Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,343
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 210 times
Received High Fives: 446 times

Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

[quote=danchase45 post_id=1126441]This is up to Carr and his agent. I am sure they kind of know what both his options are. The Raiders are pushing for a trade because that is in their own best interest. The Raiders have no power here and by David Carr's childish interview this is apparent it could get ugly if the Raiders push this further. Also with Carr's two best buddies Adams and Crosby on the team, I doubt the Raiders want this to even deal with this situation anymore. IMO it just makes sense for both parties for him to be released.[/quote]of course it is up to Carr and his team, I never suggested otherwise. I know he has the no trade. But all reports indicate that Carr will waive his no trade giving him and his team the option of seeking a trade partner or allowing the Raiders to do so. You only allow that to happen if you understand the uncertain nature of what to expect in free agency. Oh and Adams and Crosby are nonfactors. They might as well not exist for discussion purposes. Adams has indicated he came here to play with his college teammate but he is here now to play for the Raiders. Crosby has been largely silent on this.

It is really quite largely in everyone's best interest to get a deal done. The Raiders get compensation, the Carr team gets a new team under his current deal and a new team gets a shiny new toy they do not have to compete with in the market.

Of course this is all my opinion but it has some basis in strong indications of what is going on behind the scenes right now.
User avatar
Trainnvain
Posts: 1,435
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
Has given High Fives: 247 times
Received High Fives: 174 times

Unread post by Trainnvain »

[quote=danchase45 post_id=1126441]This is up to Carr and his agent. I am sure they kind of know what both his options are. The Raiders are pushing for a trade because that is in their own best interest. The Raiders have no power here and by David Carr's childish interview this is apparent it could get ugly if the Raiders push this further. Also with Carr's two best buddies Adams and Crosby on the team, I doubt the Raiders want this to even deal with this situation anymore. IMO it just makes sense for both parties for him to be released.[/quote]If the Raiders were worried about disruption to the team they wouldn't have benched him with two games left in the season plus I am sure they have kept Adams and maybe even Crosby in the loop. I am certain the Raiders are not concerned about any blowback and they absolutely have an interest in trading him. It really makes no sense for them to just give up and release him; if that was the case, why not just release him now?
User avatar
352Raider
Posts: 15,494
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 2:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 387 times
Received High Fives: 333 times

Unread post by 352Raider »

[quote=danchase45 post_id=1126450]So if no draft picks are involved he will be released. Thank you for agreeing with me. :thumbsup:[/quote]Haha you’re a funny guy…I certainly don’t agree he’s going to get signed for anything close to what your posting.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,042
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2054 times
Received High Fives: 2762 times

Unread post by chucker »

[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1126453]If the Raiders were worried about disruption to the team they wouldn't have benched him with two games left in the season plus I am sure they have kept Adams and maybe even Crosby in the loop. I am certain the Raiders are not concerned about any blowback and they absolutely have an interest in trading him. It really makes no sense for them to just give up and release him; if that was the case, why not just release him now?[/quote]I agree. Except for the last part- by rule no player can be released until after the SB.
User avatar
danchase45
Posts: 881
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:24 pm

Unread post by danchase45 »

Releasing Carr right now would be very strange if they did it and I think would be an unwritten rule with owners. Carr would be immediately a free agent and could sign with a playoff team. Don't know the rules with it.
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,144
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 987 times
Received High Fives: 605 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1126453]If the Raiders were worried about disruption to the team they wouldn't have benched him with two games left in the season plus I am sure they have kept Adams and maybe even Crosby in the loop. I am certain the Raiders are not concerned about any blowback and they absolutely have an interest in trading him. It really makes no sense for them to just give up and release him; if that was the case, why not just release him now?[/quote]Rosters are frozen until after the season
User avatar
danchase45
Posts: 881
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 3:24 pm

Unread post by danchase45 »

[quote=FLORIDARAYDAH post_id=1126464]Rosters are frozen until after the season[/quote]What I thought. I think playoff teams can sign a few unrestricted free agents during the playoffs. We will know a few days after the playoffs when Carr is released. :smirk:
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

in this case while rosters are frozen, Carr has been designated for release pending a trade deal in lieu of release. Writing is not written on the wall, it is chiseled. He gets traded or released.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,166
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 285 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

Tick... tick... tick...

Almost there! :party:

https://www.tickcounter.com/countdown/3 ... ntdown-cut
User avatar
Ordos
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 12 times
Received High Fives: 8 times

Unread post by Ordos »

[quote=danchase45 post_id=1126416]With the need at QB right now, he would 100% get a 3 year $90 to $100 million deal fully guaranteed.[/quote]This is not basketball or baseball.

$90-100mm fully guaranteed for Carr would be insane
User avatar
Trainnvain
Posts: 1,435
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
Has given High Fives: 247 times
Received High Fives: 174 times

Unread post by Trainnvain »

[quote=chucker post_id=1126460]I agree. Except for the last part- by rule no player can be released until after the SB.[/quote]I stand corrected on that last part, I forgot rosters get frozen.
User avatar
srv5490
Posts: 3,471
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 pm
Location: Returning Videotapes
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 172 times

Unread post by srv5490 »

[quote=Ivanavich post_id=1126325]If Carr takes the "high road" then he forces the Raiders to cut him.

If he doesn't retire, I hope he does "take the high road."[/quote]So, you are hoping that the Raiders get nothing for him?
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,648
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 669 times
Received High Fives: 362 times

Unread post by rich72 »

[quote=chucker post_id=1126284]https://twitter.com/MoeMoton/status/161 ... 09986?s=20[/quote] Thats great news if true.
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,648
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 669 times
Received High Fives: 362 times

Unread post by rich72 »

Is there an easy out on his contract for the next team to dump him after 1 year?
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,166
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 285 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

[quote=chucker post_id=1126284]https://twitter.com/MoeMoton/status/161 ... 09986?s=20[/quote]2 First, 2 Seconds and a third.

:handshake:
Post Reply