Geno Smith Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Geno Smith Thread

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

:party:
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

The fact that this beady eyed MF'er is getting 66 million guaranteed is nauseating to say the least!
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 2):
RI RAIDER, Hellbound
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,327
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1062 times
Received High Fives: 584 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

pfish57 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 7:52 am The fact that this beady eyed MF'er is getting 66 million guaranteed is nauseating to say the least!

I hate this f[raiders_icon]cker as that presser did it for me. This guy does not give a f[raiders_icon]ck about the team and is a finger pointer. He is the furthest thing from a leader which is why the supposed conflict with Max may be true.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,686
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1108 times
Received High Fives: 573 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:20 pm Lol but but but there's actual real life humans that think Geno will be our QB next year smh.
There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.

No one is letting a good QB go, and no rookie is any kind of guarantee. If I have one big complaint about the NFL it's that the QB position is too important. It's always been the case that a good QB is the best weapon to have, but teams have done well with a middling guy under center too.

Build the team and at least give us a punchers chance. It's happened before. It's not likely but there are no better options.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,715
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1027 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Opoponax50 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 8:40 am There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.

No one is letting a good QB go, and no rookie is any kind of guarantee. If I have one big complaint about the NFL it's that the QB position is too important. It's always been the case that a good QB is the best weapon to have, but teams have done well with a middling guy under center too.

Build the team and at least give us a punchers chance. It's happened before. It's not likely but there are no better options.
:100: Some people can't or won't differentiate the two
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Hellbound wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 9:54 am :100: Some people can't or won't differentiate the two
Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,715
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1027 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Hellbound wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!
That's what I thought.

So stop being a troll and being unnecessarily repetitive just to look cool.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
I think it will be a rookie that starts week 1. Who exactly that is, I'll need a few more weeks for that.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

raider_kin wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 5:55 pm Lets go brandon
I did a double take too. :rofl:
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,709
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 223 times
Received High Fives: 493 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:22 am I think it will be a rookie that starts week 1. Who exactly that is, I'll need a few more weeks for that.
Based on the college season so far, do you see a qb that will be NFL-ready week 1? And if there is, do you see this team giving up 3 #1's to get him?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:31 am Based on the college season so far, do you see a qb that will be NFL-ready week 1? And if there is, do you see this team giving up 3 #1's to get him?
I'm on record stating that any of the top 5-10 rookie QBs likely have a better chance to give this team success than AO12, Pickett, Geno or Kyler Murray with the added bonus being their age and rookie contract. As for trading three 1s, I've been very clear that if there is a QB that Spytek thinks could be a franchise QB (not saying there is one), they are priceless. Exactly why i wanted to trade Maxx. But we wont have to trade at all if we end up with the 1st pick.
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,273
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4330 times
Received High Fives: 1119 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Dr Death wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:20 am AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.
See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,620
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1349 times

Unread post by DanKD »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:23 am See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.
I at least think AOC is likeable. I didn't really folkow him with the hawks but now that hes on my team, Geno isnt even likeable.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
Dr Death
Post Reply