prime would do on this team. Did he ever play in a situation this difficult for a qb? Would he make the playoffs? I think even for him playing with so little help would be a major challenge.
These users gave a High Five to the author Steve007 for the post:
Curay7680
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,763
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 856 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Steve007 wrote: Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:16 pm Other than qb where has this team improved from a year ago? One reason the team hasn’t gotten destroyed more often is Kirk has done a much better job of taking care of the football than our qbs in previous years. With Geno we might have seen 2 or 3 int’s. With Minshew it’s probably an int and a fumble or two. Kirk is less mobile than those guys and moves like a statue out there but he gets the most out of his (limited) abilities.
I think KC has done a really good job, but let's don't fool ourselves he will never take us to the post season, and with that said it's time to move on and see what the future holds.
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 2):
FLORIDARAYDAH, Dr Death
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 288 times
Received High Fives: 54 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

People talk about needing a #1 receiver but at this point I would settle for a receiver that makes at least some plays and at least poses a little bit of a threat out there. Besides Tucker the most we got out of a wideout was Nailor with 14 yards.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,186
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 421 times
Received High Fives: 295 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

raiders93 wrote: Sun Oct 25, 2026 5:42 pm First thing you notice is the difference in line play. Every time they ran the ball the RB has 3 yards to pick a lane. We run the ball and half the D-line is in the backfield.

Offensively, it looks like we’ve been figured out. Stop the run, bracket bowers, play tight on everything else. Tucker might burn you once or twice but that’s about it. And you can pretty well have your entire defence with their back to Kirk and still have zero risk of him hurting you with his legs.

Defensively…. It just looks so vanilla. Maxx is getting doubled almost constantly. The interior rush is almost non existent. The secondary is awful.

Just an ugly game. I’d say the jets were a game I had pencilled in for a win but now… not so sure.
100% All of this.
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,558
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 124 times

Unread post by Be_Easy_25 »

Rob Leonard is not good.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,100
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 763 times
Received High Fives: 1187 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Maybe Mendoza should get a look. There is an old adage that you start the QB that gives you the best chance to win. Cousins has exceeded expectations however you don't know what you have in Mendoza until you play him. Obviously Kubiak knows best but Mendoza is a more mobile QB and can make throws Cousins cannot. Until the film catches up with Mendoza he will be difficult to game plan against.

Cousins is Cap Rooney, Mendoza is more polished Willie Beamon.
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,067
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 260 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Steve007 wrote: Sun Oct 25, 2026 6:16 pm Other than qb where has this team improved from a year ago? One reason the team hasn’t gotten destroyed more often is Kirk has done a much better job of taking care of the football than our qbs in previous years. With Geno we might have seen 2 or 3 int’s. With Minshew it’s probably an int and a fumble or two. Kirk is less mobile than those guys and moves like a statue out there but he gets the most out of his (limited) abilities.
Honestly that’s a pretty fair assessment though I also add Kubiak into the equation. Offensively we had the 32nd ranked offence last year, this year it’s 6th. And to your point, Kirk and Linderbaum are really the only meaningful changes.

I give Kubiak (and Kirk) a lot of credit for that. Personnel wise it’s so far from ideal and nevertheless, they’ve been better than they really have any business being.

Defence has been an absolute disappointment. Save for a few games against bad teams where we had some turnovers… they’ve been horrible. Over the last 3 games we’ve forced 7 punts…. And allowed 19 scoring drives (14 touchdowns).

If I’m looking for positives: Kubiak’s offence once he has better personnel (Mendoza and a #1 receiver) is going to be really, really good.

The downside is this defence looks f[raiders_icon]cked and honestly on paper, it shouldn’t be this bad.
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
Steve007
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,134
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 508 times
Received High Fives: 660 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Willmark wrote: Sun Oct 25, 2026 4:46 pm 1. This was an uneven at best performance on both sides of the ball, and the Offense and the Defense did not look ready to play the entire first half.

2. Kubiak. I want him as coach, he's got a good offensive mind. At the same time opening the game with run up the gut? And then on (nearly) every offensive possession running right up the middle isn't helping matters. I get he wants to establish the run, but when its not there and he keeps forcing it?

3. Nailor, what a disappointment. He's barely out there and when he is he can't hold on.

4. Burford. Holy crap is he bad. He was getting man-handled out there.

IMO lots of issues but at the same time there are glimpses of what Kubiak wants to accomplish. Add to this and Vilma said it on the broadcast: our schedule is not doing us any favors and really wont for the rest of the year. There is nothing we can do about that and play hard.

In general? Not happy about the loss. I suspect we're all in the same boat with that. I don't know what to make of today, right from the first snap they were off.
Kubiak is not going anywhere. I'm going to give him time to get his guys in the building, it's not an overnight process. He's not inept, just overwhelmed when it comes to teams that are upper echelon. The players like him, and he's not throwing inept family members to position coach. The game had not passed him by or is he unwilling to adapt to player strengths. We need to come out of our comfort zone and give a coach a chance, not named Gruden, to evolve and build a competitive team. Kubiak is learning just like everyone else.

Also, he is the guy you want for your young QB. Kubiak is taking his lumps right now, and no disrespect to Kurt, he's playing as best he can for the hand he's been dealt, but it's getting closer to the time Mendoza start taking his lumps and learning and evolving too.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
WNYRAIDER
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,100
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 763 times
Received High Fives: 1187 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

People can bag on the defense all they want but what looked like a potential route got competitive by the end of the 3rd quarter, thanks in large part to the defense.
User avatar
BG3428
Posts: 1,406
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:40 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 130 times

Unread post by BG3428 »

Let’s be real… This was never a playoff team and we all got a little excited about beating bad teams. But this is still an improved team overall that has shown flashes.
I’m still happy with 6-8 wins and hopes of continuing to gel down the stretch.
Defense has what, 8 new starters and a new DC?
Completely new offensive schemes.

Anyone realistic knows this team is 1-2 really good drafts away from being in the playoff discussion.
Need a nose tackle, and another impact edge.
Secondary is crazy young.
Obviously need 1 more LB since 44 and 55 were out there today.
OL is bad…
Need another impact WR. I think Tucker and Bech will be just fine #2 and #3.

People calling for Mark and Spytek’s heads already is kinda silly.

I feel like we have to go Mendoza after the bye.
These users gave a High Five to the author BG3428 for the post (total 4):
ALLRAIDERWORLD21, Jeevo, Curay7680, Dr Death
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,763
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 856 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Well on a high note the Queefs are getting manhandled so far :clap:
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
Curay7680
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,327
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 296 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Oh no our young secondary got schooled by mcvay/stafford. The biggest issue is and has been the inability to stop the run. That’s personnel more than scheme.

Tackling is fundamental. Guys have been doing it since pop warner. The fact they don’t do it in a pro game is again personnel and not on coaching.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,864
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 420 times
Received High Fives: 790 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

At times we look good and do some good things, but at other times we look like a team that was the worst in the league last year. Year one of a rebuild.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 4):
Oaktown Superman, Opoponax50, Curay7680, WNYRAIDER
User avatar
Oaktownonly
Posts: 3,745
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
Has given High Fives: 451 times
Received High Fives: 442 times

Unread post by Oaktownonly »

Kubiak is our guy. I believe Mendoza is our guy. I think the sooner they get to start working together the better.

I guess Kubiak just doesn't feel that way yet.
These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktownonly for the post (total 2):
Curay7680, Dr Death
Post Reply