Fernando Mendoza Welcome To Las Vegas

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,838
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 170 times
Received High Fives: 412 times

Dante Moore or Fernando Mendoza

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

Call your shot....or add your own.

Dante Moore:

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Dante-Moore-QB-UCLA

Fernando Mendoza:

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Fer ... California

May the football godz look kindly down upon the feeble and inept.

:praying:
These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post (total 2):
Dank Sinatra, DanKD
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,160
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 412 times
Received High Fives: 285 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Toast wrote: Sat Jul 04, 2026 10:42 pm I don't believe there is a set agenda regarding Fernando's accession other than it is contingent on the progress of the OL. Even if Mendoza has a phenomenal training camp and pre-season I doubt he would start if the line doesn't gel.

This will sound callous, but AOC's greatest value to the team is that it really doesn't matter if he gets injured. Obviously no one wants that but he adds serviceable depth until he doesn't.
The OL, it's seems a little tricky to me. If the OL is middle of the pack and Mendoza is moved up to #2 to start the season and Cousins goes down right away now you can't bring in AO and it has to be Mendoza. If someone gets hurt on the OL and the shuffling begins now you have your #1 overall and hopeful "guy" under center playing behind a shaky OL. If our OL was already in place I wouldn't be surprised if they let a game or two or five play out and then bring him in. There are just so many questions surrounding it. I cannot state this enough, we need to be formidable at running the ball.
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post (total 2):
Reno Hightower, chucker
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2754 times

Unread post by chucker »

16 to 88 wrote: Mon Jul 06, 2026 8:50 pm The OL, it's seems a little tricky to me. If the OL is middle of the pack and Mendoza is moved up to #2 to start the season and Cousins goes down right away now you can't bring in AO and it has to be Mendoza. If someone gets hurt on the OL and the shuffling begins now you have your #1 overall and hopeful "guy" under center playing behind a shaky OL. If our OL was already in place I wouldn't be surprised if they let a game or two or five play out and then bring him in. There are just so many questions surrounding it. I cannot state this enough, we need to be formidable at running the ball.
Promoting Mendoza is easy, demoting him is hard. There's nothing wrong with having the strategy that he's low on the depth chart until the team decides that they are ready for him to play every snap, every game.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 4):
Hellbound, 16 to 88, rhumbob, Reno Hightower
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2754 times

Unread post by chucker »

It's pretty funny at this point seeing the OP on every page asking whether it should be Moore or Mendoza.
User avatar
Raiders Baby
Posts: 3,120
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:54 am
Has given High Fives: 303 times
Received High Fives: 89 times

Unread post by Raiders Baby »

^I also like speculating about pairing Micah Parsons with Maxx every time I open the “around the NFL” thread
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,716
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 614 times
Received High Fives: 1027 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

chucker wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 5:22 am Promoting Mendoza is easy, demoting him is hard. There's nothing wrong with having the strategy that he's low on the depth chart until the team decides that they are ready for him to play every snap, every game.
It's always fun to play with the shiny new toy but now is not the time to be impatient with him. Im not saying everything has to be perfectly set up for him, but we've seen what happens when qbs are thrown in there before they're ready or the oline completely sucks
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post (total 3):
raidersince63, 16 to 88, chucker
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Hellbound wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 7:03 am It's always fun to play with the shiny new toy but now is not the time to be impatient with him. Im not saying everything has to be perfectly set up for him, but we've seen what happens when qbs are thrown in there before they're ready or the oline completely sucks
Agreed, and most people also agree...including management.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, 16 to 88
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1112 times
Received High Fives: 571 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Hellbound wrote: Tue Jul 07, 2026 7:03 am It's always fun to play with the shiny new toy but now is not the time to be impatient with him. Im not saying everything has to be perfectly set up for him, but we've seen what happens when qbs are thrown in there before they're ready or the oline completely sucks
My opinion on this has always been that Cousins should start and that Mendoza should be brought along until the coaching staff thinks he'll be okay enough to get on the field. It was when people here started saying that our first round, first pick QB should sit behind O'Connell that it became silly. If Cousins goes down or is just mediocre-to-bad, then Mendoza needs to be put out there.

Under no circumstance should O'Connell be put in before Mendoza. I agree that throwing a rookie into the fire is a bad idea, but you can't bubblewrap the kid either.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Opoponax50 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 10:26 am My opinion on this has always been that Cousins should start and that Mendoza should be brought along until the coaching staff thinks he'll be okay enough to get on the field. It was when people here started saying that our first round, first pick QB should sit behind O'Connell that it became silly. If Cousins goes down or is just mediocre-to-bad, then Mendoza needs to be put out there.

