The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,588
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,791
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1090 times
Received High Fives: 1004 times

Unread post by Willmark »

DanKD wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 11:28 am Yep but you miss 100% of the shots you dont take

-DanKD. - Michael Scott. - Michael Jordan
That was Wayne Gretzky who said that first attributed to his dad.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post (total 2):
Xramfan, heavyD
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,620
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1347 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Thanks I fixed it
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

DanKD wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 9:52 am No chance unless jets pick #2"and they like a different qb. You do not pass up at potential franchise qb for anything
Youd just be delaying getting your qb 1 year. If you take their 1st this year (lets say #4 pick) and their 2 best firsts in 2027, you have enough capital to get the top OT in this year's draft and trade up in a better qb class to get the pick of the litter in 2027. We could even conceivably wind up with a top #3 pick next year and not even have to use those extra 1sts to get a franchise qb. That's the kind of trade that could drastically change our fortunes in a hurry.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
rcraider
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

DanKD wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 11:28 am Yep but you miss 100% of the shots you dont take

-DanKD. - Michael Scott. - Michael Jordan. - Willmark. - Wayne Gretzky.
Taking Mendoza also 100% guarantees that you whiff on taking a shot at a qb in 27.
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,588
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

No trade backs. Enough is enough
These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post (total 4):
GoodTimeCharlie, Willmark, mranquales, heavyD
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

The upside of that trade is that you still get a qb who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and you get 2 extra 1st round picks; and since the OL will be straightened out when you draft the qb, you get more use out of the qb's rookie deal. The downside of the trade is that you dont get a top 3 pick in 27 and you have to use those 2 extra 1sts to get a qb, who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and since you are still getting him 1 year later, you still get more use out of his rookie deal. Sounds like Im in the minority, but Im taking that deal.
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 820 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 1:48 pm The upside of that trade is that you still get a qb who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and you get 2 extra 1st round picks; and since the OL will be straightened out when you draft the qb, you get more use out of the qb's rookie deal. The downside of the trade is that you dont get a top 3 pick in 27 and you have to use those 2 extra 1sts to get a qb, who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and since you are still getting him 1 year later, you still get more use out of his rookie deal. Sounds like Im in the minority, but Im taking that deal.
I don’t think you get a qb equal to Mendoza. I think people underestimate his toughness and intelligence. Physical attributes many have but those 2 intangibles are rare
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,588
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 1:48 pm The upside of that trade is that you still get a qb who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and you get 2 extra 1st round picks; and since the OL will be straightened out when you draft the qb, you get more use out of the qb's rookie deal. The downside of the trade is that you dont get a top 3 pick in 27 and you have to use those 2 extra 1sts to get a qb, who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and since you are still getting him 1 year later, you still get more use out of his rookie deal. Sounds like Im in the minority, but Im taking that deal.
No. Build the lines and the team with other picks and in free agency because QB trumps them all.
These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 1:54 pm I don’t think you get a qb equal to Mendoza. I think people underestimate his toughness and intelligence. Physical attributes many have but those 2 intangibles are rare
Why is the consensus of opinion that next year's class is better and deeper? What has changed in the last 1-2 weeks? Other than the Heisman vote.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
rcraider
User avatar
raiders72
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 81 times

Unread post by raiders72 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 12:56 pm Winning a 3rd game drops us to #7, ahead only of Arizona. To get back to #2 from there would require 4-5 of the other lowlifes to win another game.
Well f’in said!
Tank tank tank, no reason to win another game!
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,306
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 297 times
Received High Fives: 820 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 2:03 pm Why is the consensus of opinion that next year's class is better and deeper? What has changed in the last 1-2 weeks? Other than the Heisman vote.
Because it’s all opinion. Dolphins took Tua over Herbert. The consensus is routinely wrong. I’m routinely wrong. I’ve also been right. Who knows. I’m stating my opinion on a message board. I think intelligence and toughness can be overlooked for physical traits
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post (total 5):
chucker, raider_kin, 16 to 88, Dr Death, heavyD
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,123
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 974 times
Received High Fives: 588 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 2:03 pm Why is the consensus of opinion that next year's class is better and deeper? What has changed in the last 1-2 weeks? Other than the Heisman vote.
Last season all I heard was next year is the most loaded QB class in ages. 90% of them flamed out. Now it's wait till next year again. If they feel Mendoza is their guy don't f[raiders_icon]ck around just get him.
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post (total 6):
chucker, Willmark, Dr Death, heavyD, Trainnvain, raiderboyron
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,231
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 327 times
Received High Fives: 386 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Tue Dec 16, 2025 5:11 pm Appreciation for one’s consistency is greatly influenced by what one is consistent at.

I appreciate that the pipes under my toilet take shit away.

You on the other hand only bring shit takes.
I inspect homes, and other stuff, for a living, and have for 25 years, and that is the first time I had ever heard it explained in just that way.

...that is all.....
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,620
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1347 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 1:48 pm The upside of that trade is that you still get a qb who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and you get 2 extra 1st round picks; and since the OL will be straightened out when you draft the qb, you get more use out of the qb's rookie deal. The downside of the trade is that you dont get a top 3 pick in 27 and you have to use those 2 extra 1sts to get a qb, who will be at least equal to Mendoza; and since you are still getting him 1 year later, you still get more use out of his rookie deal. Sounds like Im in the minority, but Im taking that deal.
Scouts say the nationwide peewee league has some great 8 year old prospects. Maybe we can wait until the 2039 draft and grab the 3rd grader who is currently balling out.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 2:45 pm Because it’s all opinion. Dolphins took Tua over Herbert. The consensus is routinely wrong. I’m routinely wrong. I’ve also been right. Who knows. I’m stating my opinion on a message board. I think intelligence and toughness can be overlooked for physical traits
OK. Let me ask it a different way. In all the draft classes that you can remember, in what percentage was the top qb better than Mendoza? Im just trying to get some sense of how rare Mendoza is.
Post Reply