Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,321
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 207 times
Received High Fives: 436 times

Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

User avatar
Toons
Posts: 1,508
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 12:38 pm

Unread post by Toons »

[quote=Fade2SilverAndBlack post_id=1012616]I'd like to know how David Carr is even employed by the NFL net. He's Clueless. Darren Carr must get a check from Derek to be a cheerleader....

I turned the game right off after the final score and wasn't paying attention once it got out of hand. What is David Carr talking about? I remember Collinsworth saying he though it would be a good close game...

https://twitter.com/DCarr8/status/14600 ... 67811?s=20[/quote]I believe he was calling out the Raiders and saying how disappointed he was and expected more. Usually I don't like the guy but he was 100% right. National spot light and stunk it up.
User avatar
Jeremyturner1976
Posts: 6,830
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:26 am

Unread post by Jeremyturner1976 »

[quote=tactician post_id=1012520]Carr is better than Dalton, but not by much.[/quote]Dalton: 'His best seasons statistically, though, came in either 2013 or 2016. He threw for 4,293 yards, 33 touchdowns, and 20 interceptions in 2013, and 4,206 yards, 18 touchdowns, and eight interceptions in 2016.'

For a career, Carr has 'safer' numbers for sure. I would say prime Dalton and Prime Carr, is awfully close. Neither one ever rose to the occasion, which to me is the main similarity.

So many 'playoff' chance seasons recently with nothing but mid'round draft picks to show for it.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

We seem to be in a unique situation, a QB who will be in the final year of his contract next year, a new coach looks to be on the horizon as well. We probably get a new GM is my prediction.

So Carr's relative value next year as of right now would rank him as the 15th most expensive QB out there, so cheap to keep. Zero dead money as well. New GM hires his coach, the GM drafts the QB of the future and we let Carr play out his final season. Even if Carr pulls a Favre and decides he is not mentoring his replacement, the QB of the future gets a sideline view of the NFL which will be valuable.

If the QB class does not measure up to the GM's liking, we tag Carr (2023 QB tag is not that expensive if I remember correctly) and do it again. We use 2021-23 to rebuild the rest of the team and make a run in 2024 at the latest. It also gives Carr 2 more years to prove he can get over 2021.

Seems like we are in a win/win situation contract wise.
User avatar
raiders1988xyz

Unread post by raiders1988xyz »

perfect timing to get rid of carr next year or 2

can't wait for a new quarterback that actually want to win at all cost
User avatar
Aqua
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 5:49 pm

Unread post by Aqua »

[quote=Attyla post_id=1012820]

Seems like we are in a win/win situation contract wise.[/quote]I agree , but after every game in which Carr has a respectable performance fans can expect Derek , his brother, his nephews etc... to talk about the next contract.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,040
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2050 times
Received High Fives: 2757 times

Unread post by chucker »

[quote=Aqua post_id=1012824]I agree , but after every game in which Carr has a respectable performance fans can expect Derek , his brother, his nephews etc... to talk about the next contract.[/quote]I don't know what Darren or David say because I don't listen and don't care and it doesn't impact me in any way. It would matter if Derek did what you're saying but he does not - ever. He has only ever mentioned a contract when directly asked the question and the most recent answer pushed the issue and discussion to the offseason at the earliest.

There's no need to create a narrative that doesn't exist.
User avatar
Aqua
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 5:49 pm

Unread post by Aqua »

[quote=chucker post_id=1012825]I don't know what Darren or David say because I don't listen and don't care and it doesn't impact me in any way. It would matter if Derek did what you're saying but he does not - ever. He has only ever mentioned a contract when directly asked the question and the most recent answer pushed the issue and discussion to the offseason at the earliest.

There's no need to create a narrative that doesn't exist.[/quote]Derek's nephews host a weekly podcast where they ask him leading questions about his contract situation. Most recently Derek's commentary is that he "doesn't care if the contract gets done now or after this season". He seems to disrespect the fact that his current contract includes next season.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,040
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2050 times
Received High Fives: 2757 times

Unread post by chucker »

[quote=Aqua post_id=1012829]Derek's nephews host a weekly podcast where they ask him leading questions about his contract situation. Most recently Derek's commentary is that he "doesn't care if the contract gets done now or after this season". He seems to disrespect the fact that his current contract includes next season.[/quote]Haha, you watch that?!?! I think that is classified as a "you" problem. The Raiders don't need to extend him if they don't want to..... and I've had the position all along that they should take it to the franchise tag, or the second franchise tag. How is this even an issue unless you go way out of your way to view a podcast that features a guy you don't like?
User avatar
Aqua
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2021 5:49 pm

