Fernando Mendoza Welcome To Las Vegas
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,838
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 170 times
- Received High Fives: 412 times
Dante Moore or Fernando Mendoza
Call your shot....or add your own.
Dante Moore:
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Dante-Moore-QB-UCLA
Fernando Mendoza:
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Fer ... California
May the football godz look kindly down upon the feeble and inept.

Dante Moore:
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Dante-Moore-QB-UCLA
Fernando Mendoza:
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Fer ... California
May the football godz look kindly down upon the feeble and inept.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post (total 2):
- Dank Sinatra, DanKD
I mean if that's your argument then why wouldn't the Jets be fine taking him at two while keeping all those picks to build around him? The jets may have thought about moving up if they were outside of the top 2, but there is no way they are giving up that kind of capital to move up to one.Raider Nation wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 12:12 am Tell me this, would you rather have:
Mendoza (compares to Goff/Matt Ryan)
Or
Moore (compares to CJ Stroud) + 1, 2, or 3 extra first round picks.
The intriguing thing about Moore, is he is only 20, and has potentially more room to grow.
The way I see it, we aren’t going to win the SB next year, so I’m not worried about letting Moore grow for a year.
Now if Mendoza is considered to be the next Brady, then I wouldn’t trade for 5 extra firsts…..
- DeathStar24
- Posts: 1,100
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
- Location: PA
- Has given High Fives: 53 times
- Received High Fives: 186 times
For sure. Mendoza appears to be the bizaro Jamarcus.haji81872 wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 9:31 am Dismissing a person's character is what got us Russell. To win games you need to be a leader, have personal responsibility and integrity. Combine that with immense football skill and you have yourself something.
- Raider_Dave
- Posts: 3,550
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
- Has given High Fives: 5 times
- Received High Fives: 231 times
Pretty tired of all the comps. Everyone is different with so many variables.
Here's a comp for you. Mendoza is a more athletic and smarter version of Tom Brady.
Here's a comp for you. Mendoza is a more athletic and smarter version of Tom Brady.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1235 times
- Received High Fives: 2947 times
I cannot wait for the day when people are comparing a prospect to Mendoza because he is that good.Raider_Dave wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 10:54 am Pretty tired of all the comps. Everyone is different with so many variables.
Here's a comp for you. Mendoza is a more athletic and smarter version of Tom Brady.
-
RickRyb
- Posts: 1,597
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1153 times
- Received High Fives: 442 times
The four layers of making the #1 pick
Layer One - Current film of player's playing history to date
Layer Two - Injury during the CFB Playoffs
Layer Three - Combine results
Layer Four - Personal interview
Layer One - Current film of player's playing history to date
Layer Two - Injury during the CFB Playoffs
Layer Three - Combine results
Layer Four - Personal interview
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,329
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2155 times
Just watched a video from Todd McShay. He said he would take Moore at #1 if he were the Raiders. He said if you're looking to win games in the immediate future, Mendoza is your guy BUT he would put his career and his family's income (his words) that over a 10 year career, Moore is the guy.
Do not shoot the messenger, I do not agree with Todd. He did say he's intrigued to watch Mendoza vs Moore this weekend.
Do not shoot the messenger, I do not agree with Todd. He did say he's intrigued to watch Mendoza vs Moore this weekend.
-
RickRyb
- Posts: 1,597
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1153 times
- Received High Fives: 442 times
I have never been a huge fan of McShay. Poor man Mortenson (RIP)
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,045
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2064 times
- Received High Fives: 2766 times
I listened to his podcast this morning where he mocked Moore to us. I find it interesting to hear the arguments, even though I disagree. It's interesting that he believes that Moore's greater need for development would be a fit for the Raiders who he thinks are better equipped to handle that than the Jets would be.BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:39 am Just watched a video from Todd McShay. He said he would take Moore at #1 if he were the Raiders. He said if you're looking to win games in the immediate future, Mendoza is your guy BUT he would put his career and his family's income (his words) that over a 10 year career, Moore is the guy.
