2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderFan1
Posts: 1,568
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:30 am
Has given High Fives: 144 times
Received High Fives: 116 times

2026 Draft - Raiders & all teams (April 23-25)

Unread post by RaiderFan1 »

Obvious Mendoza #1 no consideration of trading that pick.
But who you got picks 2 - 4 thats going to help Mendoza.

#2 Raiders should be able to select WR Chris Bell or WR KC Concepcion with our early 2nd.

#3 I forget who it was, but someone here mentioned that the best pure dominant RT coming out of college could be got in the 3rd. And stated hes played his whole career at RT, and not being moved around the line.

Sounds like solid gets

Id hope the rest of the draft is building the trenches, with maybe 1 DB in there

Who else you like ?
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,589
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 551 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

A run plugger only in the 4th is fine. Or pick up a vet but from the looks of the prospects I wouldn't draft a DT at 36.
These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post:
rich72
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,589
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 551 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Check this guy out for right guard or right tackle.

Of what I project to be left available at 36tackle, id go with Gennings Dunker.
Can block in space, mauler run blocker, quick kick step , plays till the whistle.
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,041
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Tue Mar 17, 2026 5:44 pm If we needed a penetrating pass-rushing DT, I’d agree. Thankfully we’re now more in the market for a massive plug/occupy/crush the middle type. For that we have a few excellent possibilities in Big Orange, Jackson Jr., and The Godfather.

Personally I’d like Big Orange in the 3rd and Godfather in the 4th to give Big Orange the occasional breather when necessary yet not take too big a step-back talent-wise.
Corleone, Jackson & Orange all do the one thing you want them to do which is anchor & hold there ground but they all have pass rush questions mind you there are sign that they could develop more of a pass rush.

Kayden MacDonald & Lee Hunter are wildcards if they drop to the 2nd because they are a little above the guys mentioned, i can’t see either being there though.

As for Banks if he makes it to the 4th then you have to take a shot at a talent like that cause if you can get him healthy then the potential is there for a great 3-4 DL. This isnt Wilson in the 1st with a foot injury this is a day 3 pick where your taking a flyer at potential
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,041
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

KillerRaider30 wrote: Tue Mar 17, 2026 7:08 pm A run plugger only in the 4th is fine. Or pick up a vet but from the looks of the prospects I wouldn't draft a DT at 36.
If Lee Hunter is a therr at 36 then DT he has to in the conversation

The gets in the backfield & is a disruptor from the NT position there is a little Vince Wilfork in him when you watch him
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, Goodtimes333
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Nothing we have done in free agency changes what we will do in the draft. This is a great draft for OL and DL very deep into the 4th and I expect we will be filling those slots. My personal goal is that we draft in such a way that Meredith is obsolete on the roster. We have for a long time relied on borderline backups as starters.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
Raiders Baby, Willmark
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 665 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

I want either a DT, O-line, or CB with our second pick, I would be irritated if we grabbed a RB in the 2nd.
These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Well, god forbid the team irritates you
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,109
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 770 times
Received High Fives: 1013 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

dt,safety,oline
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 920 times
Received High Fives: 2135 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

rich72 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 10:15 am I want either a DT, O-line, or CB with our second pick, I would be irritated if we grabbed a RB in the 2nd.
A RB?

Huh?
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,199
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 443 times

Unread post by vtraider »

Dt free safety and OL are what I would like our focus to be. Yes we could definitely use some upgrades at cb. But we have zero free safties on the roster. The only possible. And I stress possible nose on the roster is peguese and he's definitely not experienced in it. Wr we would all love to have a true number 1 but we have some 2's and 3's which you can win with if the coach schemes them right. We might have guys on the ol with the guys drafted last year. But we don't know and even if we do we still need quality depth.
These users gave a High Five to the author vtraider for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 665 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 12:21 pm A RB?

Huh?
They were meeting with some RB for the top 30 picks thing.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 920 times
Received High Fives: 2135 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

rich72 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 2:42 pm They were meeting with some RB for the top 30 picks thing.
That means nothing.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
mstrbass2000, Goodtimes333
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,109
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 770 times
Received High Fives: 1013 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 2:50 pm That means nothing.
smoke screens do happen...no way in hell should we take a rb in teh 1st 5 rds of the draft...hell we could just sign one after the draft
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 920 times
Received High Fives: 2135 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:03 pm smoke screens do happen...no way in hell should we take a rb in teh 1st 5 rds of the draft...hell we could just sign one after the draft
Oh we're gonna draft one. Just not in the 2nd round. Kubiak made it clear this is gonna be a 2 back offense, just like Seattle was.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, Goodtimes333
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,926
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1510 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

BoKnows81 wrote: Wed Mar 18, 2026 3:29 pm Oh we're gonna draft one. Just not in the 2nd round. Kubiak made it clear this is gonna be a 2 back offense, just like Seattle was.
:fingerup:
Post Reply