Raiderstation

Who do we want?

Discuss

Trade up for either Pregnon or Dunker please

KillerRaider30 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:47 pm I think Koonce and Tyree are gone next year and this guy needs a year to develop.
A build for the future pick.
An outside linebacker.

Good teams make moves proactively & develop players into starters when they can instead of having to fill holes immediately

I like moves like this cause it makes me feel like the franchise decision makers are thinking about the future instead of just always dealing in the now

Koonce & Snowden are on one year deals. Wilson will be gone this yr or next. Crawford is one of Koonce/Snowden replacement. Might not like the pick but the logic is there

This roster doesn’t have the benefit of praying projects pan out.

And no, this is not “the sky is falling” post. It’s “the team has gone 7-27 the past two seasons and needs a huge influx of starters” post.

Good teams with good rosters should gamble at pick 67. Maybe.

branch,brazzell,sarrat next ???

At this rate we will probably grab a RB with our next pick.

BoJacksonRules wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:50 pm Trade up for either Pregnon or Dunker please

If Pregnon is dropping this much the question has to be why & also if he is worth it

Hellbound wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:51 pm Koonce & Snowden are on one year deals. Wilson will be gone this yr or next. Crawford is one of Koonce/Snowden replacement. Might not like the pick but the logic is there

agree plus crawford is a good pass rusher with bend perfect replacement for koonce

I don't get it. Don't we have enough pass rushers? Why Keyron Crawford?

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:52 pm If Pregnon is dropping this much the question has to be why & also if he is worth it

something is definitely up with pregnon falling this far

anyone wanna take a shot at mccoy now ???

Don't y'all get tired of justifying bad picks? I mean really. It never works out for you guys. This team is bombing Day 2 so far. One more pick to make it right.

DrDUne wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:51 pm This roster doesn’t have the benefit of praying projects pan out.

And no, this is not “the sky is falling” post. It’s “the team has gone 7-27 the past two seasons and needs a huge influx of starters” post.

Good teams with good rosters should gamble at pick 67. Maybe.

I agree, but who in Round 3 is going to be a plug n play guy? Not many players, most are projects or will need time..

Plus, you can still build with cuts and remaining free agents after day 3

erickench wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:53 pm I don't get it. Don't we have enough pass rushers? Why Keyron Crawford?

Who are our pass rusher? Think about it then you'll find out why we picked Crawford

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:40 pm Looks like it’s lining up for Sarratt at 91.

LOL Please no. Don't do that to me

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:54 pm Don't y'all get tired of justifying bad picks? I mean really. It never works out for you guys. This team is bombing Day 2 so far. One more pick to make it right.

Stukes was a good pick. Maybe a little early but not by much and a position of dire need. Crawford definitely wouldn't have been my first choice. I understand the thought. But wouldn't have went for that position myself. But he was picked right around where he should have been