He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,608
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 163 times
Received High Fives: 791 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,396
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 860 times
Received High Fives: 1680 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

Basketball video?
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
Rainman56
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 208 times
Received High Fives: 442 times

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

At this point we might as well get a complete clean state from the time in Oakland,

Maxx would get us at least one first round pick.
User avatar
NewEraX25
Posts: 2,732
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:46 pm
Received High Fives: 160 times

Unread post by NewEraX25 »

I don't get how he would command more than Micah. Micah beat him out in most of the meaningful stats while having 200 less snaps played, and that's with Maxx sitting out, so that snap count gap would have been even larger.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,044
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2063 times
Received High Fives: 2765 times

Unread post by chucker »

I've been vocal in saying I'd rather keep him, but it definitely depends upon the price offered. That's the case with anyone other than perhaps a QB. There is nothing wrong with keeping great players. It's also worth listening if someone is calling. But I don't care if Maxx loves Vrabel - he'll play where we want him to play, whether that's for the Raiders or whatever team gives us an offer that makes it worth letting him go. I also don't think Vrabel or the Pats care right now where Maxx wants to play - they've got other things to worry about this week.

If it's one first rounder in offer, well f[raiders_icon]ck off with that. If it's beyond the Parsons deal then for sure you have to consider the details - but I doubt that it would be that much. Don't marry yourself to moving on from him or you'll negatively impact the trade value. The Raiders should be, at least publicly, talking about how much they want Maxx as part of the future.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
dred, Goodtimes333
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,127
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 509 times
Received High Fives: 655 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

So I guess this has been posted..

User avatar
Rainman56
Posts: 12,526
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
Location: Underground
Has given High Fives: 515 times
Received High Fives: 346 times

Unread post by Rainman56 »

bringdafunk wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 2:35 pm Tired of all the yapping. Either request a trade or STFU.
Yep
These users gave a High Five to the author Rainman56 for the post (total 4):
Swagron, Goodtimes333, The Silver Pillager, Dr Death
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,806
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 972 times

Unread post by Viper »

chucker wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 4:05 pm I've been vocal in saying I'd rather keep him, but it definitely depends upon the price offered. That's the case with anyone other than perhaps a QB. There is nothing wrong with keeping great players. It's also worth listening if someone is calling. But I don't care if Maxx loves Vrabel - he'll play where we want him to play, whether that's for the Raiders or whatever team gives us an offer that makes it worth letting him go. I also don't think Vrabel or the Pats care right now where Maxx wants to play - they've got other things to worry about this week.

If it's one first rounder in offer, well f[raiders_icon]ck off with that. If it's beyond the Parsons deal then for sure you have to consider the details - but I doubt that it would be that much. Don't marry yourself to moving on from him or you'll negatively impact the trade value. The Raiders should be, at least publicly, talking about how much they want Maxx as part of the future.
Maxx is under contract and all but the new staff would be best served if in fact he does want a trade, you then try to accommodate him, with fair value being the minimum. New regime needs to focus on building this team and they don’t need the distraction from the one player that most look to as the center piece of the franchise.
Just my thoughts
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Rainman56
User avatar
BlackShield
Posts: 2,229
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 36 times
Received High Fives: 39 times

Unread post by BlackShield »

maxx has been the one constant for a lot of bad years...thanks for your service and non-stop motor.

if he wants out to move to a contender and get a chip, give him that

me, i'd love to get reese or bain on defense from a maxx trade after selecting fernando with the #1 overall...it would be equivalent to the texans drafting stroud on offense and will anderson on defense...talk about turning around a franchise...
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,127
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 509 times
Received High Fives: 655 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

BlackShield wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 5:29 pm maxx has been the one constant for a lot of bad years...thanks for your service and non-stop motor.

if he wants out to move to a contender and get a chip, give him that

me, i'd love to get reese or bain on defense from a maxx trade after selecting fernando with the #1 overall...it would be equivalent to the texans drafting stroud on offense and will anderson on defense...talk about turning around a franchise...
Heres my issue though, Im not trading him to a contender whose doesn't have a pick less than 15 or better in this draft..
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
BotesBoats
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 45 times
Received High Fives: 99 times

Unread post by BotesBoats »

BlackShield wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 5:29 pm maxx has been the one constant for a lot of bad years...thanks for your service and non-stop motor.

if he wants out to move to a contender and get a chip, give him that

me, i'd love to get reese or bain on defense from a maxx trade after selecting fernando with the #1 overall...it would be equivalent to the texans drafting stroud on offense and will anderson on defense...talk about turning around a franchise...
Bain would bring game day costumes to a whole new level.

Seriously though, I'm on the side of I'd rather we kept maxx. But Maxx for Bain+ maybe another ancillary piece seems like a pretty good deal. That would get me excited.
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,208
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 448 times

Unread post by vtraider »

Cleveland
Dallas
Rams
Jets

Those are the
Teams with 2 firsts this year where one is in the top half of the draft bidding starts there but I would rather keep him
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,735
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 624 times
Received High Fives: 1034 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Getting the picks especially high picks would be nice, a different angle would be say a 2nd rounder or maybe 3rd and an or olineman or dlineman comparable to Maxx's status with him ideally being a few years younger. I think I'd be satisfied with that
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,127
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 509 times
Received High Fives: 655 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

vtraider wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 5:46 pm Cleveland
Dallas
Rams
Jets

Those are the
Teams with 2 firsts this year where one is in the top half of the draft bidding starts there but I would rather keep him
I want the Jets 1st 2 picks in this draft, and I want next years 2nd
User avatar
vtraider
Bo KnowsThe AssassinAC/DCBowersFernandoJeanty
Posts: 8,208
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 448 times

Unread post by vtraider »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:08 pm I want the Jets 1st 2 picks in this draft, and I want next years 2nd
Like I said. That's where it starts. Not where it ends
User avatar
riseNraid09
Posts: 1,559
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
Has given High Fives: 166 times
Received High Fives: 212 times

Unread post by riseNraid09 »

vtraider wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 5:46 pm Cleveland
Dallas
Rams
Jets

Those are the
Teams with 2 firsts this year where one is in the top half of the draft bidding starts there but I would rather keep him
I think Dallas would be a solid trade partner here... they have the 12th overall pick, and will be undoubtedly looking to bolster their defense. Most mock drafts have them selecting and edge rusher with this pick anyway, so why not get a proven, dominate player at that position instead? Plus, Clowney is old as shit.

the Raiders could turn around and use that pick on someone likeee... uh, Jordyn Tyson? I'd be all for that.
Post Reply