Geno Smith Thread
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,327
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1062 times
- Received High Fives: 584 times
pfish57 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 7:52 am The fact that this beady eyed MF'er is getting 66 million guaranteed is nauseating to say the least!
I hate this f[raiders_icon]cker as that presser did it for me. This guy does not give a f[raiders_icon]ck about the team and is a finger pointer. He is the furthest thing from a leader which is why the supposed conflict with Max may be true.
- Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,686
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 1108 times
- Received High Fives: 573 times
There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 3:20 pm Lol but but but there's actual real life humans that think Geno will be our QB next year smh.
No one is letting a good QB go, and no rookie is any kind of guarantee. If I have one big complaint about the NFL it's that the QB position is too important. It's always been the case that a good QB is the best weapon to have, but teams have done well with a middling guy under center too.
Build the team and at least give us a punchers chance. It's happened before. It's not likely but there are no better options.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
- Dr Death
-
Hellbound
- Posts: 6,715
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Has given High Fives: 615 times
- Received High Fives: 1027 times
Opoponax50 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 8:40 am There's a difference between whether he will be the QB and whether he should. I guess it's worth giving O'Connell another shot. He seems like a likable guy and maybe with two entire years in the same system he might do alright. The benefit of the doubt I give him is that he's now been in three different systems in three years. Other than that, we won't have many other options.
No one is letting a good QB go, and no rookie is any kind of guarantee. If I have one big complaint about the NFL it's that the QB position is too important. It's always been the case that a good QB is the best weapon to have, but teams have done well with a middling guy under center too.
Build the team and at least give us a punchers chance. It's happened before. It's not likely but there are no better options.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
-
Hellbound
- Posts: 6,715
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Has given High Fives: 615 times
- Received High Fives: 1027 times
Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,709
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 223 times
- Received High Fives: 493 times
Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:08 am Dude stop. I already asked you numerous times to put your money where your mouth is and you puss'd out. You can spin it no matter how you want. Geno Smith won't be nor should he be our QB. There's no differentiation needed. That better?
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
That's what I thought.Hellbound wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Yep. I pussed out over some rando on the internet wanting me to bet imaginary money on a Raiders message board. You got me!
So stop being a troll and being unnecessarily repetitive just to look cool.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
I think it will be a rookie that starts week 1. Who exactly that is, I'll need a few more weeks for that.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,709
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 223 times
- Received High Fives: 493 times
I did a double take too.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
- raider_kin
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,709
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 223 times
- Received High Fives: 493 times
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
I'm on record stating that any of the top 5-10 rookie QBs likely have a better chance to give this team success than AO12, Pickett, Geno or Kyler Murray with the added bonus being their age and rookie contract. As for trading three 1s, I've been very clear that if there is a QB that Spytek thinks could be a franchise QB (not saying there is one), they are priceless. Exactly why i wanted to trade Maxx. But we wont have to trade at all if we end up with the 1st pick.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:31 am Based on the college season so far, do you see a qb that will be NFL-ready week 1? And if there is, do you see this team giving up 3 #1's to get him?
-
Dr Death
- Posts: 4,273
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 4330 times
- Received High Fives: 1119 times
AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:16 am Who will it be? AOC, Pickett, a rookie or another retread?
- These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
- mranquales
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 917 times
- Received High Fives: 2144 times
See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.Dr Death wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:20 am AOC I hope. Pickett sucks. We can lose with either, but I'd rather lose with our own draft pick than with a Squeelers cast off.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,620
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1349 times
I at least think AOC is likeable. I didn't really folkow him with the hawks but now that hes on my team, Geno isnt even likeable.BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 11:23 am See, A012 is on the same level as Geno for me. Why would anyone want to see him under center? We know what he is. Trash. Same with Pickett.