Gentleman I don't want to curse them...But

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Gentleman I don't want to curse them...But

Unread post by pfish57 »

I think we Finally have a legitimate coaching staff, and that's the difference between shit & honey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Raiders this is first time Iv'e been Raider motivated in 23 f[raiders_icon]cking years & it feels Good!!!!
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 8):
Dr Death, The Real CK, Rainman56, RaiderandBulldog, ELCAraiderfan, mranquales, The Silver Pillager, 3rd and Long
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Seems quite odd that before the season began, most everyone agreed that we are in full rebuild and that losing a lot of games this year wouldn't necessarilly be a bad thing...but now, all of a sudden, playing well and winning games is somehow not a good thing?

...unbelievable.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 4):
WNYRAIDER, rhumbob, mranquales, Opoponax50
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

raidersince63 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 4:41 am Seems quite odd that before the season began, most everyone agreed that we are in full rebuild and that losing a lot of games this year wouldn't necessarilly be a bad thing...but now, all of a sudden, playing well and winning games is somehow not a good thing?

...unbelievable.
...I have felt all along that with the quality players we knew we had, and with some of the kids drafted over the last few years that many of us thought were good picks, value, whatever, at the time, that the team wasn't as putrid as Pete and his kid made them appear to have been, and with the smart off season pick ups to address some of those areas most in need of addressing, and the draft, this team looked to have far less holes that there were last year, and with a roster that could compete with most, if everything came together with the new coaching, and all of the new moving parts.

2-0 is a nice start, but every week will tell its own story on where we are at that time, as the team continues to learn the systems and get the reps in to be able to execute them.
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post (total 6):
GoodTimeCharlie, raidersince63, Raiders Baby, mranquales, Goodtimes333, Knockwood73
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,035
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2042 times
Received High Fives: 2751 times

Unread post by chucker »

We're on pace for a 17 win season.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 7):
GoodTimeCharlie, New67Raiders, Diesis, Raiders Baby, Dr Death, Opoponax50, Steve007
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,703
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1864 times
Received High Fives: 1150 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Our short leg Gay kicker nailed a 58 yarder.

I still dont expect a winning season. We have now played two bad teams in basically home games.

But the future looks bright.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
mstrbass2000
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,081
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 52 times
Received High Fives: 185 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

raidersince63 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 4:41 am Seems quite odd that before the season began, most everyone agreed that we are in full rebuild and that losing a lot of games this year wouldn't necessarilly be a bad thing...but now, all of a sudden, playing well and winning games is somehow not a good thing?

...unbelievable.
Can't both things be true?

I was and am still ok with a top 5 pick in hopes of getting Jeremiah Smith BUT I ALSO and am happy they're 2-0.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

DeathStar24 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 5:37 am Can't both things be true?

I was and am still ok with a top 5 pick in hopes of getting Jeremiah Smith BUT I ALSO and am happy they're 2-0.
Sure, but without naming names, evidently not by everyone.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Steve007 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 2:10 am That’s one of the reasons teams go for it. If they don’t make it, other good things could happen. You can get a safety because your opponent is backed up against the goal line. Your opponent could turn it over which leads to a score. Your opponent could punt from deep in their own territory leading to another scoring opportunity for your team.

The one reason I might hesitate to go for it is the Chargers shut down the running game. I want to feel confident the team can get the td if I’m going for it and at the time I wasn’t confident and wasn’t that surprised the Chargers stuffed that play. So I wouldn’t hate a field goal there to get the lead.
It was still early to really know how much the Chargers were controlling the line of scrimmage, but yes that matters.

Overall I think the Charges won the trenches overall both sides overall, not a blow out there. That also shows good coaching, getting a win when not winning the line of scrimmage.
User avatar
Trainnvain
Posts: 1,431
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
Has given High Fives: 242 times
Received High Fives: 172 times

Unread post by Trainnvain »

SkullCrusher wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 6:40 am It was still early to really know how much the Chargers were controlling the line of scrimmage, but yes that matters.

Overall I think the Charges won the trenches overall both sides overall, not a blow out there. That also shows good coaching, getting a win when not winning the line of scrimmage.
I disagree, the Raiders pressured Herbert all game, forcing a bad interception and many inaccurate throws. 25 of Hampton’s rush yards came in garbage time so the rush defense wasn’t as bad as the stats suggest
These users gave a High Five to the author Trainnvain for the post (total 3):
mstrbass2000, raidersince63, Goodtimes333
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

WNYRAIDER wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 4:59 am ...I have felt all along that with the quality players we knew we had, and with some of the kids drafted over the last few years that many of us thought were good picks, value, whatever, at the time, that the team wasn't as putrid as Pete and his kid made them appear to have been, and with the smart off season pick ups to address some of those areas most in need of addressing, and the draft, this team looked to have far less holes that there were last year, and with a roster that could compete with most, if everything came together with the new coaching, and all of the new moving parts.

2-0 is a nice start, but every week will tell its own story on where we are at that time, as the team continues to learn the systems and get the reps in to be able to execute them.
NOT ME,ive wanted to compete for wins this yr...seen too many teams go from worst to first in 1 yr
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

Trainnvain wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 7:01 am I disagree, the Raiders pressured Herbert all game, forcing a bad interception and many inaccurate throws. 25 of Hampton’s rush yards came in garbage time so the rush defense wasn’t as bad as the stats suggest
...yeah, it seems like most of their success was the earlier drive where they answered our first drive for 7...
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Trainnvain wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 7:01 am I disagree, the Raiders pressured Herbert all game, forcing a bad interception and many inaccurate throws. 25 of Hampton’s rush yards came in garbage time so the rush defense wasn’t as bad as the stats suggest
i agree, herbert cannot take pressure up the gut and the chargers oline up the gut is weak as fvck
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

SkullCrusher wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 6:40 am It was still early to really know how much the Chargers were controlling the line of scrimmage, but yes that matters.

Overall I think the Charges won the trenches overall both sides overall, not a blow out there. That also shows good coaching, getting a win when not winning the line of scrimmage.
i disagree with this...the chargers did not win the line of scrimmage,the raiders had good pressure on herbert all game long and made the necessary stops and our lbs/cbs made plays all game long by taking the ball away is the defense perfect, no it is not perfect but we are at least a top 15 defense now and it shows
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Rabidraider wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 5:26 am Our short leg Gay kicker nailed a 58 yarder.

I still dont expect a winning season. We have now played two bad teams in basically home games.

But the future looks bright.
miami was a gimme but the chargers were a game we were supposed to lose and im happier then shit to be 2-0 woohoo
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post (total 3):
Opoponax50, Trainnvain, Steve007
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 7:06 am NOT ME,ive wanted to compete for wins this yr...seen too many teams go from worst to first in 1 yr

yep, I know we still need to bolster a few pretty important areas, and get the kid up to speed, but this is the first time in a long time where you could say that maybe 3 positions, or so, (DT, WR, RT,...) are the areas most in need of upgrading, as opposed to a dozen of them having been in desperate need.
These users gave a High Five to the author WNYRAIDER for the post (total 5):
mstrbass2000, Goodtimes333, Opoponax50, Steve007, Knockwood73
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 820 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

This fits here as good as anywhere.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1G6Smy ... tid=wwXIfr
Post Reply