Fernando Mendoza Welcome To Las Vegas

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,843
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 171 times
Received High Fives: 407 times

Dante Moore or Fernando Mendoza

Post by Sold My Soul »

Call your shot....or add your own.

Dante Moore:

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Dante-Moore-QB-UCLA

Fernando Mendoza:

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Fer ... California

May the football godz look kindly down upon the feeble and inept.

:praying:
These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post (total 2):
Dank Sinatra, DanKD
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,669
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1243 times
Received High Fives: 2964 times

Post by Attyla »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:03 am Does anyone know if you can trade a pick to a team with a condition on how they use it? Can part of the deal be that they can’t select a certain player with it?
I don't believe you can make a binding deal in that regard. Teams are going to lie, we all know that. Gaining an advantage is part of the deal. Trading up or down is just poker chips, how you play those chips is your choice.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Jeevo
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,168
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 1006 times
Received High Fives: 617 times

Post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

Jeevo wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:03 am Does anyone know if you can trade a pick to a team with a condition on how they use it? Can part of the deal be that they can’t select a certain player with it?
I don't know if they can make it official but Im sure they come to agreements. We will move back one spot if you don't take X player
These users gave a High Five to the author FLORIDARAYDAH for the post (total 2):
Jeevo, Rabidraider
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,463
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 883 times

Post by LayneStaley »

I feel like most of the time the teams just select the players then trade them with other compensation afterwords.
User avatar
BlackShield
Posts: 2,230
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 36 times
Received High Fives: 39 times

Post by BlackShield »

really like that moore is going up against a ferocious texas tech defense today. they are swarming and coming from all angles. a great test for him.

we shall see what is up with fernando shortly. steady light rain here in los angeles. should taper off by kickoff.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,746
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 230 times
Received High Fives: 512 times

Post by Cruisin with Tooz »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:16 am I don't know if they can make it official but Im sure they come to agreements. We will move back one spot if you don't take X player
Why would the team trading up 1 spot make that trade? If team A wants player A and Team B wants player B, why would they trade up one spot to still get Player B? The trade up has to be at least 2 spots.
User avatar
NoClapsPlease
Posts: 9,470
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
Has given High Fives: 24 times
Received High Fives: 147 times

Post by NoClapsPlease »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:06 am You act like anyone takes your comments seriously. You literally brought up three QBs that went to the Super Bowl in your Mendoza comparison and still have your doubts.
I hate engaging you because the discussion is always shallow and unfulfilling.

Since its a new year, let’s give you a try again:


Where would Goff or purdy be without literally the best coaches the league has seen in the past 25 years?

What’s your confidence level that a QB will succeed here like the two mentioned above?

And just for reference, I’m not in love with any of the QBs in this draft - I want the line and the WR position addressed first and wait until 2027 for the QB, so that we aren’t putting him in position to fail.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoClapsPlease for the post:
Lobo
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,331
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 296 times
Received High Fives: 831 times

Post by Raidernation1979 »

Terrible miss by Moore on the deep ball. Luckily for Oregon TT has a terrible offense
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,473
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 879 times
Received High Fives: 1742 times

Post by Xramfan »

Mendoza for me
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,339
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 2133 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 11:14 am I hate engaging you because the discussion is always shallow and unfulfilling.

Since its a new year, let’s give you a try again:


Where would Goff or purdy be without literally the best coaches the league has seen in the past 25 years?

What’s your confidence level that a QB will succeed here like the two mentioned above?

And just for reference, I’m not in love with any of the QBs in this draft - I want the line and the WR position addressed first and wait until 2027 for the QB, so that we aren’t putting him in position to fail.
Aren't you cute. How's this for shallow...

Jared Goff is doing damn well under a guy who I think is an awful head coach in Dan Campbell, at least from an X&O standpoint. And funny how you left Matt Ryan out of your response. Why don't you take a look at who his head coaches were and get back to me. Yes, I agree that Shanahan makes Purdy look good but I haven't seen one comp of Purdy for Mendoza.

You asked about my confidence level that a QB will succeed here but that's not something you, I or anyone can answer at the moment since none of these coaches will be here. Regardless, it does not mean that you don't address the most important position in all of sports when the opportunity is staring you right in the face.

