New coach ………. Again

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Who should be the next head coach

Young offensive minded guy Kubiak, Kafka, Cooter etc..
74
91%
Young defensive minded guy Minter, Campanile, Shula etc.
3
4%
Retread Saleh, McCarthy, too many to list.
4
5%
Total votes: 81

User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,314
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

New coach ………. Again

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

What’s your thoughts? I prefer young offensive minded with a fresh DC. Kubiak, Cooter, Kafka and pair them with someone like Al Harris as the DC.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
Oaktown Superman
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 753 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

raiders72 wrote: Fri Jan 02, 2026 6:29 pm Saban spurrier Belechick

Name the many others?
Belichick? He never coached in college until he retired from the NFL. I think he may have been the ball boy for Navy when his dad coached there.

Barry Switzer, Jim Harbaugh, Dennis Green, Tom Coughlin.
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,380
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 851 times
Received High Fives: 1667 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

When the word "retread" is used it should be a bit more descriptive. On one side of the spectrum you have an older coach with grey hair that may have been away from the game for awhile try to make a comeback or you have a young guy (under 50) that may have had 1 poor stint at HC but has a good rep as a coordinator.

Maybe the young "retread" had circumstances out of his control in his one and only stint as HC and is deserving of another chance vs a good coordinator that has had 2 or more poor showings as a HC.

My point being I`m all for a younger enthusiastic coordinator getting his shot at HC and I am open for the same even if one has had 1 fail on their record......again evaluating their circumstances and interviewing to see what was learned with their poor experience prior.

Carry on
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 3):
raidersince63, rhumbob, Sloth_Fratelli
User avatar
HesterLayes
Posts: 6,208
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 33 times
Received High Fives: 236 times

Unread post by HesterLayes »

heavyD wrote: Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:43 am Reed got a more lucrative offer to cover the Commanders for the Washington Post and it looks like the Athletic won't find a replacement for him until the offseason. Covering the Raiders probably isn't the stuff of dreams for most talented writers unless you are fixated on writing stories about ineptitude, bad QB play, futility, coach hirings, followed by firings, rinse and repeat.
Reed sucked anyway and openly hated white people…f[raiders_icon]ck that guy
These users gave a High Five to the author HesterLayes for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Sloth_Fratelli
User avatar
rhumbob
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:47 am
Location: Cincinnati
Has given High Fives: 471 times
Received High Fives: 88 times

Unread post by rhumbob »

Xramfan wrote: Fri Jan 02, 2026 7:27 pm When the word "retread" is used it should be a bit more descriptive. On one side of the spectrum you have an older coach with grey hair that may have been away from the game for awhile try to make a comeback or you have a young guy (under 50) that may have had 1 poor stint at HC but has a good rep as a coordinator.

Maybe the young "retread" had circumstances out of his control in his one and only stint as HC and is deserving of another chance vs a good coordinator that has had 2 or more poor showings as a HC.

My point being I`m all for a younger enthusiastic coordinator getting his shot at HC and I am open for the same even if one has had 1 fail on their record......again evaluating their circumstances and interviewing to see what was learned with their poor experience prior.

Carry on
Agreed. I'd like to see Saleh. Bring some toughness back to the Raiders. Not the fake, beat your chest BS, but the kind of team that wins through sheer will when the going gets tough.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,338
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1078 times
Received High Fives: 594 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Bring in the Italian Stallion (Cignetti) with our golden boy Mendoza and make it a package deal. He may be the hottest coach out there. 5 years/$25 per guarantee.
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,029
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 381 times
Received High Fives: 274 times

Unread post by rcraider »

RI RAIDER wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 6:41 am Bring in the Italian Stallion (Cignetti) with our golden boy Mendoza and make it a package deal. He may be the hottest coach out there. 5 years/$25 per guarantee.
LOL your not even in the ballpark
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 927 times
Received High Fives: 2164 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports Raiders head coach Pete Carroll returning for a second season “would be a major surprise.”

One loss away from clinching the No. 1 overall pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, the Raiders seem ready to head into a full rebuild this offseason. Last offseason’s plan to bring in Carroll along with former Seahawks QB Geno Smith failed spectacularly. Carroll was brought in as a stabilizer after Antonio Pierce was fired after just one season, but the Raiders were arguably even more in disarray this year and it’s likely the 74-year-old coach will suffer the same fate. While the decision on Carroll will be made by Mark Davis, expect Raiders minority owner Tom Brady to have input on the next coach once the job presumably becomes available.


