Welcome to the Raiders Jermod McCoy

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,355
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 839 times
Received High Fives: 1672 times

Welcome to the Raiders Jermod McCoy

Unread post by Xramfan »

User avatar
JRaider17
The JudgeFernando
Posts: 12,848
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 304 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

Hoping the hold up with his rookie contract isn't because of guarantees and his injury.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

It will be interesting to see if Kirk Cousins nicknames him, "Bones".
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,804
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 945 times

Unread post by Viper »

Raiders Baby wrote: Fri May 08, 2026 9:08 am I’ll give the pissy Cheerios take.

I think the fact that we passed on him at 38, 67, 91 is evidence that we also have some serious medical questions.

Maybe we would let him drop past 38 and play chicken with everyone else until 67 or even 91, but if McCoy had a pristine medical grade in our book I don’t think we’d let him slide lower than that.

If we love McCoy the player, then we have to weigh the risk of taking him against the risk of losing out to a more aggressive team. The fact that we spent two picks (67 & 91) before taking the risk means we think there is at least SOME risk with the pick. Otherwise, the risk of losing him to another team would’ve made us act.

This is especially true at 91, because there was a very real possibility that someone else would take a top 10 graded player before or at 100. Even with that risk, we decided that we’d rather have a lower graded player with a better medical record.

I am enjoying the Koolaid (what a fool I am) and so I appreciate the positive spin here. And hey, maybe it will all work out. What a blessing that would be!

But I’m an actions >> words guy, and our actions said pretty explicitly that we also agree there is a “ticking time bomb” risk with McCoy
I was thinking the more likely scenario was our staff had overnight to think about and discuss it. Thinking they would take the leap and jumped to the front of the line to start the day. With where they got him it’s a good value and risk imo.
User avatar
Raiders Baby
Posts: 3,120
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:54 am
Has given High Fives: 303 times
Received High Fives: 89 times

Unread post by Raiders Baby »

Viper wrote: Fri May 15, 2026 11:50 am I was thinking the more likely scenario was our staff had overnight to think about and discuss it. Thinking they would take the leap and jumped to the front of the line to start the day. With where they got him it’s a good value and risk imo.
Oh I’m sure once he was on the board still at the top of Day 3, we locked in on him. Clearly he was never off our board entirely, and on day 3 he became a priority.

Half full: His medicals weren’t so bad to keep him from being on our board, which means the front office must think there is at least some chance he will be a productive player

Half empty: his medicals were worrisome, because if they weren’t one of the teams would attempt to be “smarter than everyone else” earlier in the draft. There must be a high risk of something being wrong because at least one of the teams would’ve made that calculation

I’m a Koolaid guy :koolaid: I want it to work, and I am willing to bet on upside. I just think the beat writers who are celebrating because Jermod is at practice are missing the point — the risk is not about whether he is healthy this year, but whether he can hold up for more than a year or two before his knee starts breaking gown
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,327
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1061 times
Received High Fives: 584 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

This would be incredible if this kid can play. Getting a top talent (projected to possibly be in the top 10) in the 4th would be HUGE. I know we drafted a few injured players later in the draft than they were projected to be because of injury. Unfortunately, it never worked out for us.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 3):
Rabidraider, Rick In Bakersfield, Viper
User avatar
LesterHayesHOFer
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:44 am
Received High Fives: 30 times

Unread post by LesterHayesHOFer »

RI RAIDER wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 11:13 am This would be incredible if this kid can play. Getting a top talent (projected to possibly be in the top 10) in the 4th would be HUGE. I know we drafted a few injured players later in the draft than they were projected to be because of injury. Unfortunately, it never worked out for us.
Michael Bush was a pretty good RB for a little while.
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,588
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

We'll talk when hes done fielding punts and kick offs at practice.
User avatar
Rick In Bakersfield
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 28 times
Received High Fives: 28 times

Unread post by Rick In Bakersfield »

I was one of those guys who wasn't thrilled with the pick because of the injury, but if the HC says he's looked good at the Rookie Mini camp, then I am all for giving him a chance.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,091
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 764 times
Received High Fives: 1006 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Rick In Bakersfield wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 3:56 pm I was one of those guys who wasn't thrilled with the pick because of the injury, but if the HC says he's looked good at the Rookie Mini camp, then I am all for giving him a chance.
i wanted us to grab him earlier then the 4th...kid would have been the top cb in this draft if he had been healthy, very sticky witht eh ability to move wr off of their routes
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

I'm skeptical that the Raiders outsmarted 31 other teams but I will say that if this kid proves to be healthy and has a great career, I'll eat crow.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,559
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 855 times
Received High Fives: 264 times

Unread post by mranquales »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 4:29 pm I'm skeptical that the Raiders outsmarted 31 other teams but I will say that if this kid proves to be healthy and has a great career, I'll eat crow.
If you remember, just one year prior, The Raiders didn't take a chance on a corner with health concerns, and he dropped to the second/third round. He got picked right after us in fact (went to the Cardinals I believe). He ended up having a pretty solid rookie campaign and looks to be the steal of that draft.

If you ask me, the Raiders are making up for that pick by taking Jermod McCoy.
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,328
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1769 times
Received High Fives: 681 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

The pick was a no brainer. When you suck & it's day 3 of the draft, swing for the fences
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 4):
raidersince63, Dr Death, RI RAIDER, WNYRAIDER
User avatar
haji81872
Posts: 4,082
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
Has given High Fives: 98 times
Received High Fives: 342 times

Unread post by haji81872 »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 6:51 pm The pick was a no brainer. When you suck & it's day 3 of the draft, swing for the fences
Yep.

Plus with a 4th round pick if we get 3 to 4 seasons of starter caliber football out of him it will be worth it.
These users gave a High Five to the author haji81872 for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,670
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 176 times
Received High Fives: 465 times

Unread post by heavyD »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu May 21, 2026 4:29 pm I'm skeptical that the Raiders outsmarted 31 other teams but I will say that if this kid proves to be healthy and has a great career, I'll eat crow.
It's not about outsmarting and more risk tolerance. He was going to get drafted by a team and it was only a matter of when.
These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post (total 5):
chucker, raidersince63, Goodtimes333, RI RAIDER, WNYRAIDER
Post Reply