Around the NFL
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,417
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 339 times
- Received High Fives: 865 times
Around the NFL
No clue where to post some stuff not necessarily team related but could be? Feel free to delete if this belongs somewhere else.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
Maxx and Parsons would be nasty. I probably wouldn’t pay the price though.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,285
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 922 times
- Received High Fives: 2143 times
Parsons is young. He didn't need to make us a contender right now. Lot different than Trey. But doesn't matter now. Jerry went ahead and traded him within the conference. SmhDr Death wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:48 pm No thanks. If we were that close to contending, sure. We need the picks to build the team. Parsons won't make us a contender right now.
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,838
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 170 times
- Received High Fives: 412 times
2 1st rounders by the Packers is a hella lot different from say 2 1st rounders by the Raiders.
Pack helped themselves greatly. Ol Jerra will just blow the picks anyways.
Pack helped themselves greatly. Ol Jerra will just blow the picks anyways.
- Atlasffa
- Posts: 13,131
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
- Location: Just Win Baby!
- Has given High Fives: 183 times
- Received High Fives: 749 times
Wow. I didn't think he would trade him. LOL Jerry must be big mad at Parsons.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:11 pm Parsons is young. He didn't need to make us a contender right now. Lot different than Trey. But doesn't matter now. Jerry went ahead and traded him within the conference. Smh
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,713
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 223 times
- Received High Fives: 496 times
You're referring to how a psychologist or a psychiatrist would use that term to describe the actions of a narcissist. Over the years the term, "gaslighting", has been expropriated by common culture; its meaning broadened and reapplied to non-mental health contexts. Im sure you've seen it many times used in political contexts, for example. It is in that sense that I am using the word. But my snark meter has told me that you were already aware of that. But if you insist on being a purist, then just substitute propagandizing for gaslighting.Trainnvain wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 1:10 pm Mark Davis is emotionally abusing you by making you persistently question your perception of reality? Gaslighting is a personal interpretation of another's behavior towards you, in other words, it's not strictly objective; it relies on one's interpretation of another's motives.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,285
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 922 times
- Received High Fives: 2143 times
Yep. I just don't get it from the Cowboys perspective. It's not like they need those picks for a QB. I mean did the relationship really deteriorate that bad? I thought we were dysfunctional but I don't know how anyone can be a fan of the Cowboys as of late.Atlasffa wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:23 pm Wow. I didn't think he would trade him. LOL Jerry must be big mad at Parsons.
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,198
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 46 times
- Received High Fives: 443 times
Jerry always looked up to Al. So he's just following in Al's final days senilityBoKnows81 wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:32 pm Yep. I just don't get it from the Cowboys perspective. It's not like they need those picks for a QB. I mean did the relationship really deteriorate that bad? I thought we were dysfunctional but I don't know how anyone can be a fan of the Cowboys as of late.
- Atlasffa
- Posts: 13,131
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
- Location: Just Win Baby!
- Has given High Fives: 183 times
- Received High Fives: 749 times
The all-knowing Grok is familiar with gaslighting:
The word "gaslighting" originates from Patrick Hamilton's 1938 play Gas Light, which was later adapted into a 1944 film starring Ingrid Bergman. The story features a husband who manipulates his wife into believing she is going insane by secretly dimming their gaslights and then denying that the lights are changing, forcing her to question her own perception of reality.
"Gaslight" is an excellent movie. Since it's the source of the term, you get the idea of what is meant by "gaslighting." Publishing lies and implying or stating lies are truth is gaslighting. Lots of that going around on the internet.
The word "gaslighting" originates from Patrick Hamilton's 1938 play Gas Light, which was later adapted into a 1944 film starring Ingrid Bergman. The story features a husband who manipulates his wife into believing she is going insane by secretly dimming their gaslights and then denying that the lights are changing, forcing her to question her own perception of reality.
"Gaslight" is an excellent movie. Since it's the source of the term, you get the idea of what is meant by "gaslighting." Publishing lies and implying or stating lies are truth is gaslighting. Lots of that going around on the internet.
- Trainnvain
- Posts: 1,435
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
- Has given High Fives: 245 times
- Received High Fives: 174 times
I agree with you here, the term is overused and misapplied, often used by people to redirect responsibility for their emotions/ feelings away from oneself and towards another (100% guilty on the snarkiness- there’s at least a hint in almost every post. Almost always meant in good humor!).Cheers!Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:24 pm You're referring to how a psychologist or a psychiatrist would use that term to describe the actions of a narcissist. Over the years the term, "gaslighting", has been expropriated by common culture; its meaning broadened and reapplied to non-mental health contexts. Im sure you've seen it many times used in political contexts, for example. It is in that sense that I am using the word. But my snark meter has told me that you were already aware of that. But if you insist on being a purist, then just substitute propagandizing for gaslighting.
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,709
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1865 times
- Received High Fives: 1150 times
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,838
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 170 times
- Received High Fives: 412 times
Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:24 pm You're referring to how a psychologist or a psychiatrist would use that term to describe the actions of a narcissist. Over the years the term, "gaslighting", has been expropriated by common culture; its meaning broadened and reapplied to non-mental health contexts. Im sure you've seen it many times used in political contexts, for example. It is in that sense that I am using the word. But my snark meter has told me that you were already aware of that. But if you insist on being a purist, then just substitute propagandizing for gaslighting.
You would have been great in the movie..My Cousin Vinnie.
- Atlasffa
- Posts: 13,131
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
- Location: Just Win Baby!
- Has given High Fives: 183 times
- Received High Fives: 749 times
Jerry was trying to get Parsons to sign a deal without the agent's involvement. Parsons refused and the standoff began. It's kinda (well, maybe very) slimy of Jerry to negotiate directly with Parsons. Some dirty laundry was starting to come out so it looks like Jerry capitulated. And you are right--how does this team continue to be called America's team when they are nothing but a PR machine.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Aug 28, 2025 2:32 pm Yep. I just don't get it from the Cowboys perspective. It's not like they need those picks for a QB. I mean did the relationship really deteriorate that bad? I thought we were dysfunctional but I don't know how anyone can be a fan of the Cowboys as of late.
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,417
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 339 times
- Received High Fives: 865 times
At least he wasn’t traded to the other AFC West teams.
- These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
- Rabidraider
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1239 times
- Received High Fives: 2977 times
cowboys raped the packers.
glad it was not us
glad it was not us
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
- NoThanksSir, Sloth_Fratelli
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,709
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1865 times
- Received High Fives: 1150 times
Excellent point. Any AFC West team not us would probably win the division.