No Nevada state income tax and and FA signings

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Rdrfan1964
Posts: 74
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2025 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 37 times

No Nevada state income tax and and FA signings

Unread post by Rdrfan1964 »

How much did it help or did it?
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,048
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 735 times
Received High Fives: 1158 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

I think it's a big factor. The state of Washington just enacted a "millionaires tax." Seattle's GM John Schneider recently commented on its potential impact on free agency.

https://seattlered.com/taxes/seahawks-w ... ax/4117196
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Toast wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 7:29 pm I think it's a big factor. The state of Washington just enacted a "millionaires tax." Seattle's GM John Schneider recently commented on its potential impact on free agency.

https://seattlered.com/taxes/seahawks-w ... ax/4117196
Bad move. A million ain’t all that much these days. Now a “Billionaire Tax”, all for it.
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,715
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1027 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

I think it's a bit overrated. Several other states have it so it's not unique to Nevada. Is it a factor? Sure, but I don't think it's the first thing any player thinks of
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
chucker
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,357
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 839 times
Received High Fives: 1672 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

So who gets taxed when you run out of millionaires and billionaires?
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 12):
raider_kin, Owsley Stanley, Reno Hightower, Sir Raider Duck, OMS, Dr Death, Raiders Baby, Willmark, Steve007, rich72, DrDUne and 2 more users
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2712 times
Received High Fives: 1171 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 7:52 pm So who gets taxed when you run out of millionaires and billionaires?
Aside from them fleeing the state as they are doing in Cali
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 7:52 pm So who gets taxed when you run out of millionaires and billionaires?
You don't because you are still a millionaire and billionaire after the tax.
And don't worry everyone else is still being taxed, there isn't no running out of.
I hope you are a millionaire + Xramfan, always vote for your own interests.

On FA:
I don't think it effects it much. Yeah perhaps in some cases if two offers are on the table and to that player it's the deciding factor. I feel that is pretty rare, very low %, but don't take my feelings on it.

The proof I use... All teams sign free agents each year. States that tax still get players, states that tax also win SB's. So aren't those easy bottom lines to see vs opinion, no?

On Washington state tax, after a little reading. There is no state income tax currently. After this there will be for anyone making over 1 million. Any income under that isn't taxed, just anything above. So Washington becomes a state that now will have an income tax for income only over 1 million. So it's still less then a state with a general income tax. There are only 8 states with no income tax AND only 3 with NFL teams.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post (total 2):
dred, Marzan
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,357
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 839 times
Received High Fives: 1672 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:00 pm You don't because you are still a millionaire and billionaire after the tax.
And don't worry everyone else is still being taxed, there isn't no running out of.
I hope you are a millionaire + Xramfan, always vote for your own interests.

On FA:
I don't think it effects it much. Yeah perhaps in some cases if two offers are on the table and to that player it's the deciding factor. I feel that is pretty rare, very low %, but don't take my feelings on it.

The proof I use... All teams sign free agents each year. States that tax still get players, states that tax also win SB's. So aren't those easy bottom lines to see vs opinion, no?
Oh no…..those evil evil millionaires
LMAO
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:02 pm Oh no…..those evil evil millionaires
LMAO
Who says they're evil? That's what you must think by bringing it up.

So I added the WA tax to the end, please read it and only 3 NFL states are now state income tax free.
So a small percentage of players get this savings.

So are you voting for your interests or others?
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,357
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 839 times
Received High Fives: 1672 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:06 pm Who says they're evil? That's what you must think by bringing it up.

So I added the WA tax to the end, please read it and only 3 NFL states are now income state free. So a small percentage of players get this savings.

So are you voting for your interests or others?
Not sure what you are asking regarding what I vote for. I suspect like most others I vote for what’s best for the Country collectively but that is of course very subjective.

I’m more or less a Laffer curve guy when it comes to taxation.
When taxes get too high, wealthy individuals often change how they report income, utilize loopholes, or shift investments into tax-exempt assets, meaning the expected revenue never actually shows up.
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, Steve007
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

I want a 20% Trillionaire Tax direct deposited into my account payable monthly. Thanks. :money:
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
Xramfan
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:12 pm Not sure what you are asking regarding what I vote for. I suspect like most others I vote for what’s best for the Country collectively but that is of course very subjective.

I’m more or less a Laffer curve guy when it comes to taxation.
When taxes get too high, wealthy individuals often change how they report income, utilize loopholes, or shift investments into tax-exempt assets, meaning the expected revenue never actually shows up.
On your voting, I hope you vote for your own interests that's all, nothing more.

But i think some of the things I added are good info to know:
WA was a state with no income tax, one of 8.
This isn't an all encompassing states tax, just income above a million, that's still less than states that tax everyone.
That leaves 7 states with no income tax and only 3 of those states have NFL teams, so very few players overall get this savings.

On when taxes get too high loopholes are looked for, I agree loopholes are always being studied. What's too high? WA still looks cheaper than most here, however someone can think that is too high. Is 1% or 2% considered not that high that I'm not looking for a loophole or cheat? I don't know.

To the article, "can we compete in WA?, woes me!", well almost all other teams have had a state tax and they compete. I don't think we've ever heard of a team stating "we can't compete because of taxes and because of this those FL, TX and TN teams just keep winning rings".
User avatar
Sir Raider Duck, OMS
The AssassinFernandoJeanty
Posts: 10,542
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: The Principality of Sealand
Has given High Fives: 315 times
Received High Fives: 280 times

Unread post by Sir Raider Duck, OMS »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:21 pm On your voting, I hope you vote for your own interests that's all, nothing more.
What makes you think he wouldn't be?
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 482 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 9:20 pm What makes you think he wouldn't be?
He seems somewhat worried about millionaires and billionaires taxes, if he's one that's cool.

If not, they will always vote in their best interest, we should study that phenomenon for personal use.
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,048
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 735 times
Received High Fives: 1158 times

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Mar 15, 2026 8:00 pm You don't because you are still a millionaire and billionaire after the tax.
And don't worry everyone else is still being taxed, there isn't no running out of.
I hope you are a millionaire + Xramfan, always vote for your own interests.

On FA:
I don't think it effects it much. Yeah perhaps in some cases if two offers are on the table and to that player it's the deciding factor. I feel that is pretty rare, very low %, but don't take my feelings on it.

The proof I use... All teams sign free agents each year. States that tax still get players, states that tax also win SB's. So aren't those easy bottom lines to see vs opinion, no?

On Washington state tax, after a little reading. There is no state income tax currently. After this there will be for anyone making over 1 million. Any income under that isn't taxed, just anything above. So Washington becomes a state that now will have an income tax for income only over 1 million. So it's still less then a state with a general income tax. There are only 8 states with no income tax AND only 3 with NFL teams.
It's a bit more complicated than that. Politics aside there are reasons why Jeff Bezos, Starbucks, Boeing and a multitude of corporations are leaving or are planning on leaving. In terms of revenue some of these players command earnings that exceed some corporations. A NFL franchise is a billion dollar operation. This will continue to be a factor players and agents consider.

It's a factor, no one said it's necessarily a deal breaker. GM's and player agents are masters at fiscal creativity.
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post:
Viper
Post Reply