He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2714 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 8:26 am i agree 100 pct

raven d fell off a cliff last yr and i dont see it recovering much this yr
offense is on the downside, eventually king henry is gonna give, you cant get pounded like he does and not get hurt over time, same goes for lamar whom was never a great passer (avg ) it was always his legs that made him elite and now he is showing age and getting injured more n more
Plus Hendrickson is old and injured, I can't believe he will hold up. My guess is that the Raven fans will soon regret not having Maxx.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsMad StorkBowersFernandoJeantyMan from Mars
Posts: 2,108
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 769 times
Received High Fives: 1011 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

raider_kin wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:42 am Plus Hendrickson is old and injured, I can't believe he will hold up. My guess is that the Raven fans will soon regret not having Maxx.
fired a true winning coach, replaced with rookie coach
lost an all pro center off of an oline that already had issues last yr

ravens are on the down slide for sure
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,283
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 918 times
Received High Fives: 2141 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

raider_kin wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:42 am Plus Hendrickson is old and injured, I can't believe he will hold up. My guess is that the Raven fans will soon regret not having Maxx.
We won't know that for a couple years.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, rich72
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2978 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 10:45 am We won't know that for a couple years.
yep, and saying the Ravens are on the downside is also questionable. Ozzie Newsome is a a great talent evaluator, not good, he his great. I don't count out the Ravens to pivot to be successful. They have proven that time and again.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
rich72
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,689
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1112 times
Received High Fives: 571 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

raiders93 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 11:34 pm I get the whole tampering period = nothing is real thing… but it’s kind of getting to the point where you wonder how this doesn’t get investigated.

I mean the more info that comes out, the more it looks like Baltimore entered a trade agreement that they never intended to fulfil. At some point youd think there’s a distinction between changing your mind and bad faith negotiations.
The very basic elements of a contract are offer, acceptance, and consideration. In this case someone made an offer, the other party accepted, but there was no exchange by either side (consideration). In this case, a formal contract signed by both parties, then broken by Baltimore would warrant a suit for breach of contract, but no formal contract was signed by either. Therefore, reliance e.g. the Raiders seemingly making FA moves based on what they believed to be an imminent trade does not count as reliance because there was no signed, formalized contract to begin with.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post (total 3):
Xramfan, Jeevo, GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,364
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 840 times
Received High Fives: 1669 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

Opoponax50 wrote: Sun Mar 22, 2026 1:11 pm The very basic elements of a contract are offer, acceptance, and consideration. In this case someone made an offer, the other party accepted, but there was no exchange by either side (consideration). In this case, a formal contract signed by both parties, then broken by Baltimore would warrant a suit for breach of contract, but no formal contract was signed by either. Therefore, reliance e.g. the Raiders seemingly making FA moves based on what they believed to be an imminent trade does not count as reliance because there was no signed, formalized contract to begin with.
I was going to say something like, "Both sides had a trade going but nothing was set in stone until signatures were on the dotted lines".

Then I read your response which is much more intelligent sounding so I changed my mind ;)
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,920
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1508 times
Received High Fives: 1555 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »



"Initial offers centered on Dallas' second first-round pick at No. 20, and defensive tackle Osa Odighizuwa. The Cowboys then offered their top first-rounder at No. 12 and a third-round pick. Ultimately, the Cowboys moved to No. 12 and their second-round pick, but the last two offers, sources said, did not include Odighizuwa, who was traded to the San Francisco 49ers for a third-round selection,"
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 2):
chucker, raidersince63
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,920
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1508 times
Received High Fives: 1555 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,299
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2714 times
Received High Fives: 1165 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

We found out we COULD get Hendrickson at the price we wanted, without giving up picks.
And we're slimeballs
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,920
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1508 times
Received High Fives: 1555 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raider_kin wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 6:16 pm We found out we COULD get Hendrickson at the price we wanted, without giving up picks.
And we're slimeballs
Yup. Does make me a bit angry/frustrated that we could have had Dallas’ 1st this year and 2nd next year, but then their team doctor became part of the whole Ravens fiasco.

Who knows, perhaps Dallas would have honored the transaction (if not slimeballs), or maybe Jerruh told the doctor to throw shade on the Ravens move to acquire Maxx because of sour grapes.

I don’t know. F’m all. Go Raiders.
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2754 times

Unread post by chucker »

I am shocked that teams were willing to offer that much for a guy who is months away from being healthy enough to go full speed. That's why I thought he wouldn't get traded, or at least not until much later in the offseason. I never wanted the Raiders to lower the asking price due to how much time he had left in recovery from surgery.

The next key date is the trade deadline, and I'm sure the chatter will ramp up well before that time unless the Raiders are quieting the critics and making a strong playoff push.
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 668 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

chucker wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 7:09 pm I am shocked that teams were willing to offer that much for a guy who is months away from being healthy enough to go full speed. That's why I thought he wouldn't get traded, or at least not until much later in the offseason. I never wanted the Raiders to lower the asking price due to how much time he had left in recovery from surgery.

The next key date is the trade deadline, and I'm sure the chatter will ramp up well before that time unless the Raiders are quieting the critics and making a strong playoff push.
I doubt we will get rid of him this season, that ship has sailed, maybe next season.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,160
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 412 times
Received High Fives: 285 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

raiders93 wrote: Sat Mar 21, 2026 11:34 pm I get the whole tampering period = nothing is real thing… but it’s kind of getting to the point where you wonder how this doesn’t get investigated.

I mean the more info that comes out, the more it looks like Baltimore entered a trade agreement that they never intended to fulfil. At some point youd think there’s a distinction between changing your mind and bad faith negotiations.
Was all premeditated.

As I was telling another member on this board that they offered something way beyond whatever the best offer was on the table (Dallas offer) and we jumped on it. They had absolutely no intention of actually going through with it. Third time now they have pulled this stunt.
User avatar
Sold My Soul
Posts: 17,838
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: Somewhere In Time
Has given High Fives: 170 times
Received High Fives: 412 times

Unread post by Sold My Soul »

Get over it. Raiders got played.

Raiders still got Mad Maxx....

In what way does that suck?
These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, BoKnows81
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,320
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 207 times
Received High Fives: 436 times

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2026 2:46 pm

"Initial offers centered on Dallas' second first-round pick at No. 20, and defensive tackle Osa Odighizuwa. The Cowboys then offered their top first-rounder at No. 12 and a third-round pick. Ultimately, the Cowboys moved to No. 12 and their second-round pick, but the last two offers, sources said, did not include Odighizuwa, who was traded to the San Francisco 49ers for a third-round selection,"
Why did we say no?
Post Reply