The O'Connell thread - love him or hate him or indifferent, put it in here

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,588
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 556 times

The O'Connell thread - love him or hate him or indifferent, put it in here

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Looks ripped and ready!

Aidan walking into the facility yesterday
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Hellbound wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 9:03 am I don't think he's as horrible as others, I do however think his production could be closely matched by an udfa. The dude has a 20/17 td to turnover ratio if you include his fumbles and has taken 35 sacks in 21 games and can't move. Just glancing at stats, Jake Browning and Tyler Huntley have similar career stats
He is really not worth this thread, he is actually getting more attention than our penciled in starter. I think we need a thread to discuss our backup punter. Oh wait.
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

https://www.si.com/nfl/2025-ranking-nfl ... arterbacks

Just who do you guys think are the backups for other teams?
These users gave a High Five to the author Raider_Dave for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

^^^

Not many, including myself, would be able to name the QB2 for other teams, and fewer still could name their QB3.

Yeah, 1 or 2 will say they can, but that's to be expected.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 919 times
Received High Fives: 2146 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Maybe this thread should be locked since there are clearly family members of AO12 on here. Specifically, a proud momma who always has little Aidy's back. :popcorn:
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,919
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1514 times
Received High Fives: 1554 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 11:03 am ^^^

Not many, including myself, would be able to name the QB2 for other teams, and fewer still could name their QB3.

Yeah, 1 or 2 will say they can, but that's to be expected.
This is all I could find…

https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/17 ... nd-backups

Edit: Just tried it. Good Lord I hate tests. Hahahha. Really important note, you only need to type in the last name.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,359
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 839 times
Received High Fives: 1675 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

It’s interesting some keep posting in Carr and Aiden threads about people posting in Carr and Aiden threads lol

;)
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 2):
raidersince63, raiderboyron
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,715
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1027 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

I miss Bruce Gradkowski & Charlie Frye
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,536
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 223 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 8:33 pm Day 3 to UDFA.

Here’s a few guys that may fit Kubiak’s scheme.

4-5 range which I don’t think is happening.
Drew Allar Penn State 6’5”
Cade Klubnik Clemson 6’2”

6-7 range. Mmmmmaybe.
Athan Kaliakmanis Rutgers 6’2”

UDFA range. Makes the most sense if it were to happen.
Mark Gronowski South Dakota State 6’2”
Luke Altmyer Illinois 6’2”

Obviously nothing set in stone. FO may be fine with AOC. Just like they might be fine with the WR room and our OL guys drafted last year. No way of knowing until the draft.
I'd love to get Allar as a late round pick, but I suspect some team is going to take him much higher than expected based on his physical skills.
These users gave a High Five to the author Raider_Dave for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
TrueFan420
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:19 pm
Has given High Fives: 10 times
Received High Fives: 44 times

Unread post by TrueFan420 »

Raider_Dave wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 11:51 am I'd love to get Allar as a late round pick, but I suspect some team is going to take him much higher than expected based on his physical skills.
Yeah I could easily see someone gambling on his profile in early to mid 3rd
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 11:36 am It’s interesting some keep posting in Carr and Aiden threads about people posting in Carr and Aiden threads lol

;)
Oh yea, I do not understand the appeal of the guy. He has gotten a lot of milage for a limited amount of talent. I am not opposed to the guy as a backup in years past because he was a system match. He just is not now. He cannot RPO which I hope we do not use much, and he cannot play action and he is not mobile enough for the new regime. So why keep a guy who cannot run the system we are moving toward? And it is not about the money either
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Xramfan wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 11:36 am It’s interesting some keep posting in Carr and Aiden threads about people posting in Carr and Aiden threads lol

;)
Surprised?...lol. People complain about the thread having unjustified legs, yet they continue to post in it.

And "the system"?...like it's some kind of sacred manuscript. 95% of the roster doesn't know the system yet either and the system won't do a 3rd string much good if he's called upon to the next level and neither would a supposed upgraded possible replacement for AOC.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 12:45 pm Surprised?...lol. People complain about the thread having unjustified legs, yet they continue to post in it.

And "the system"?...like it's some kind of sacred manuscript. 95% of the roster don't know the system yet and the system won't do a 3rd string much good if he's called upon to the next level.
OK, but why keep a guy who is not a fit just to keep a guy? The third string QB is easy to find who is closer to a system fit during the preseason cuts and not only a system fit but a bit cheaper. I don't care really about the money but keeping this guy knowing he does not fit just makes little sense. It is about building a roster that makes sense. It has not been nor should it ever be about keeping a round peg on a square peg board. Keep him for now, trot him out there to take meaningless second half snaps until the right guy drops, and snatch him up. There is zero reason to keep him one minute longer if that guy drops and there will be more than a few because teams will be carrying 4 or more QBs on the roster during preseason but nobody w8ill be keeping more than 3 on their active roster at the end of preseason. This is a no brainer thing.
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Again, the system is unknown to virtually to everyone at this point... they'll have to learn it like everyone else.

So why can a QB because he has yet to be connect with his 4th incoming coach in his soon to be 4th season?

Kubiak's system is mostly based on zone blocking and the running game being successful and if any team can achieve that they will likely be more successful with the passing game, neither of which the Raiders have had in recent years. If the Raiders rebuild the line the right way QBS #1, #2 and #3 will all have a better chance to shine if/when called upon.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
TrueFan420
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 11:32 am This is all I could find…

https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/17 ... nd-backups

Edit: Just tried it. Good Lord I hate tests. Hahahha. Really important note, you only need to type in the last name.
Very few if any would pass that test.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2982 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 1:14 pm Again, the system is unknown to virtually to everyone at this point... they'll have to learn it like everyone else.

Kubiak's system is mostly based on zone blocking and the running game being successful and if any team can achieve that they will likely be more successful with the running game neither of which the Raiders have not had in recent years. If the Raiders rebuild the line the right way QBS #1, #2 and #3 will all have a better chance to shine if/when called upon.
No, that is not the case. We would not have brought in Cousins if they did not know what the system is going to be. They brought in a guy with a specific skill set to help train Mendoza in the system. I don't like Cousins but I get why they brought him in. And he and O'Connell are polar opposites. So again, it bears the question, why keep a guy one moment more than needed that does not fit? You seem to think we are going to get away from what Kubiak has been known for his entire career. You build the team with guys who fit. You do not keep guys who do not. It is absolutely the wrong thing to do to just keep a guy for some mysterious reason that revolves around some notion of continuity. Change things you can change that makes sense and replacing a QB3 is about the easiest thing to do. Only finding a kicker is easier, or the ball boy.
Post Reply