Do not shoot the messenger, I do not agree with Todd. He did say he's intrigued to watch Mendoza vs Moore this weekend.
His discussion of both players actually made me want Mendoza more, even though he mocked Moore #1. It was a bit like he was arguing against his own conclusion.
I'm happy to hear the discussion over the coming months...... I suspect I won't be moved off Mendoza but listening is still invormative.
-
RickRyb
- Posts: 1,597
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1153 times
- Received High Fives: 442 times
It will be interesting watching them play Friday and if the game sways the needle at all.
- DeathStar24
- Posts: 1,100
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:11 pm
- Location: PA
- Has given High Fives: 53 times
- Received High Fives: 186 times
It does coincide with the higher ceiling argument for Moore.BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:39 am Just watched a video from Todd McShay. He said he would take Moore at #1 if he were the Raiders. He said if you're looking to win games in the immediate future, Mendoza is your guy BUT he would put his career and his family's income (his words) that over a 10 year career, Moore is the guy.
Do not shoot the messenger, I do not agree with Todd. He did say he's intrigued to watch Mendoza vs Moore this weekend.
However, of course they're (Raiders) looking to win games in the immediate future. I don't think the Raiders will have the patience to hope Moore turns into what he could be if he doesn't come out and play well right out of the gate.
- These users gave a High Five to the author DeathStar24 for the post:
- BoKnows81
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,329
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 928 times
- Received High Fives: 2155 times
Agreed. This weekend's game will sure be interesting. I highly doubt I'll be moved toward the Moore direction either.chucker wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:46 am I listened to his podcast this morning where he mocked Moore to us. I find it interesting to hear the arguments, even though I disagree. It's interesting that he believes that Moore's greater need for development would be a fit for the Raiders who he thinks are better equipped to handle that than the Jets would be.
His discussion of both players actually made me want Mendoza more, even though he mocked Moore #1. It was a bit like he was arguing against his own conclusion.
I'm happy to hear the discussion over the coming months...... I suspect I won't be moved off Mendoza but listening is still invormative.
-
Raidernation1979
- Posts: 8,316
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
- Has given High Fives: 297 times
- Received High Fives: 827 times
There is something to be said for playing devils advocate to both things you agree with and things you disagree with.chucker wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:46 am I listened to his podcast this morning where he mocked Moore to us. I find it interesting to hear the arguments, even though I disagree. It's interesting that he believes that Moore's greater need for development would be a fit for the Raiders who he thinks are better equipped to handle that than the Jets would be.
His discussion of both players actually made me want Mendoza more, even though he mocked Moore #1. It was a bit like he was arguing against his own conclusion.
I'm happy to hear the discussion over the coming months...... I suspect I won't be moved off Mendoza but listening is still invormative.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
- chucker
-
RickRyb
- Posts: 1,597
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1153 times
- Received High Fives: 442 times
I would imagine the Mendoza camp is stating they're just focused on the CFB playoffs and the Oregon ducks and aren't even thinking about the NFL right now.
-
Raidernation1979
- Posts: 8,316
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
- Has given High Fives: 297 times
- Received High Fives: 827 times
I’ve seen people say multiple times Moore has a higher ceiling. What makes his ceiling higher?DeathStar24 wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 12:00 pm It does coincide with the higher ceiling argument for Moore.
However, of course they're (Raiders) looking to win games in the immediate future. I don't think the Raiders will have the patience to hope Moore turns into what he could be if he doesn't come out and play well right out of the gate.
- NoThanksSir
- Posts: 8,435
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Has given High Fives: 450 times
- Received High Fives: 541 times
He's the worst Oregon QB to come out in awhile. Herbert and Nix were both slept on. Moore is an objectively bad prospect but all of a sudden Oregon's system is reliable, and there's no clear #2 in this class after Mendoza. Moore is a product of the algo, he's a bad prospect.Raidernation1979 wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 12:30 pm I’ve seen people say multiple times Moore has a higher ceiling. What makes his ceiling higher?