NFL Trade Deadline
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,518
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 345 times
- Received High Fives: 870 times
NFL Trade Deadline
Ok maybe this doesn’t need its own thread but the deadline is 5 weeks away. I know the next couple weeks will determine if we are buyers but let’s say we get to 5-2 do we make a move?
I really wish we still had Jakobi here but it sounds like a few guys might be available…
Brian Thomas Jr
Marvin Harrison Jr
Jerry Jeudy
Thoughts?
I really wish we still had Jakobi here but it sounds like a few guys might be available…
Brian Thomas Jr
Marvin Harrison Jr
Jerry Jeudy
Thoughts?
-
Jeevo
- Posts: 14,893
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
- Location: Canada
- Has given High Fives: 423 times
- Received High Fives: 810 times
ESPN - not Barnwell - Vikings A and Raiders B+
Despite posturing that they might hold Cousins, this was always the best move for the Raiders. Had they not dealt Cousins, he likely would have played a couple more games before they turned the keys over to Mendoza. Was keeping that plan worth a third-round pick and $10 million? Surely not.
There's an argument that starting Mendoza's career with games against the Seahawks and Broncos defenses will stunt his development. I don't really buy that, but if the Raiders are concerned they could play Aidan O'Connell for a few weeks and let Mendoza take over after, perhaps following their Week 13 bye. Either way, it made sense for them to get the third-round pick (and save the money).
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,217
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 440 times
- Received High Fives: 306 times
What this fails to mention or intentionally leaves out is we acquired him for nothing and received a 3rd in return.Jeevo wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:28 pm ESPN - not Barnwell - Vikings A and Raiders B+
Despite posturing that they might hold Cousins, this was always the best move for the Raiders. Had they not dealt Cousins, he likely would have played a couple more games before they turned the keys over to Mendoza. Was keeping that plan worth a third-round pick and $10 million? Surely not.
There's an argument that starting Mendoza's career with games against the Seahawks and Broncos defenses will stunt his development. I don't really buy that, but if the Raiders are concerned they could play Aidan O'Connell for a few weeks and let Mendoza take over after, perhaps following their Week 13 bye. Either way, it made sense for them to get the third-round pick (and save the money).
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,400
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 846 times
- Received High Fives: 1102 times
exactly, the raiders got max value (3rd rd pick) for a guy they got for 650k, plus the deal with the vikes clears the raiders of 10 million against the cap next yr too16 to 88 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 2:14 pm What this fails to mention or intentionally leaves out is we acquired him for nothing and received a 3rd in return.
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,217
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 440 times
- Received High Fives: 306 times
As I had written before around here somewhere, I wonder if they are going to trade him, that they may believe or already realize that Maxx might be worth more in the offseason than now? New year, new hope and teams looking for a disruptive DE.
-
raider_kin
- Posts: 4,439
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2705 times
- Received High Fives: 1197 times
Or leakedAttyla wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:13 pm Safe to say we did not. That level of trade would have been announced immediately.