He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,672
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 177 times
Received High Fives: 462 times

Unread post by heavyD »

16 to 88 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:38 am Yes sir! Maybe the multi billion dollar NFL one day will get around to fixing this? Or are the ravens gonna keep making trades that the whole world knows they agreed to just to squirm out of it with this loop hole?
At the end of the day this reflects more on the Ravens as it’s rare for teams to back out of big trades like this. It’s on the rest of the league to tread cautiously when dealing with unethical organizations like the Ravens.
These users gave a High Five to the author heavyD for the post (total 2):
16 to 88, Viper
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:05 am Something just crossed my mind and before anyone loses their cabbage, it's just a random thought/possibility.

What if, Maxx decided himself that Baltimore is not where he cared to go, and purposely dogged it at the physical?
The physical is really hard to fake. It is not like they would have him running or such given how recent the surgery was. It likely was more scans and such.
User avatar
NewEraX25
Posts: 2,732
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:46 pm
Received High Fives: 160 times

Unread post by NewEraX25 »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:05 am Something just crossed my mind and before anyone loses their cabbage, it's just a random thought/possibility.

What if, Maxx decided himself that Baltimore is not where he cared to go, and purposely dogged it at the physical?
Then why do the whole flock nation thing on his video?
These users gave a High Five to the author NewEraX25 for the post:
rich72
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

tatalalicious wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 8:44 am This is such nonsense, this is no where near a "drastic"situation. It's safe to say that it was Crosby who wanted the trade not the Raiders, so they currently are where they wanted to be before being forced into trading their most valuable asset no matter what anyone else things of the player. There is no cap crisis that would dictate them moving Crosby unless they get their price, and I suspect Crosby/his agent will now back off and focus on preparing for the season.
Right, if Micah stayed with the Cowboys he would have played and life goes on. When you make a trade it's supposed to be of equal value to both sides, so it's not like a loss, it's a pivot. Maybe not the most desirable, but not a loss, more like dreams were changed unexpectedly and no one cares for that.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,040
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2050 times
Received High Fives: 2757 times

Unread post by chucker »

haji81872 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:42 am If we need more cash we can free up about 25 million or more.

Restructure Maxx Crosbycould free up roughly $16.9 million to $30 million+ depending on how the deal is structured.

Restructure/Extend Kolton Miller could create about $8.8 million to $14 million in immediate savings.

Even more with Chinn, but I am not sure how much we could save there.
Good points. A simple restructure of Maxx would save plenty of cap. The team could still sign whatever FAs it wants to sign. Right now there's no need to restructure anyone.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
RickRyb, RI RAIDER, Goodtimes333
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Is there any good FA olineman still out there that can help us be more certain of this problem being fixed for '26?
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1156 times
Received High Fives: 443 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

If Crosby goes and has a DPOY type of season Baltimore will look really bad. If Crosby blows his knee out in the first game of the season Baltimore can say, "See, we told you his knee didn't look right"
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,838
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 170 times
Received High Fives: 412 times

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

Although the Raiders have the right to restructure Crosby’s 2026 compensation to reduce the cap hit for 2026, the money will be paid from a predetermined cash budget. Whatever they had allocated for Monday’s spending spree will have another $30 million added to it.

That’s a problem for the Raiders. It’s one of the reasons why last night’s tweet oozed with animosity for the Ravens. We’re told that, as of last night, the Raiders were working hard to figure out what to do next. If they will indeed be keeping Crosby, they’ll need to shake Mark Davis’s couch cushions for another $30 million that they didn’t expect to spend this year.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,718
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 224 times
Received High Fives: 500 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Pseudoscot wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 4:07 am
Personally, I'd like to see some sort of deposit system. If teams agree a trade then they have to put a 2nd/3rd round draft pick up as collateral. Trade falls through? The other team gets the pick. Obviously this would need some tinkering.
When you buy a house, its called earnest money.
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,853
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 413 times
Received High Fives: 794 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:41 am This scandal is almost as big as when that guy on here faked his own death to get out of paying the fantasy football winners.
Poor Max-B, he was dead in my mind for a few minutes until Corleone did a bit of detective work and uncovered the scam. His theft made him a few hundredaire.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
chucker
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,418
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 338 times
Received High Fives: 862 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Someone faked their death to rip off fantasy football players? That’s an elite scumbag. Is he still on the board lol?
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,040
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2050 times
Received High Fives: 2757 times

Unread post by chucker »

Sold My Soul wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 10:03 am Although the Raiders have the right to restructure Crosby’s 2026 compensation to reduce the cap hit for 2026, the money will be paid from a predetermined cash budget. Whatever they had allocated for Monday’s spending spree will have another $30 million added to it.

That’s a problem for the Raiders. It’s one of the reasons why last night’s tweet oozed with animosity for the Ravens. We’re told that, as of last night, the Raiders were working hard to figure out what to do next. If they will indeed be keeping Crosby, they’ll need to shake Mark Davis’s couch cushions for another $30 million that they didn’t expect to spend this year.
The difference between the cash they would pay to Crosby and the cash they would pay to the #14 pick in 2026 is more like $15 million. And the Raiders weren't done in FA anyway, so they can adjust their plan going forward as well. This is not a cash issue for the team.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
RickRyb
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,838
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 170 times
Received High Fives: 412 times

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 10:10 am The difference between the cash they would pay to Crosby and the cash they would pay to the #14 pick in 2026 is more like $15 million. And the Raiders weren't done in FA anyway, so they can adjust their plan going forward as well. This is not a cash issue for the team.
Agreed. They will still have about 36M of cap space available.
These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post:
chucker
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,202
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 445 times

Unread post by vtraider »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:05 am Something just crossed my mind and before anyone loses their cabbage, it's just a random thought/possibility.

What if, Maxx decided himself that Baltimore is not where he cared to go, and purposely dogged it at the physical?
If that happened I think it would have more been around contract negotiations. And that Maxx wanted more guaranteed money and they used the failed physical as a result of it
User avatar
tatalalicious
Posts: 1,161
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 78 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by tatalalicious »

chucker wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 9:32 am All reports are that no agreement is binding. I think it's completely allowed for teams or players to back out of their deals made prior to the new league year. If a team wants absolute certainty, then don't make deals until you can operate with absolute certainty. Nobody forced the Raiders to make this deal Friday.
Yeah nobody was forced, but if you cant rely on teams who are given full disclosure regarding a player, to honor agreements than the whole system collapses. It's especially egregious that the Ravens likely waited till the last moment to bail once they were sure they'd be able to land Hendricks. While the Ravens waited other teams interested moved on and looked elsewhere. I think it'll work out in the end for the Raiders but there is an unspoken rule here that the Ravens didn't abide by, which has to impact how some teams deal with them in the future.
Post Reply