Game day thread: Browns@Raiders

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,346
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 136 times
Received High Fives: 751 times

Game day thread: Browns@Raiders

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Oh yeah- there’s a game today. I almost forgot. Unfortunately I think we lower our draft picks and win one in a squeaker. Gino will have his best game since game #1. Yes a contrarian feeling. I think we might see a rookie offensive lineman or two play also. What can that hurt at this point? Raider 20 Browns 17.

I am playing golf so will check it out when I get home.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 2):
EaglevShark, Dr Death
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,715
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 356 times
Received High Fives: 847 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,314
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 2:22 am Definitely would have used a 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder on drafting Sander;

First time Sander played a full game and Raiders do have a fairly decent defense and did ok….
Sanders isn’t good. It’s easy for a quarterback when the opposing team only scores three points. You’re never pressed you never feel rushed. He did have one great throw. So do most qbs.
User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 122 times
Received High Fives: 326 times

Unread post by DrDUne »

User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,623
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 888 times
Received High Fives: 282 times

Unread post by mranquales »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 2:22 am Definitely would have used a 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder on drafting Sander;

First time Sander played a full game and Raiders do have a fairly decent defense and did ok….
:rofl: Don't mind these low football IQ guys. Their hate for Sanders was so deep they thought the Raiders were going to beat the #2 defense in the NFL.

All the Browns need is a solid game-manager and they're a wildcard team.
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 695
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 62 times
Received High Fives: 197 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 9:33 am Sanders isn’t good. It’s easy for a quarterback when the opposing team only scores three points. You’re never pressed you never feel rushed. He did have one great throw. So do most qbs.
You maybe right; but look at most of Raiders draft picks anyway; most of the guys that get drafted by Raiders over last few years are not on the team anyway….so in my opinion Sanders would have been a good draft pick to use and see if he really can become an NFL QB….if it work for the raiders and he became a star; then that great; if he bomb out; would not made a difference as most of the raider picks bomb out anyway
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,314
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:07 pm You maybe right; but look at most of Raiders draft picks anyway; most of the guys that get drafted by Raiders over last few years are not on the team anyway….so in my opinion Sanders would have been a good draft pick to use and see if he really can become an NFL QB….if it work for the raiders and he became a star; then that great; if he bomb out; would not made a difference as most of the raider picks bomb out anyway
Taking a flyer on a player sure. Bringing him and his circus? No thank you. The guy had one great throw. One screen pass behind the line of scrimmage that went for almost 1/3 of his total yardage. With the exception of those 2 plays he was absolute garbage
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
Hellbound
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 10:23 am :rofl: Don't mind these low football IQ guys. Their hate for Sanders was so deep they thought the Raiders were going to beat the #2 defense in the NFL.

All the Browns need is a solid game-manager and they're a wildcard team.
He has played two games, and you called him a franchise QB after his second game. So who has a questionable football IQ? Nobody on the f[raiders_icon]cking planet except for you is calling a guy two games into their career a franchise QB, especially after he shit the bed in his first game and he played 50% ball in his second.

Again, you are playing the game but your deck is definitely shorted
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,623
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 888 times
Received High Fives: 282 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:30 pm He has played two games, and you called him a franchise QB after his second game. So who has a questionable football IQ? Nobody on the fcking planet except for you is calling a guy two games into their career a franchise QB, especially after he shit the bed in his first game and he played 50% ball in his second.

Again, you are playing the game but your deck is definitely shorted
Franchise QB doesn't mean Top 5, genius. It simply means he's the guy for the (Browns). Someone that the (Browns) can trot out there for the next 5-10 years and improve the rest of the roster while pushing for a wildcard berth. Every team has different needs.

The Browns have one of the best defenses in the NFL, a defense that can win you the game on their own. They don't need a superstar QB, they need a Jalen Hurts type, which Sanders definitely can be.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:36 pm Franchise QB doesn't mean Top 5, genius. It simply means he's the guy for the (Browns). Someone that the (Browns) can trot out there for the next 5-10 years and improve the rest of the roster while pushing for a wildcard berth. Every team has different needs.

The Browns have one of the best defenses in the NFL, a defense that can win you the game on their own. They don't need a superstar QB, they need a Jalen Hurts type, which Sanders definitely can be.
You define it how you like, but what we saw was not a franchise QB after two games, period so your definition is f[raiders_icon]cked up. And you talk about guys with low football IQs? Look in a f[raiders_icon]cking mirror junior. You went from the QB to the defense to justify that f[raiders_icon]cked up first game and mediocre second game and still call him a franchise QB. Find one guy who is not a browns fan or Deion Sanders who calls him a franchise QB. No reporter, no coach, no commentator gives that designation to a guy after those two games.

Sure you can say the defense is going to give him some wins but that does not make him a franchise QB. And yes, franchise QB is a term that is used for top QBs in the league. As in top 10 consistent guys. And that is pretty much the universal view of that term.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
raidersince66
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,655
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1392 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Shauder's QB rating is 52, QBR is 4.5 and his advanced metrics are awful. That's a tiny sample size but anointing him anything is hysterical.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,623
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 888 times
Received High Fives: 282 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 1:45 pm You define it how you like, but what we saw was not a franchise QB after two games, period so your definition is fcked up.
Sigh...

I'm starting to think you're doing this on purpose.
Find one guy who is not a browns fan or Deion Sanders who calls him a franchise QB. No reporter, no coach, no commentator gives that designation to a guy after those two games.
Skip Bayless.

Mel Kiper.
And yes, franchise QB is a term that is used for top QBs in the league. As in top 10 consistent guys. And that is pretty much the universal view of that term.
:rofl: That's not true at all. Derek Carr was ranked outside of the top 10 and was the Raiders franchise QB. Jalen Hurts is a franchise QB. Back when Matthew Stafford didn't have a ring, and was in the shadow of the Drews, the Mannings, and the Bradys, he was a franchise QB for the Lions.

You don't have to be the top 10 best QB in the entire NFL to be a franchise QB. You're the first person I've ever heard even insinuate that. A franchise QB is simply a mainstay for that franchise.
These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post:
raidersince66
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Show me where Skip Bayless or Kiper said he is a franchise QB after his second game.

Be specific. I want time and date. It would be on their articles. You are referring to their draft comments where they said he had franchise QB potential. NOBODY said that after last Sunday. And Carr was not widely considered "A" franchise QB as a QB ranking

Keep trying skippy.
User avatar
3rd and Long
Posts: 1,030
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:26 am
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 70 times

Unread post by 3rd and Long »

DrDUne wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 9:34 am
Not sure if I want to laugh or cry. f[raiders_icon]cking brutal
User avatar
raidersince66
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:52 pm
Has given High Fives: 7 times

Unread post by raidersince66 »

Death, taxes, and same stilted conversations and same abrasive, insulting, condescending individual.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,723
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 224 times
Received High Fives: 504 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

3rd and Long wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 4:20 pm Not sure if I want to laugh or cry. fcking brutal
Can I get some maple syrup with that.
Post Reply