Ashton Jeanty

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Arsenal Raider
SnakeMad Max
Posts: 1,810
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:40 am
Has given High Fives: 322 times
Received High Fives: 163 times

Ashton Jeanty

Unread post by Arsenal Raider »

Welcome aboard!
These users gave a High Five to the author Arsenal Raider for the post:
Corleone
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,329
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1063 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

I did not want Jeanty (not a knock on him, I just do not like to draft RB's that high). That being said, I completely understand drafting him (he is that good). However, how the f[raiders_icon]ck do you not follow up his selection by drafting a guard (not saying anything negative about Bech). There were MANY quality guards available who would be day one starters. Every dumb fan knew guard was a HUGE need and even a more dire a need if you want to protect your investment (Jeanty). Jeanty (if given a chance by running behind a real NFL OL) could be special and give us a GREAT young nucleus (with Brock).

I am not going to crucify the administration by signing Cappa (they took a chance). I will crucify the administration on two fronts. Parham was already deemed WORTHLESS and GARBAGE. How the f[raiders_icon]ck is he still starting? Secondly, the change in positions is stupidity at its finest. Why aren't we playing guys at positions to optimize their success. JPJ should be playing center. Why f[raiders_icon]ck with this kid and cut his balls off while he is still developing? Head scratchers for sure. I am trying not to be a Monday morning QB. Just venting like we all love to do.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, The Real CK, MexicanHulk
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1112 times
Received High Fives: 571 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

He shown that if you give him a crease, he can do good things with the ball. Consistently get him past the LOS and he'll be a great asset.
User avatar
Raider_Len
Posts: 2,230
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:46 am
Location: Raiders fan purgatory
Has given High Fives: 19 times
Received High Fives: 77 times

Unread post by Raider_Len »

Opoponax50 wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 9:13 am He shown that if you give him a crease, he can do good things with the ball. Consistently get him past the LOS and he'll be a great asset.
I just wonder where he’d have been picked if we had selected Membou instead.
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,428
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 444 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

Raider_Len wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:32 am I just wonder where he’d have been picked if we had selected Membou instead.
If I had to guess, Dallas. I remember them being very interested. Chicago was in on him too and they turned heads with the Colston pick, so maybe they had him circled all along or thought Jeanty may have fell to them.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 4:34 am Taking Jeanty was absolutely the right decision. I won't kill the staff for that. I will however kill them for not following up with O linemen the next 2 picks. It even looks worse when your 2nd and 3rd round picks can't get on the field.
That's not a good answer though for this year. Even following up on the next 2 picks for OL, they would be non-blue chip rookie lineman.
We needed to get control of this online immediately and only vet FA's could have filled the gap.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 339 times
Received High Fives: 866 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Hindsight is 20/20 but Membou in the first, best G available in the 2nd and Skat in the 3rd would have been a homerun.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 3):
raider_kin, Cruisin with Tooz, Opoponax50
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,562
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 853 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Membou wouldn't help us running inside zone to the left.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,283
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 918 times
Received High Fives: 2140 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

SkullCrusher wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 12:54 pm That's not a good answer though for this year. Even following up on the next 2 picks for OL, they would be non-blue chip rookie lineman.
We needed to get control of this online immediately and only vet FA's could have filled the gap.
Again, Tate Ratledge and others were available in Rd 2. Guards do not need to be blue chip. Surely u know that. And Tate looks like a stud
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:26 pm Again, Tate Ratledge and others were available in Rd 2. Guards do not need to be blue chip. Surely u know that. And Tate looks like a stud
Can you count on anyone being there who is day one ready at a certain point in the draft?
I wouldn't expect any non-blue chip guard even to be ready to go that would be part of a good oline.
Can it happen? Sure.
Should you count on it? No.
You need proven people already and to be supplanted by younger players earning it.

That said the competition here isn't high at all.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2978 times

Unread post by Attyla »

SkullCrusher wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:52 pm Can you count on anyone being there who is day one ready at a certain point in the draft?
I wouldn't expect any non-blue chip guard even to be ready to go that would be part of a good oline.
Can it happen? Sure.
Should you count on it? No.
You need proven people already and to be supplanted by younger players earning it.

That said the competition here isn't high at all.
we should have taken a swing at a couple linemen for sure, I think it was not even debatable in the moment. I am not disappointed in our draft at all, but we did have a couple times where we could have dipped into that pool
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Attyla wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:55 pm we should have taken a swing at a couple linemen for sure, I think it was not even debatable in the moment. I am not disappointed in our draft at all, but we did have a couple times where we could have dipped into that pool
Yeah I'm all about the oline, but I'm talking counting on no first round rookies fielding a quality oline immediately.
Still doesn't mean you don't pick, but you have proven answers already, unless you do go first round.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2978 times

Unread post by Attyla »

SkullCrusher wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 2:09 pm Yeah I'm all about the oline, but I'm talking counting on no first round rookies fielding a quality oline immediately.
Still doesn't mean you don't pick, but you have proven answers already, unless you do go first round.
rookie Olinemen are a crapshoot. Even top picks sometimes need time to figure it out.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
SkullCrusher, BoKnows81
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,417
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 339 times
Received High Fives: 866 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

mranquales wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:26 pm Membou wouldn't help us running inside zone to the left.
Yeah but Glaze sucks.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,562
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 853 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

LayneStaley wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 3:41 pm Yeah but Glaze sucks.
I look at it this way:

How wide is the gap between DJ Glaze and Membou?

How wide is the gap between Jeanty and RB2 & 3?

DJ Glaze is a second-year player who was good enough to get the starting job as a rookie. He still has a lot to learn but at this point he is a fringe starter/ solid stop-gap RT. The gap between Membou and Glaze is there, but not that wide.

Meanwhile, the gap between Jeanty (generational) and RB2 is so great that you have to take Jeanty.

Membou would have to be all-pro to take him over Jeanty. And even then, it wouldn't change our running game, seeing as most of our runs are inside zone to the left. Even when it comes to pass-blocking, most of our problems are at guard.

Another thing to consider: if we DON'T take Jeanty, and he goes to the Chargers, we would be singing a completely different tune.
These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post (total 3):
raider_kin, Dr Death, BoKnows81
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2714 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

mranquales wrote: Fri Sep 26, 2025 4:05 pm I look at it this way:

How wide is the gap between DJ Glaze and Membou?

How wide is the gap between Jeanty and RB2 & 3?

DJ Glaze is a second-year player who was good enough to get the starting job as a rookie. He still has a lot to learn but at this point he is a fringe starter/ solid stop-gap RT. The gap between Membou and Glaze is there, but not that wide.

Meanwhile, the gap between Jeanty (generational) and RB2 is so great that you have to take Jeanty.

Membou would have to be all-pro to take him over Jeanty. And even then, it wouldn't change our running game, seeing as most of our runs are inside zone to the left. Even when it comes to pass-blocking, most of our problems are at guard.

Another thing to consider, if we DON'T take Jeanty, and he goes to the Chargers, we would be singing a completely different tune.
Nice analysis, especially the Charger thing. Yeah, there would be coronaries here aplenty about that.

PS For full disclosure I wanted Graham, and when he was gone by our pick I really don't know what I would have done if in charge, so I'm not saying I knew better. Jeanty seemed right at that spot, okay with it.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post:
Dr Death
Post Reply