I know this upsets a couple posters here but.....oh well, deal with it.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
rcraider
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,029
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 381 times
Received High Fives: 274 times

Unread post by rcraider »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 7:48 am NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports Raiders head coach Pete Carroll returning for a second season “would be a major surprise.”

One loss away from clinching the No. 1 overall pick in the 2026 NFL Draft, the Raiders seem ready to head into a full rebuild this offseason. Last offseason’s plan to bring in Carroll along with former Seahawks QB Geno Smith failed spectacularly. Carroll was brought in as a stabilizer after Antonio Pierce was fired after just one season, but the Raiders were arguably even more in disarray this year and it’s likely the 74-year-old coach will suffer the same fate. While the decision on Carroll will be made by Mark Davis, expect Raiders minority owner Tom Brady to have input on the next coach once the job presumably becomes available.


I know this upsets a couple posters here but.....oh well, deal with it.
I hope they don't f[raiders_icon]ck around, press conference monday, Carroll relieved of his duties.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,042
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2053 times
Received High Fives: 2762 times

Unread post by chucker »

I guess it's possible that Carroll could be retained, but it seems unlikely and I definitely think it would be a bad decision. Hiring him in the first place was meh...... but it could only be to try to be competitive in the short term, which didn't happen. It's clear that it's a rebuild and a 74 year old coach just isn't the right guy for that. I do think we can be competitive quickly with the right coach and assuming that Mendoza is the right QB.

I guess I'm also assuming that we don't f[raiders_icon]ck everything up this weekend and somehow miss out on the first overall pick.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
Hellbound
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,732
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 623 times
Received High Fives: 1037 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

rcraider wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 7:51 am I hope they don't fck around, press conference monday, Carroll relieved of his duties.
Change it to Sunday and we have a deal!
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,029
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 381 times
Received High Fives: 274 times

Unread post by rcraider »

Hellbound wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 8:11 am Change it to Sunday and we have a deal!
Even better !
These users gave a High Five to the author rcraider for the post:
Hellbound
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,652
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1389 times

Unread post by DanKD »

RI RAIDER wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 6:41 am Bring in the Italian Stallion (Cignetti) with our golden boy Mendoza and make it a package deal. He may be the hottest coach out there. 5 years/$25 per guarantee.
21 years 923 million
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,060
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 256 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

chucker wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 7:52 am I guess it's possible that Carroll could be retained, but it seems unlikely and I definitely think it would be a bad decision. Hiring him in the first place was meh...... but it could only be to try to be competitive in the short term, which didn't happen. It's clear that it's a rebuild and a 74 year old coach just isn't the right guy for that. I do think we can be competitive quickly with the right coach and assuming that Mendoza is the right QB.

I guess I'm also assuming that we don't fck everything up this weekend and somehow miss out on the first overall pick.
There’s kind of an irony with Pete in that he’s probably done a great job positioning us to actually build something.

Normally a rebuild always starts with a brutal first year. Your first offseason is going to be about creating future cap, and your first season is really just securing the highest pick possible. It’s all gonna be hideous… but for a greater cause: the 2nd offseason. A top 3 pick and 120 million in cap space. If that’s stage 1 of a rebuild he’s nailed it.

It seems like the problem with Pete really just comes down to managing expectations. He was either delusional and legitimately surprised with the results… or too good of a salesmen that he just knowingly oversold junk stock.
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,732
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 623 times
Received High Fives: 1037 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

raiders93 wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 8:24 am There’s kind of an irony with Pete in that he’s probably done a great job positioning us to actually build something.

Normally a rebuild always starts with a brutal first year. Your first offseason is going to be about creating future cap, and your first season is really just securing the highest pick possible. It’s all gonna be hideous… but for a greater cause: the 2nd offseason. A top 3 pick and 120 million in cap space. If that’s stage 1 of a rebuild he’s nailed it.

It seems like the problem with Pete really just comes down to managing expectations. He was either delusional and legitimately surprised with the results… or too good of a salesmen that he just knowingly oversold junk stock.
Hiring and keeping his kids in the coaching positions that they were given
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
WNYRAIDER
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,060
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 256 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Hellbound wrote: Sat Jan 03, 2026 8:29 am Hiring and keeping his kids in the coaching positions that they were given
Nepotism is fairly common in the NFL. Obviously nepotism is not a good thing in really any industry and im not a fan of Brennan either. But this isn’t unique to Pete at all. Grudens son worked here too.
Post Reply