And funny you want the O line and WR position addressed before taking a QB but you base your Mendoza argument on head coaches. Which is it? Not sure if you are aware of this but you can address QB, WR and O line at the same time with a competent staff.

Hope that was fulfilling enough for you.
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 160 times
Received High Fives: 771 times
Contact:

Post by Corleone »

Xramfan wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 11:28 amMendoza for me
You mean, you don't want the shorter, skinnier, slower, dink n dunk merchant in Moore?
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,669
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1243 times
Received High Fives: 2964 times

Post by Attyla »

I don't normally put up highlight reels but here you go. Watch how he steps into his throws. Watch his play action passes. Watch where he can cut and run when the play breaks down. Watch his touch on the post routes. Watch his twitch. Watch his lower body as he drives. Watch his ability to go through his progressions. These are not things you get from rookies these days. You get RPO athletes. This is a QB has no fear because he is big, already big. Like Ben Rothlesburger big. And his build is almost Big Ben right now. My one complaint is he plays out of the gun too much.


While Rothlesburger had a better deep ball, we have a guy you can make some serious comparisons to. Watch when he runs, he is faster than Ben was, but he can take a hit like Ben and keep going.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,867
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 419 times
Received High Fives: 801 times

Post by Jeevo »

Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 11:12 am Why would the team trading up 1 spot make that trade? If team A wants player A and Team B wants player B, why would they trade up one spot to still get Player B? The trade up has to be at least 2 spots.
To stop someone else from making the deal. I think there was a 1 spot trade up within the last couple of drafts.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
NoClapsPlease
Posts: 9,470
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
Has given High Fives: 24 times
Received High Fives: 147 times

Post by NoClapsPlease »

BoKnows81 wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 11:29 am Aren't you cute. How's this for shallow...

Jared Goff is doing damn well under a guy who I think is an awful head coach in Dan Campbell, at least from an X&O standpoint. And funny how you left Matt Ryan out of your response. Why don't you take a look at who his head coaches were and get back to me. Yes, I agree that Shanahan makes Purdy look good but I haven't seen one comp of Purdy for Mendoza.

You asked about my confidence level that a QB will succeed here but that's not something you, I or anyone can answer at the moment since none of these coaches will be here. Regardless, it does not mean that you don't address the most important position in all of sports when the opportunity is staring you right in the face.

And funny you want the O line and WR position addressed before taking a QB but you base your Mendoza argument on head coaches. Which is it? Not sure if you are aware of this but you can address QB, WR and O line at the same time with a competent staff.

Hope that was fulfilling enough for you.
Interesting.

- I left Matt Ryan out because I said Mendoza I something like a poor man’s Matt Ryan, acknowledging Matt Ryan’s excellence

- 2 things can be right at once. Does our team not need a better coach, improved oline play, and help at the WR position?

- 3 Mendoza isn’t going to fix the problems above alone

- 4 look at how the bears and Texans changed their franchises after hauling picks.

It’s a legitimate option especially if you’re not entirely in love with a QB prospect.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,669
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1243 times
Received High Fives: 2964 times

Post by Attyla »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 12:03 pm Interesting.

- I left Matt Ryan out because I said Mendoza I something like a poor man’s Matt Ryan, acknowledging Matt Ryan’s excellence

- 2 things can be right at once. Does our team not need a better coach, improved oline play, and help at the WR position?

- 3 Mendoza isn’t going to fix the problems above alone

- 4 look at how the bears and Texans changed their franchises after hauling picks.

It’s a legitimate option especially if you’re not entirely in love with a QB prospect.
I want to jump in on this for one thing. Nobody is saying the QB alone is going to fix any of our other issues. People are saying you have to take a shot if you can to fix the most important position on the field. The other issues can be fixed while you fix that. For over a month now I have been talking about this guy. He is a smart player, but he is also just flat out smart. He is better than Ward coming out, he is better than a number of guys taken first overall recently.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Marzan
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,867
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 419 times
Received High Fives: 801 times

Post by Jeevo »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Thu Jan 01, 2026 12:03 pm It’s a legitimate option especially if you’re not entirely in love with a QB prospect.
Yes, it is a legitimate option if Brady’s choice of QB is neither Mendoza nor Moore. Don’t know enough about any of them to comment on how likely it is, but with all the chatter it seems pretty unlikely.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
Attyla
Post Reply