Sunday funday game thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,320
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 207 times
Received High Fives: 436 times

Sunday funday game thread

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

Since the Raiders are playing the Cowboys at home on Monday Night this week.

That means we have a Sunday of free football.

The coverage map this week.
https://506sports.com/nfl.php?yr=2025&wk=11
These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post (total 2):
rich72, raider_kin
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:31 pm 4 ugly INTs by Darnold. Just bad decisions in a big game. He needs to prove he can maintain elite play late in the season and esp against good teams.
It was bad for sure. You want to be the guy? Be the guy when you are up against the best. But other than Baker, who looked good in a loss, he is proving to be as billed.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,719
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 618 times
Received High Fives: 1032 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:31 pm 4 ugly INTs by Darnold. Just bad decisions in a big game. He needs to prove he can maintain elite play late in the season and esp against good teams.
That was my biggest issue with him. He put up numbers last year in Minnesota until it mattered or against a defense with a pulse. He's doing it again this year with 7 turnovers in his last two games. Give me the qb who might not have the flashy numbers but doesn't shit the bed when it counts. Od take a guy like Baker or Hurts 10/10 over a Darnold
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2143 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Hellbound wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:46 am That was my biggest issue with him. He put up numbers last year in Minnesota until it mattered or against a defense with a pulse. He's doing it again this year with 7 turnovers in his last two games. Give me the qb who might not have the flashy numbers but doesn't shit the bed when it counts. Od take a guy like Baker or Hurts 10/10 over a Darnold
I wanted Darnold, while acknowledging the risks. That's no secret. And I'll die on the hill that Darnold over Geno was the better option for multiple reasons. But I'm also a realist and the reality is he was BAD yesterday. All 4 of those INTs were directly on him. Still a lot of season left to play but that was ugly and he needs to play better when it counts.
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,719
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 618 times
Received High Fives: 1032 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 5:03 am I wanted Darnold, while acknowledging the risks. That's no secret. And I'll die on the hill that Darnold over Geno was the better option for multiple reasons. But I'm also a realist and the reality is he was BAD yesterday. All 4 of those INTs were directly on him. Still a lot of season left to play but that was ugly and he needs to play better when it counts.
I didn't really want either qb but if I absolutely had to pick between the two it would've been Darnold. Never cared for Geno at all (though I tried talking myself into it being a good move) and thought it was a meh at best move. Darnold was the better choice of the two BUT imo, he doesn't have the numbers or wins here that he does in Seattle and we'd still be talking about getting a franchise qb
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Not going to bash on Sanders, he went in cold due to an injury. This was his first action in a real game. Yes, he crapped the bed and he looked terrible. The intentional grounding play was flat out garbage, and he took sacks he should never have taken. That said, the game is fast and he was way slow at processing.

These are things rookies go through. Manning's first action he was flat out horrible. I am not saying Sanders could ever be Manning but he made rookie mistakes. Did I want him? I was intrigued but the skill set and I still think he can be a viable NFL QB but to be honest, I do not think he prepared to be ready to go into the game. I think he was content to get paid his paycheck and watch the game. Well, Sanders, welcome to the NFL where it could be not for long if you don't start preparing to be a NFL QB.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,796
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1084 times
Received High Fives: 1001 times

Unread post by Willmark »

I agree it’s one game but after the nuclear meltdowns about him going in the 5th in the spring on the web it does raise several questions and they have now gotten louder.

I personally don’t like or dislike him but also didn’t want him as our QB.

The biggest question is the same one I had at the draft, if his last name wasn’t Sanders would this even be a conversation?
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
Attyla
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,105
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 502 times
Received High Fives: 644 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

mranquales wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 5:41 pm Garrett had 4 sacks for his team, to give them a chance.

Wish we had someone like that...

Maxx almost beat da Bears single handily. If he could play QB probably win by two scores
Post Reply