He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 816 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,208
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 449 times

Unread post by vtraider »

Only thing I could see them doing is getting rid of the "legal tampering" period. Basically go back to where it was in the mid 90s. Free agency opens the first day of the new league year with no tampering or deals done before then
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,325
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 931 times
Received High Fives: 2168 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:09 pm Oh I agree, but the physical is the one thing that can break any deal. And they cannot do the physical before they do the deal. It is just one of those things. If we were talking a player who would cost you 50K, ok no problem. But the players are 30M or more with some of these deals. Sucks that we got bit, sucks they could do what they do, but again, I am at a loss to figure out how you can legislate a rule that would have avoided this. Specialist doctor with a great reputation and his opinion would be evaluated by the team to make or break the deal.
I know this is hard to admit for some but the Ravens did nothing wrong legally. Morally? Sure. But who gives a f[raiders_icon]ck. As I've said countless times, this is a business. Feelings don't matter. Time to move on.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 4):
chucker, Attyla, Hellbound, Goodtimes333
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:17 pm I know this is hard to admit for some but the Ravens did nothing wrong legally. Morally? Sure. But who gives a f[raiders_icon]ck. As I've said countless times, this is a business. Feelings don't matter. Time to move on.
shady yes, followed the rules yes, Maxx is not a Raven as a result. He is going to make a player cry next season with his anger
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,549
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 231 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 12:55 pm ... And it was the Cowboy's team doctor who did the evaluation. And he is a world renowned knee specialist. Hard to question his medical opinion. Specialists with his reputation are normally well respected.
How do we know what the doctor actually reported. He may have reported the knee was as expected and the Ravens made the call that he failed.
Do these physical reports from the doctor actually get supplied the league? Can the NFL question the Doctor to see what he actually reported to the Ravens? Doesn't seem complicated.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,325
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 931 times
Received High Fives: 2168 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:42 pm shady yes, followed the rules yes, Maxx is not a Raven as a result. He is going to make a player cry next season with his anger
Thats all we can hope for. Maxx going bonkers next year.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

vtraider wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:14 pm Only thing I could see them doing is getting rid of the "legal tampering" period. Basically go back to where it was in the mid 90s. Free agency opens the first day of the new league year with no tampering or deals done before then
trades can be done before the tampering period which is what happened this time and that was the way it was before the tampering period. You just cannot make it a done deal until the new year.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 756 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:17 pm I know this is hard to admit for some but the Ravens did nothing wrong legally. Morally? Sure. But who gives a f[raiders_icon]ck. As I've said countless times, this is a business. Feelings don't matter. Time to move on.
It's not fair!

A deal is a deal*

* Jerry Lundegaard. -1996
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,858
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 420 times
Received High Fives: 799 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:55 pm It's not fair!

A deal is a deal*

* Jerry Lundegaard. -1996
Damn, it’s been 30 years?
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 756 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Jeevo wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:57 pm Damn, it’s been 30 years?
Your darn tooten.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post:
Jeevo
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,208
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 449 times

Unread post by vtraider »

Attyla wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:43 pm trades can be done before the tampering period which is what happened this time and that was the way it was before the tampering period. You just cannot make it a done deal until the new year.
True. That's the only thing I could think of though as in the most the NFL could/would do. Maybe change it to where trades can't be done until the new year starts as well. But I don't think they will do anything
These users gave a High Five to the author vtraider for the post:
Reno Hightower
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,761
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1911 times
Received High Fives: 1181 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Should of stated:

We thought Maxx at his salary and abilities was worth 2 first round picks, but

When Hendricksons price dropped about 25%, it was a smarter move to sign him and keep the two 1st rounders,

especially since we lost our all pro center who now needs to be replaced.

These deals are all pending signatures and we have ever right to change our mind.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
Reno Hightower
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Raider_Dave wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 2:42 pm How do we know what the doctor actually reported. He may have reported the knee was as expected and the Ravens made the call that he failed.
Do these physical reports from the doctor actually get supplied the league? Can the NFL question the Doctor to see what he actually reported to the Ravens? Doesn't seem complicated.
The wording? That I don't know. But we do know the knee is not healed right now. It might be getting close but no way a soft tissue injury. The reports and scan pictures would have been supplied to the Ravens and yes, they make the call. There is a large level of speculation that they used the report to invalidate the trade but there would have to be wording in there of the concerns to do so. It does not have to say he will not make it to the end of the deal, just that there is risk of that. And the CBA allows the league to review the reports and pictures so they can review it as well. We all just need to remember, these are doctor opinions. Medicine, especially knees and shoulders and such are tricky to evaluate 100% which is why I suspect they brought in this particular surgeon.

But as noted, they did not break a rule. They were sketchy as hell and I doubt it should have been done but they did not break a rule. We will know a ton more once camp starts and we see how active Maxx is.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 756 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Rabidraider wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 3:25 pm Should of stated:

We thought Maxx at his salary and abilities was worth 2 first round picks, but

When Hendricksons price dropped about 25%, it was a smarter move to sign him and keep the two 1st rounders,

especially since we lost our all pro center who now needs to be replaced.

These deals are all pending signatures and we have ever right to change our mind.
No, you are right and I agree with everyone that feels as though the Raven's simply exercised their rights. It's a bit of sour grapes on my part because I thought Spytek swung one hell of a deal.
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,761
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1911 times
Received High Fives: 1181 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 3:32 pm No, you are right and I agree with everyone that feels as though the Raven's simply exercised their rights. It's a bit of sour grapes on my part because I thought Spytek swung one hell of a deal.
It was a great deal and it was a scumbag move by the Ravens and they should of thought out the Hendrickson numbers before screwing the Raiders.

They should of owned up on their change of mind, instead of pushing the BS knee narrative.

When you are honest, its stated and done, when you lie it festers like a boil on a hooker ass....

Bad karma coming the Ravens way....
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
Reno Hightower
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 756 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Rabidraider wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 3:42 pm It was a great deal and it was a scumbag move by the Ravens and they should of thought out the Hendrickson numbers before screwing the Raiders.

They should of owned up on their change of mind, instead of pushing the BS knee narrative.

When you are honest, its stated and done, when you lie it festers like a boil on a hooker ass....

Bad karma coming the Ravens way....
Yeah, f[raiders_icon]ck the Ravens.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post:
Rabidraider
Post Reply