He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 818 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,703
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1864 times
Received High Fives: 1150 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Any thoughts of trading Maxx for two number 1s and then go get Trey Hendrickson or any other stud that will be a free agent?. Trey isn't Maxx but not bad either. Then use the pick this year for the oline or wide receiver. Go for the total rebuild with Mendoza, Jeanty and Bowers. We could end up with over 120 million in cap space. And that's not counting the NFL yearly cap increase.

Hey Mr Jones, Maxx for #12 and #20.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
Swagron
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Rabidraider wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 7:18 am Any thoughts of trading Maxx for two number 1s and then go get Trey Hendrickson or any other stud that will be a free agent?. Trey isn't Maxx but not bad either. Then use the pick this year for the oline or wide receiver. Go for the total rebuild with Mendoza, Jeanty and Bowers. We could end up with over 120 million in cap space. And that's not counting the NFL yearly cap increase.

Hey Mr Jones, Maxx for #12 and #20.
TWO #1s would be great but I've read a lot saying that for multiple reasons, Maxx may not bring 2 #1s...maybe a #1and a #2.

But who knows for sure? Jerry Jones may do something characteristically outrageous by trying to make up for his questionable move to let Parsons go.
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,714
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Rabidraider wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 7:18 am Any thoughts of trading Maxx for two number 1s and then go get Trey Hendrickson or any other stud that will be a free agent?. Trey isn't Maxx but not bad either. Then use the pick this year for the oline or wide receiver. Go for the total rebuild with Mendoza, Jeanty and Bowers. We could end up with over 120 million in cap space. And that's not counting the NFL yearly cap increase.

Hey Mr Jones, Maxx for #12 and #20.
I remember there were people on here that wanted to trade our first this year for Hendrickson. Thank God people on here aren't actually calling the shots
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,852
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 416 times
Received High Fives: 798 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

raidersince63 wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 7:55 am TWO #1s would be great but I've read a lot saying that for multiple reasons, Maxx may not bring 2 #1s...maybe a #1and a #2.

But who knows for sure? Jerry Jones may do something characteristically outrageous by trying to make up for his questionable move to let Parsons go.
Two firsts does seem like too much for Maxx, but firsts aren’t created equal and the most likely trade partners would tend to have lower picks. Still don’t think we’d get two of them.
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1162 times
Received High Fives: 449 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Hellbound wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 8:10 am I remember there were people on here that wanted to trade our first this year for Hendrickson. Thank God people on here aren't actually calling the shots
First, I'm glad The Raiders didn't do that, but second if they had The Raiders wouldn't have the first pick overall.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1246 times
Received High Fives: 2983 times

Unread post by Attyla »

RickRyb wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 9:18 am First, I'm glad The Raiders didn't do that, but second if they had The Raiders wouldn't have the first pick overall.
can you have a better pick than the first overall?
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
RickRyb
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,685
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 1105 times
Received High Fives: 573 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Jeevo wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 9:11 am Two firsts does seem like too much for Maxx, but firsts aren’t created equal and the most likely trade partners would tend to have lower picks. Still don’t think we’d get two of them.
If it's a playoff team or one close enough to be a playoff team, then two first rounders would be appropriate.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
RickRyb
The Assassin
Posts: 1,597
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1162 times
Received High Fives: 449 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Attyla wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 9:21 am can you have a better pick than the first overall?
Of course not. But if anyone is going to play the "what if" game you have to factor in the result of the "what if".
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,714
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 615 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

RickRyb wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 9:18 am First, I'm glad The Raiders didn't do that, but second if they had The Raiders wouldn't have the first pick overall.
Exactly
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
RickRyb
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Jeevo wrote: Sat Jan 10, 2026 9:11 am Two firsts does seem like too much for Maxx, but firsts aren’t created equal and the most likely trade partners would tend to have lower picks. Still don’t think we’d get two of them.
Yeah, like I mentioned earlier, maybe Jerry Jones might cough up multiple 1st round picks because the Cowboys are like a ship adrift at sea with no compass...SF would also make a good fit but like you say, those would also likely be higher #1s in the first round.
I guess some teams value veterans more than drafting unproven youngsters. But for more longevity and consistency, I think there should be somewhat of a balance between the 2.
User avatar
Southshield
Posts: 2,470
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Concord, CA
Has given High Fives: 56 times
Received High Fives: 104 times

Unread post by Southshield »

User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

I think many of us felt that this was coming...neither Maxx nor the Raiders have been saying much about the other for the last month or so...seems to me Maxx is as good as gone.

Happy trails.
User avatar
STHfrontrow
Posts: 1,023
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 48 times
Received High Fives: 89 times

Unread post by STHfrontrow »

On one hand the Raiders would be stupid to get rid of Maxx.

On the other they haven't won anything with him.

My vote would be on keeping him unless the Raiders are blown away with an offer.
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,305
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 825 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Southshield wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 1:52 pm
Confused by “the day it happened” what happened? Was there more to this with more context?
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
Oaktownonly
User avatar
tatalalicious
Posts: 1,161
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 78 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by tatalalicious »

STHfrontrow wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 2:13 pm On one hand the Raiders would be stupid to get rid of Maxx.

On the other they haven't won anything with him.

My vote would be on keeping him unless the Raiders are blown away with an offer.
It should be before the draft for sure, I'd have no problem with them trading him. Wonder what he'd get on the market.
Post Reply