Unread post by Aqua »

[quote=chucker post_id=1012832][/quote]Raiders fans know the team does not need to now give Derek a new contract, but Derek and his family don't see it that way. They think Carr is sensational and deserved a new contract yesterday. They will do what they can to make this an issue, try to put pressure on the Raiders etc... Wait for it.
User avatar
raiders1988xyz

Unread post by raiders1988xyz »

do you honestly think the raiders will give carr a new contract if he shit the bed in 2nd half of the season and miss the playoffs

my answer is no
User avatar
tactician
Posts: 2,574
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:42 pm

Unread post by tactician »

If Carr were a free agent would there be a strong market for him? Probably not.
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,428
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 446 times
Received High Fives: 537 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

[quote=Attyla post_id=1012820]We seem to be in a unique situation, a QB who will be in the final year of his contract next year, a new coach looks to be on the horizon as well. We probably get a new GM is my prediction.

So Carr's relative value next year as of right now would rank him as the 15th most expensive QB out there, so cheap to keep. Zero dead money as well. New GM hires his coach, the GM drafts the QB of the future and we let Carr play out his final season. Even if Carr pulls a Favre and decides he is not mentoring his replacement, the QB of the future gets a sideline view of the NFL which will be valuable.

If the QB class does not measure up to the GM's liking, we tag Carr (2023 QB tag is not that expensive if I remember correctly) and do it again. We use 2021-23 to rebuild the rest of the team and make a run in 2024 at the latest. It also gives Carr 2 more years to prove he can get over 2021.

Seems like we are in a win/win situation contract wise.[/quote]I will argue against keeping him. Will we be able to actually draft a decent enough prospect this year? I think the wheels are coming off but I can still see us limp to a 7-8 win record. May not be in a situation to get a solid QB.

On top of that getting rid of Carr would free up close to 20 mill in cap space. At that point if Deshaun Watson is cleared we could make a play for him or Rodgers. But even if we don't go out and trade for a QB, that 20 mill could be put to good use with a bandaid QB + other players.

We will have to take a step back to be in a position to find the next QB in my opinion. Picking in the early teens/top 10 is a must, even if you intend on trading up. Keeping Carr around will only prolong our ability to find his replacement.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1237 times
Received High Fives: 2965 times

Unread post by Attyla »

[quote=tactician post_id=1012838]If Carr were a free agent would there be a strong market for him? Probably not.[/quote]I think there might be a good market for him. And not as a back up either. Jets, Dolphins, Bears, Lions, Steelers, Browns, Texans, Broncos, 49ers, Washington, Philly, Giants, and Saints probably would see him as an upgrade and with starting caliber QBs hard to come by, they might flip the switch. If Rodgers walks as expected, they could be on the list as well.

QB market this off season of starting caliber QB's who are not 1 step from retirement is extremely limited, I could see a lot of interest in Carr, It comes down to if he meant what he said about not wanting to play for another team, which i personally think is bullshit to show loyalty.
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,041
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

I said for the last two draft we needed to draft QB not necessarily to start but to develop also said that if we don’t get the playoffs this year then it has to be done for Carr

https://amp.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/2 ... -midseason

Looking at the possibly QB prospects i wouldn’t say it is a weak class i’d say there is top class talent with big one or two questions to answer about themselves, i like a few of them (Corral, Ridder & Strong) but i guess it is dependant on the type of offence we’re going to run next year.

I think Carr would have a good market aswell as teams will always see the elite performances & ignore the bad thinking it will change. That sort of stuff happens every off season as someone always thinks they can salvage things & get a certain player back to there best
User avatar
raiders1988xyz

Unread post by raiders1988xyz »

[quote=CWood24 post_id=1012844]I said for the last two draft we needed to draft QB not necessarily to start but to develop also said that if we don’t get the playoffs this year then it has to be done for Carr

https://amp.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/2 ... -midseason

Looking at the possibly QB prospects i wouldn’t say it is a weak class i’d say there is top class talent with big one or two questions to answer about themselves, i like a few of them (Ridder, Pickett & Strong) but i guess it is dependant on the type of offence we’re going to run next year.[/quote]can they scramble well unlike carr? we probably have to trade up and draft willis

look at the elite quarterbacks who can scramble

jackson - 639 yards, 2 touchdowns
allen - 322 yards, 3 touchdowns
mahomes - 227 yards, 1 touchdown
murray - 147 yards, 3 touchdowns, was out for a few games

carr - 52 yards, 0 touchdown
Post Reply