Tank bowl rematch: Jags at Raiders game thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,317
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 207 times
Received High Fives: 436 times

Tank bowl rematch: Jags at Raiders game thread

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

Last year when Jacksonville came to Vegas, it was considered a tank bowl. This year the Raiders are still bad but the Jaguars are 4-3.

At this point is a Raider win really a loss?
These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Goodlukchuck
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:49 am
Received High Fives: 16 times

Unread post by Goodlukchuck »

Good game overall. Took it down to the wire. I think going for 2 at this point was the correct call. No playoffs anyway. Win like men or lose like men. Don't like the result but it was the right thing to do.
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodlukchuck for the post:
XSeahawksFan
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,273
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4330 times
Received High Fives: 1119 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:36 pm There’s only one that looks good right now in Mendoza. I know some like the Oregon guy but he seems like a screen passer.
The QB for the Bearcats is promising. A project for sure... but he has an NFL caliber arm and I'm sure he could be coached.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
XSeahawksFan
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Dr Death wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:44 pm Agree.... but Pete has to stay out of the draft. Let Spytek do his job.
When I say complete tear down PC is first to get kicked to the curb & Geno is second lol
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, raider_kin
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Going for 2 was shockingly the best decision I've seen from Pete all year. It was the right call.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 4):
Dr Death, 352Raider, Oaktown Superman, pfish57
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Hellbound wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:40 pm That fact is getting glossed over. We win if Carlson could do what he gets paid to do. St coach sucks or not, Carlson knows how to kick a fcking ball
Thank God he f[raiders_icon]cked up
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,791
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1090 times
Received High Fives: 1003 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Dr Death wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:46 pm The QB for the Bearcats is promising. A project for sure... but he has an NFL caliber arm and I'm sure he could be coached.
As an organization we don't have the luxury of time to develop a QB. Any QB we draft has to be able to start Day 1.

We built the team the wrong way, i.e trying to do it without a franchise QB. As such the clock is ticking on the contracts of Bowers, Jeanty, etc. A properly run NFL team structures everything around the QB.

We are not a properly run team.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Dr Death
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 4,273
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 4330 times
Received High Fives: 1119 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

Willmark wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:51 pm As an organization we don't have the luxury of time to develop a QB. Any QB we draft has to be able to start Day 1.

We built the team the wrong way, i.e trying to do it without a franchise QB. As such the clock is ticking on the contracts of Bowers, Jeanty, etc. A properly run NFL team structures everything around the QB.

We are not a properly run team.
There is no QB in this next draft that can start day one...IMO.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
Raider_Len
Posts: 2,230
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:46 am
Location: Raiders fan purgatory
Has given High Fives: 19 times
Received High Fives: 77 times

Unread post by Raider_Len »

RaiderandBulldog wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:29 pm Outside of Maxx and Meyers who are we selling?
Anyone else
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Willmark wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:43 pm He looks good, but his starting resume is really thin.
If the powers to be think he will be a top 3 pick which he will be he will say f[raiders_icon]ck you Bama and become eligible for the draft...dude has been in the Bama system since Saban was there...he is Legit!
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,282
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 917 times
Received High Fives: 2144 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Dr Death wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:54 pm There is no QB in this next draft that can start day one...IMO.
I don't care. I'd take my chances on a rookie over having to watch this moron at QB again.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
The Real CK
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,317
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 207 times
Received High Fives: 436 times

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

Raider_Len wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:55 pm Anyone else
Let me put it this way. Who do the Raiders have that other teams would trade picks for?
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,791
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1090 times
Received High Fives: 1003 times

Unread post by Willmark »

pfish57 wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:55 pm If the powers to be think he will be a top 3 pick which he will be he will say fck you Bama and become eligible for the draft...dude has been in the Bama system since Saban was there...he is Legit!
Not saying he isn't skilled. He is.

My concern is is starting resume isn't that extensive. The Parcells methodology isn't as relevant as it was a number of years ago but it does one thing well: weed out one-year wonders. Not saying he is that, but we have to consider that as a possibility.
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,682
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 346 times
Received High Fives: 824 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Willmark wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:51 pm As an organization we don't have the luxury of time to develop a QB. Any QB we draft has to be able to start Day 1.

We built the team the wrong way, i.e trying to do it without a franchise QB. As such the clock is ticking on the contracts of Bowers, Jeanty, etc. A properly run NFL team structures everything around the QB.

We are not a properly run team.
No doubt it is a shit show, we let Good players walk so we can save a few mil and replace them with the likes of Roberts lol yea we have a lot of cap space that is f[raiders_icon]cking doing us no good if we don't use it & it shows, meanwhile most of our D that was good is feasting on other teams!
User avatar
srv5490
Posts: 3,471
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 pm
Location: Returning Videotapes
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 172 times

Unread post by srv5490 »

Dr Death wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:54 pm There is no QB in this next draft that can start day one...IMO.
That depends on the context of the question.

Is there a QB in the draft that could start day one for a legitimate NFL team? - Maybe

Is there a QB in the draft that would be better on day one 2026 than the options we have now? - For sure.

Is there a QB in the draft that could start day one behind this OL? No chance.
These users gave a High Five to the author srv5490 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Willmark
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,791
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1090 times
Received High Fives: 1003 times

Unread post by Willmark »

srv5490 wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 5:03 pm That depends on the context of the question.

Is there a QB in the draft that could start for a legitimate NFL team? - Maybe

Is there a QB in the draft that would be better on day one 2026 than the options we have now? - FOr sure.

Is there a QB in the draft that could start day one behind this OL? No chance.
Agree with all these points except the last. I'm not entirely sure the OL is this bad. IMO it boils down to Geno and scheme and maybe a (bonus 3rd one) Miller being out.
Post Reply