Under no circumstance should O'Connell be put in before Mendoza. I agree that throwing a rookie into the fire is a bad idea, but you can't bubblewrap the kid either.
So if the Raiders OL has not jelled and Cousins keeps getting the shit kicked out of him and goes down with an injury, you think the best move is to hastily throw Mendo, to the dogs and into a chaotic situation instead of letting AOC take the licks instead?

Sounds very irresponsible to me and I can't believe management would agree with you either.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Southshield
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2978 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Opoponax50 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 10:26 am My opinion on this has always been that Cousins should start and that Mendoza should be brought along until the coaching staff thinks he'll be okay enough to get on the field. It was when people here started saying that our first round, first pick QB should sit behind O'Connell that it became silly. If Cousins goes down or is just mediocre-to-bad, then Mendoza needs to be put out there.

Under no circumstance should O'Connell be put in before Mendoza. I agree that throwing a rookie into the fire is a bad idea, but you can't bubblewrap the kid either.
There is a path for O'Connell to start over Mendoza but it would be because the line has not gelled. But then again, you cannot protect these guys from injury and Mendoza was pretty tough at Cal with a line that was horrible. I do want to see him successful and that only happens once he starts. And learning under some duress has some merit.

And we got to take into consideration that while Mendoza is a brilliant mind, learning the book and executing the book are two different things so that could be a factor, as unlikely as I think.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,283
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 918 times
Received High Fives: 2141 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

If there is ZERO improvement in the OL, then management has failed miserably. Simple n plain. People also seem to forget that the QB affects the line play too. I have no faith that a 37 year old washed up Kirk Cousins or cement footed 3rd stringer Aidan O'Connell will do the line any favors. At least we know Mendoza is mobile, can and will get the ball out quickly and accurately. That matters.

Mendoza starts over O'Connell in every imagineable universe. Stop overthinking it.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2714 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Opoponax50 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 10:26 am My opinion on this has always been that Cousins should start and that Mendoza should be brought along until the coaching staff thinks he'll be okay enough to get on the field. It was when people here started saying that our first round, first pick QB should sit behind O'Connell that it became silly. If Cousins goes down or is just mediocre-to-bad, then Mendoza needs to be put out there.

Under no circumstance should O'Connell be put in before Mendoza. I agree that throwing a rookie into the fire is a bad idea, but you can't bubblewrap the kid either.
thank the old gods and the new that you are not in charge
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,563
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 856 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

The longer we wait to play him, the worst it's going to be. The OL argument has SOME merit, but that's only due to perception of skill based on him not having time to do anything. Same as Jeanty, give him space to do ANYTHING and he looks like a completely different player.
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 668 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 11:04 am So if the Raiders OL has not jelled and Cousins keeps getting the shit kicked out of him and goes down with an injury, you think the best move is to hastily throw Mendo, to the dogs and into a chaotic situation instead of letting AOC take the licks instead?

Sounds very irresponsible to me and I can't believe management would agree with you either.
Our O-line was shit last year because Pete Carrols incompetent son was in charge of it. He isnt even a real coach. Our O-line will be great this season.
These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

rich72 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 7:30 pm Our O-line was shit last year because Pete Carrols incompetent son was in charge of it. He isnt even a real coach. Our O-line will be great this season.
I hope you are right. But until that becomes reality, we can't know that for sure.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1112 times
Received High Fives: 571 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2026 11:04 am So if the Raiders OL has not jelled and Cousins keeps getting the shit kicked out of him and goes down with an injury, you think the best move is to hastily throw Mendo, to the dogs and into a chaotic situation instead of letting AOC take the licks instead?

Sounds very irresponsible to me and I can't believe management would agree with you either.
Yes, he needs to get in the game and take his lumps just like everyone else has to when a starter goes down. He's a football player, not a hunting dog who won first prize at the Westminster Dog Show but will never be taken hunting because he has more value as a trophy dog.

I've said it before but it bears repeating. If the kid is third on the depth chart, it'll likely mean that O'Connell handily beat him out for the backup spot, which in turn means that something's very wrong with our #1 pick.

I think Cousins should start for an indeterminate amount of time, but how long that'll be will depend on how he's playing. He's looked pretty washed and he's immobile, but maybe that's because of coaching, the players around him, injury recovery, etc. He may come out and play very well. OTOH, maybe he comes out and is clearly not up to the job. If that's the case then we need to see what we have in Mendoza so that he begin developing.

Things are never going to be ideal for any No. 1 pick in the draft. They get picked there for a reason.
Post Reply