The Off. Line - Complaints, Fixes, Questions, Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 115 times

The Off. Line - Complaints, Fixes, Questions, Draft

Unread post by erickench »

Mike Tice once said while coaching for the Raiders: “If you look at the offense like a fancy car, the offensive line is the engine. Even though we might have nice spinners and nice rims and tinted windows and some neat paint job, it doesn’t mean crap without the engine. If the engine’s not working, the car might look like a pretty nice car, but it’s a piece of crap.” And he was 100% right. I wish we had him back. Changes must be made on the O-line. Charles Grant is a very athletic lineman. We should give him some reps at right tackle. Bring back Powers-Johnson as the starter at center. Parham has got to go. Maybe we should consider moving Meredith back to guard. He did so well there last year. :cuss:
These users gave a High Five to the author erickench for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, mranquales
User avatar
erickench
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 115 times

Unread post by erickench »

Putnam is in there for the brains. Not the quickness. HA HA
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Riddle me this Batman. How is our Oline like a vacuum cleaner?
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, raider_kin
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 339 times
Received High Fives: 865 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

This is probably the worst line I can remember.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
rich72
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 62 times
Received High Fives: 197 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

The line was really bad because under Chip Kelly; the Raiders played mostly in shotgun formation meaning offensive line was mostly in pass protection; hopefully Olsen will play a lot more I formation and actually run the ball more and get the line pushing downhill….

Also need to dumb down the playbook
User avatar
rhumbob
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:47 am
Location: Cincinnati
Has given High Fives: 467 times
Received High Fives: 88 times

Unread post by rhumbob »

LayneStaley wrote: Tue Oct 14, 2025 11:40 am

I’d rather have him than Pete’s kid.
They wanted to keep Bill. They fired his son as head coach and Bill told them to pound salt.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,330
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1066 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

We have 2 guys that are capable and the rest of our OL are division 3 college types. Coaching definitely blows but you can not turn shit into ice cream. Why are we wasting valuable time with players like Parham? Sit this turd down. He should never play for the Raiders again. He is a stiff and a whiff.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

SuperRaider wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 3:58 am The line was really bad because under Chip Kelly; the Raiders played mostly in shotgun formation meaning offensive line was mostly in pass protection; hopefully Olsen will play a lot more I formation and actually run the ball more and get the line pushing downhill….

Also need to dumb down the playbook
The playbook is fine, like many teams the formations is the bread and butter. You can call the same play from multiple sets. I want to see us call 80% or more under center but the line being so bad makes that tough to pull off. Presnap motion more often could help Geno with reading the defense but again with the line being so bad it makes the defenses just play straight up so we actually know before hand what is coming. Teams can blitz fewer times on us with the same results.
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,333
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 135 times
Received High Fives: 729 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

RI RAIDER wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 5:00 am We have 2 guys that are capable and the rest of our OL are division 3 college types. Coaching definitely blows but you can not turn shit into ice cream. Why are we wasting valuable time with players like Parham? Sit this turd down. He should never play for the Raiders again. He is a stiff and a whiff.
While I won’t call him names, I agree that Parham is a well below par NFL lineman. I think they have inflated his size on the roster too. He is listed as 6’2” and 332 pounds. No way. I looked it up and he played at 285 while at Memphis and gained to 311 for the draft. I have been unimpressed since his first game; he was over drafted and is not starting material. I am concerned about JPJ too. But that’s another story.
User avatar
Oaktownonly
Posts: 3,709
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
Has given High Fives: 430 times
Received High Fives: 410 times

Unread post by Oaktownonly »

SuperRaider wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 3:58 am The line was really bad because under Chip Kelly; the Raiders played mostly in shotgun formation meaning offensive line was mostly in pass protection; hopefully Olsen will play a lot more I formation and actually run the ball more and get the line pushing downhill….

Also need to dumb down the playbook
For "I" formation you need a fullback. Do we have a fullback?
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 119 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

Oaktownonly wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 8:14 am For "I" formation you need a fullback. Do we have a fullback?
Runyon, possibly Mayer. Carroll has used FBs in Seattle, so maybe we bring one in.
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 119 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 7:26 am While I won’t call him names, I agree that Parham is a well below par NFL lineman. I think they have inflated his size on the roster too. He is listed as 6’2” and 332 pounds. No way. I looked it up and he played at 285 while at Memphis and gained to 311 for the draft. I have been unimpressed since his first game; he was over drafted and is not starting material. I am concerned about JPJ too. But that’s another story.
If we surround JPJ with a couple monsters, maybe one being DJ Glaze and sign a free agent as the 2nd guard.
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,307
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 296 times
Received High Fives: 817 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

I like JPJ. However he plays dumb and is oft injured. He can’t be counted on as a major piece right now.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
rhumbob
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,713
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 496 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

RI RAIDER wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 5:00 am We have 2 guys that are capable and the rest of our OL are division 3 college types. Coaching definitely blows but you can not turn shit into ice cream. Why are we wasting valuable time with players like Parham? Sit this turd down. He should never play for the Raiders again. He is a stiff and a whiff.
And those 2 are injury prone and/or old. In 2-3 years we will need 5 starters none of whom are currently on the roster.
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
rhumbob
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,333
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 135 times
Received High Fives: 729 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Wed Nov 26, 2025 9:41 am And those 2 are injury prone and/or old. In 2-3 years we will need 5 starters none of whom are currently on the roster.
So you are suggesting a complete rebuilding/makeover of the offensive line. I agree. D-line too except of Maxx. I was in favor of trading Maxx this year in order to start the process. But, now I am thinking maybe the current braintrust of the team is not capable of making good use of the extra picks. Perhaps John Schneider was to Pete Carroll as Ron Wolf was to Al Davis.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post:
ELCAraiderfan
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,672
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 177 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by heavyD »

The bright side is that the brain trust didn't sign any high priced free agent offensive linemen that contributed to this mess. I expect that will be a different story in 2026 free agency where the Raiders will take runs at the top linemen available. With a good free agency, draft, and healthy Miller and JPJ this unit should improve next season providing Brennan Carroll isn't still employed by the team.
Post Reply