Geno Smith Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 928 times
Received High Fives: 2164 times

Geno Smith Thread

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

:party:
User avatar
BigJerk
Posts: 13,109
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:34 pm
Received High Fives: 2 times

Unread post by BigJerk »

Exsqueeeze me if I missed it ... But what are the details of Geno's contract?
User avatar
Kwk2293
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 5:56 am

Unread post by Kwk2293 »

[quote=BigJerk post_id=1279433]Exsqueeeze me if I missed it ... But what are the details of Geno's contract?[/quote]their hasnt been a new one with the raiders. current one i believe is 1 year 33 mill i think
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,838
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 170 times
Received High Fives: 412 times

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

LOSER: SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

In a vacuum, Seattle’s plan is clear. Get younger at quarterback, believe in the offensive system, and build around the third-year receiver who had an excellent second half of 2024. In practice? I’m not so sure.

Seattle traded away Geno Smith and DK Metcalf. The Smith deal brought back a third-round pick from the Las Vegas Raiders, and the Seahawks got a second-round pick from the Steelers in exchange for Metcalf. In both cases, the Seahawks got draft capital for players they were not interested in extending at the price the players were looking for. Metcalf already signed a $150-million extension, and we’re still waiting on what is expected to be a $40-$45 million per year deal for Smith with Las Vegas.

To replace Smith, the Seahawks signed Sam Darnold to a three-year, $110.5 million deal with $55 million guaranteed. That price tag is less than what had been thrown around in reports early in the offseason. It’s still a bit of a commitment from Seattle, but with just $55 million guaranteed, it’s not something that will sink the Seahawks for multiple years if it fails.

The deal does place a lot of faith in Klint Kubiak and the offensive system to both cover up the offensive line and keep Darnold from his worst tendencies under pressure. Even if that plays out to its best-case scenario, there’s still a much smaller margin for error to support the quarterback who still only finished 16th in EPA per play in 2024 despite his ideal surroundings.

The potential for this to fail feels much higher than the probability of Darnold repeating or surpassing his performance last year.
User avatar
BigJerk
Posts: 13,109
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:34 pm
Received High Fives: 2 times

Unread post by BigJerk »

[quote=Kwk2293 post_id=1279439]their hasnt been a new one with the raiders. current one i believe is 1 year 33 mill i think[/quote]Yeah, from what i see he had 1 yr $31 mil left on his contract.
Hope we can keep him below $40 mil a year.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,424
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 338 times
Received High Fives: 863 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

[quote=BigJerk post_id=1279481]Yeah, from what i see he had 1 yr $31 mil left on his contract.
Hope we can keep him below $40 mil a year.[/quote]I think people are gonna get sticker shock when it’s released. My guess is 4/175 with 100 guaranteed.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,068
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 753 times
Received High Fives: 1169 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

Well, the Seattle faithful seem to be cautiously guarded about the Darnold signing. Big risk.
User avatar
Bram_Raider
Posts: 3,287
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 1:09 pm

Unread post by Bram_Raider »

Seems bleedin' odd that we have not got a new contract worked out. Would have thought that would be part of trading for him.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,340
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1079 times
Received High Fives: 596 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

I read an article from someone (sorry I do not remember) who liked the trade. He also suggested that the Raiders should not be in a rush to give Gino a new contract. He thought they should see how he performs first. Worst case, he said we would get our pick back (comp) if he bolts. I am not advocating doing this, but I think we should be cautious with the terms we offer. Lots of rumors about the terms Gino would not agree to in Seattle (whether true or not).
User avatar
Raider727
Posts: 5,832
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
Location: Somewhere drinking tangy 🍊
Has given High Fives: 36 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by Raider727 »

Now that Darnold signed with Seattle, the Raiders will get to compare Geno and Darnold next season even more.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,424
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 338 times
Received High Fives: 863 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,015
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 484 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

[quote=Bram_Raider post_id=1279503]Seems bleedin' odd that we have not got a new contract worked out. Would have thought that would be part of trading for him.[/quote]Is it possible they have a few scenarios on the table predicated to how FA turns out?
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1232 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

"We don't know what we don't know".
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,853
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 794 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Over the last three years Geno ranks as #1 in on target passing percentage (Mina Kimes) and he also has the most long TD passes, not sure what yardage that covers. We should be looking to add a big WR that can stretch the field.
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,853
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 794 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

[quote=Jeevo post_id=1279629]Over the last three years Geno ranks as #1 in on target passing percentage (Mina Kimes) and he also has the most long TD passes, not sure what yardage that covers. His deep ball definitely passes the eye test. We should be looking to add a big WR that can stretch the field.[/quote]
User avatar
DeathStar24
Posts: 1,098
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
Location: PA
Has given High Fives: 52 times
Received High Fives: 190 times

Unread post by DeathStar24 »

Might be a few sites, at least one in particular, who said Sanders comp was Geno Smith. Might even have been Todd McShay. Pure speculation on my part but I wonder if the trade had anything to do with the potential of drafting Sanders?

Personally I don't think they go QB at 6, this is just some food for thought.
Post Reply