Emo Andy Dalton after a trip to Sephora on Groundhog Day (Carr thread)
-
RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 16,345
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 208 times
- Received High Fives: 442 times
-
Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,718
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 441 times
- Received High Fives: 419 times
[quote=signal post_id=1053467]Each day I come on here and not read that Carr has been extended is a good one.
It isn't much but it does allow me to retain the little hope I have for this new regime and its prospects moving forward.
Just saying...[/quote]Signal, I wanted to give you a high five but I don't want to jinx us.
It isn't much but it does allow me to retain the little hope I have for this new regime and its prospects moving forward.
Just saying...[/quote]Signal, I wanted to give you a high five but I don't want to jinx us.
-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,960
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1542 times
- Received High Fives: 1577 times
[quote=signal post_id=1053467]Each day I come on here and not read that Carr has been extended is a good one.
It isn't much but it does allow me to retain the little hope I have for this new regime and its prospects moving forward.
Just saying...[/quote]March 12th, 2022. No new contract.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h4UqMyldS7Q
It isn't much but it does allow me to retain the little hope I have for this new regime and its prospects moving forward.
Just saying...[/quote]March 12th, 2022. No new contract.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h4UqMyldS7Q
-
Robblake
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 6:54 pm
[quote=Attyla post_id=1053803]there have not been a lot of truly great NFL players from Fresno St but there is a handful of them. Henry Ellard stands out in my mind, but ironically two of their QBs have Super Bowl rings. Can the third get one as well?[/quote]Ellard/mankins/Neal/Adams/berrian/ pittman
Not bad for a small school
Not bad for a small school
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1236 times
- Received High Fives: 2950 times
[quote=Robblake post_id=1053956]Ellard/mankins/Neal/Adams/berrian/ pittman
Not bad for a small school[/quote]yea, not a terrible haul to be sure.
Not bad for a small school[/quote]yea, not a terrible haul to be sure.
-
GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,960
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1542 times
- Received High Fives: 1577 times
Sunday, March 13th, 2022. “Spring Forward” and no new contract. Halleleujah!!! 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PqUqTXWnQBw
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PqUqTXWnQBw
-
Raider727
- Posts: 5,832
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
- Location: Somewhere drinking tangy 🍊
- Has given High Fives: 36 times
- Received High Fives: 125 times
[quote=GoodTimeCharlie post_id=1053989]Sunday, March 13th, 2022. “Spring Forward” and no new contract. Halleleujah!!!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PqUqTXWnQBw[/quote]No Carr contract extension vibes!
https://youtu.be/S85ceVI4mfg
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PqUqTXWnQBw[/quote]No Carr contract extension vibes!
https://youtu.be/S85ceVI4mfg
-
Raider727
- Posts: 5,832
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
- Location: Somewhere drinking tangy 🍊
- Has given High Fives: 36 times
- Received High Fives: 125 times
There's rumors a couple of teams are interested in Mariota. Imagine he gets to start elsewhere and plays well. I'm still upset they never let Mariota get more playing time to see what the Raiders had in him.
-
BoJacksonRules
- Posts: 2,690
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
- Has given High Fives: 341 times
- Received High Fives: 160 times
Somehow I missed seeing a member of this board saying that we should sign him for $40m a year.
-
rich72
- Posts: 8,649
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
- Has given High Fives: 664 times
- Received High Fives: 361 times
[quote=BoJacksonRules post_id=1054043]Somehow I missed seeing a member of this board saying that we should sign him for $40m a year.[/quote]Any mention of carr on twitter and you would think he was a 6 time superbowl champ. They would give him 50 million if they could.
-
KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,596
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 625 times
- Received High Fives: 550 times
Is this where the haters congregate on this board?
My Lord.
My Lord.
-
352Raider
- Posts: 15,496
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 2:47 pm
- Has given High Fives: 386 times
- Received High Fives: 332 times
Quarterback ratings
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1236 times
- Received High Fives: 2950 times
[quote=BoJacksonRules post_id=1054043]Somehow I missed seeing a member of this board saying that we should sign him for $40m a year.[/quote]"should" is the wrong word. "Will likely" would be the correct phrasing in my opinion
-
black soul
- Posts: 1,807
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:56 am
[quote=Raider727 post_id=1054041]There's rumors a couple of teams are interested in Mariota. Imagine he gets to start elsewhere and plays well. I'm still upset they never let Mariota get more playing time to see what the Raiders had in him.[/quote]Yea, I think Mariota gets a chance to start this season. A lot of teams need Qb's and not much to go around so I think he'll have his pick from a few teams.
He'd fit well in Seattle as a bridge Qb if they draft a guy like Malik Willis. He'd also help fill seats there because of his fanbase in the NW. Also possibly in Indy if they don't get whoever they have in mind in a trade.
He'd fit well in Seattle as a bridge Qb if they draft a guy like Malik Willis. He'd also help fill seats there because of his fanbase in the NW. Also possibly in Indy if they don't get whoever they have in mind in a trade.
-
Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,706
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 1144 times
- Received High Fives: 581 times
[quote=352Raider post_id=1054155]Quarterback ratings
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/[/quote]Interesting. It seems to be accurate in showing the difference in on the field performance between the QBs in the division. Even taking Wilson's injury to his throwing hand into account last year, he still outscores Carr in a division with the Rams, 9'ers, and Cardinals.
The 9'ers showed you could get pretty far with a good defense, a couple of playmakers on offense, and a quarterback whose primary job is to not f[raiders_icon]ck things up. That's what I'd like to see us do.
How this works: This forecast is based on 50,000 simulations of the season and updates after every game. Our traditional model uses Elo ratings (a measure of strength based on head-to-head results and quality of opponent) to calculate teams’ chances of winning their regular-season games and advancing to and through the playoffs. Our quarterback-adjusted Elo model incorporates news reports to project likely starters for every upcoming game and uses our quarterback Elo ratings to adjust win probabilities for those games. A team’s current quarterback adjustment is based on its likely starter in its next game and how much better or worse that QB is than the team’s top starter. Full methodology »
Game metrics are on a 0-100 scale. Quality is determined by the harmonic mean of the teams’ Elo ratings; importance measures how much the result will alter playoff projections; the overall number is the average of the quality and importance values.
Factoring in Russell Wilson on the Broncos now, Carr is definitely the #4 QB in the division at this point.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... rterbacks/[/quote]Interesting. It seems to be accurate in showing the difference in on the field performance between the QBs in the division. Even taking Wilson's injury to his throwing hand into account last year, he still outscores Carr in a division with the Rams, 9'ers, and Cardinals.
The 9'ers showed you could get pretty far with a good defense, a couple of playmakers on offense, and a quarterback whose primary job is to not f[raiders_icon]ck things up. That's what I'd like to see us do.