The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
- DeathStar24
- Posts: 1,081
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
- Location: PA
- Has given High Fives: 52 times
- Received High Fives: 185 times
For me it's as simple as if you can't score, you can't win. Not to mention the defense blows.
- heavyD
- Posts: 8,671
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
- Has given High Fives: 177 times
- Received High Fives: 465 times
I'm a little worried about the Chiefs game now. The ultimate troll job would be for the Chiefs to no-show to keep the Raiders from landing the first overall pick. Minshew in brief action yesterday already proved that last season in Vegas wasn't a fluke. He's terrible.
- Reno Hightower
- Posts: 3,048
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
- Has given High Fives: 735 times
- Received High Fives: 1157 times
Diego Pavia did himself no favors this weekend. I think Fernando should be the guy but that being said, as I asked in another thread. Why would Mendoza want to come to the Raiders? It's not out of the question for a draft pick to force a team to deal him or not draft him.
I don't believe it's a stretch to say that the Raiders, as they are, are amongst the worst run organizations in the history of professional sports.
If I am a father would I wan't my son to play QB for the Raiders?
I don't believe it's a stretch to say that the Raiders, as they are, are amongst the worst run organizations in the history of professional sports.
If I am a father would I wan't my son to play QB for the Raiders?
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
That scratches he very surface yes, but whats your next move?DeathStar24 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 8:25 am For me it's as simple as if you can't score, you can't win. Not to mention the defense blows.
They have to considering what they have so they can identify what they need.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
if you are the top pick in the draft, you are more than likely going to a bad team. That is how it goes. And yet, every year a QB goes to a bad team and sometimes they make them better and sometimes they don't.Toast wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 9:09 am Diego Pavia did himself no favors this weekend. I think Fernando should be the guy but that being said, as I asked in another thread. Why would Mendoza want to come to the Raiders? It's not out of the question for a draft pick to force a team to deal him or not draft him.
I don't believe it's a stretch to say that the Raiders, as they are, are amongst the worst run organizations in the history of professional sports.
If I am a father would I wan't my son to play QB for the Raiders?
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 4):
- Dr Death, chucker, tatalalicious, Reno Hightower
- DeathStar24
- Posts: 1,081
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
- Location: PA
- Has given High Fives: 52 times
- Received High Fives: 185 times
They need everything but a RB and a TEKillerRaider30 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 9:21 am That scratches he very surface yes, but whats your next move?
They have to considering what they have so they can identify what they need.
- These users gave a High Five to the author DeathStar24 for the post:
- Attyla
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,622
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 40 times
- Received High Fives: 1352 times
Exactly. I mean you want him to force his way to the Jets? Browns? Those franchises are as bad as we are (and id argue NYJ is a much worse place for a qb to go, at least Carr got 9 years of money from us, hed have been kicked out crying of new york much sooner).Attyla wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 9:29 am if you are the top pick in the draft, you are more than likely going to a bad team. That is how it goes. And yet, every year a QB goes to a bad team and sometimes they make them better and sometimes they don't.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1231 times
I wouldn't mind drafting Mendoza AND Pavia. Drafting 2 QBs would give us a better chance of finding "our guy" as opposed to only drafting 1 QB.Toast wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 9:09 am Diego Pavia did himself no favors this weekend. I think Fernando should be the guy but that being said, as I asked in another thread. Why would Mendoza want to come to the Raiders? It's not out of the question for a draft pick to force a team to deal him or not draft him.
I don't believe it's a stretch to say that the Raiders, as they are, are amongst the worst run organizations in the history of professional sports.
If I am a father would I wan't my son to play QB for the Raiders?
Draft 2 QBs, trade Maxx in return for draft pick/s and then use the draft and cap space to address the OL and DL.
If we can improve both the OL and DL, that would make the jobs of our QB's, RBs, and DBs much easier.
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
Ill add Kolton and 2 recievers with great hands in Bech and Mayer plus a decent no. 2 in Tucker.
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
I wouldn't trade Maxx. He has 5 or 6 years left in his prime.
A bird in the hand is worth more than 2 in the draft.
A bird in the hand is worth more than 2 in the draft.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1231 times
Probably more like 3 or 4 years...and this franchise is 2-3-4 years away from realistically turning things around. So as things are now, the Raiders are so bad that Crosby's best years are being wasted.KillerRaider30 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 10:40 am I wouldn't trade Maxx. He has 5 or 6 years left in his prime.
A bird in the hand is worth more than 2 in the draft.
And Mad Maxx's value will never be more than it is right now and the longer we wait the lesser he would bring via a trade.
There's also a saying that goes something like, "It's better to move a player 1-2 years too early than it is to move a player 1-2 years too late".
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2982 times
Pavia is trying to return to Vandy, working with NCAA on it right now.raidersince63 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 10:20 am I wouldn't mind drafting Mendoza AND Pavia. Drafting 2 QBs would give us a better chance of finding "our guy" as opposed to only drafting 1 QB.
Draft 2 QBs, trade Maxx in return for draft pick/s and then use the draft and cap space to address the OL and DL.
If we can improve both the OL and DL, that would make the jobs of our QB's, RBs, and DBs much easier.
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,198
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 46 times
- Received High Fives: 445 times
Pavia is nothing more than a taysom hill in the NFL. And that's best case scenario for him
- These users gave a High Five to the author vtraider for the post (total 2):
- Attyla, mranquales
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 624 times
- Received High Fives: 556 times
We said the same with Mack and look how that ended.raidersince63 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 10:51 am Probably more like 3 or 4 years...and this franchise is 2-3-4 years away from realistically turning things around. So as things are now, the Raiders are so bad that Crosby's best years are being wasted.
And Mad Maxx's value will never be more than it is right now and the longer we wait the lesser he would bring via a trade.
There's also a saying that goes something like, "It's better to move a player 1-2 years too early than it is to move a player 1-2 years too late".
Maxx is the standard, a powerful face of the franchise. They cant trade him.
- These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post:
- R8rBri
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1231 times
Don't see how the 2 parallel and currently, Maxx is "the face" of a shitty team with no compass...Mack was 3 years younger and played a completely different position and played for a completely different regime. And the Raiders team he played for at the time wasn't in complete disarray as the current Raiders team is.KillerRaider30 wrote: Mon Dec 15, 2025 11:02 am We said the same with Mack and look how that ended.
Maxx is the standard, a powerful face of the franchise. They cant trade him.
I don't see a rational reason for wasting the cap hit and talent of Crosby on a team in the condition the Raiders are. The money and draft picks can be used elsewhere.