The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,596
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 625 times
Received High Fives: 550 times

The Tankathon thread,i.e., the 2026 Draft

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,735
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 625 times
Received High Fives: 1034 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

BoJacksonRules wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:53 pm Woods is overrated. Someone also stated we need 3 new starting Olineman, it’s more like 2. I have no problem with Miller, JPJ, and Glaze. In fact all 3 would look far better if we didn’t have the 2 weak links on the IOL. Before I get roasted on Glaze, I’m tracking he’s only average, but he should continue to get better. If he doesn’t than he’ll be replaced in good time.
Glaze is average at best and JPJ and Miller can't stay on the field. We need to invest on the oline
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
BoJacksonRules
Posts: 2,690
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Has given High Fives: 341 times
Received High Fives: 160 times

Unread post by BoJacksonRules »

Hellbound wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:26 pm Glaze is average at best and JPJ and Miller can't stay on the field. We need to invest on the oline
Agreed Oline and QB are our biggest needs
These users gave a High Five to the author BoJacksonRules for the post (total 2):
Hellbound, Arsenal Raider
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,625
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 889 times
Received High Fives: 278 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 7:56 am And I know for a fact that you never claimed Mack would be a superstar.
Then you'd be wrong.
And the "deleted" claim was debunked repeatedly.
Gaslighting.

It was one of the few threads I made on this site, so I remember it clearly, because it was right before my thread privileges were taken away for something I was right about.

:rofl: Oh, let me guess, you're going to attempt to gaslight by stating I never ever made a thread on this site?

:rofl: And calling a bad player bad and a good player good isn't a special power, goofy. If I watch college tape of a player and decide he's not talented based of obvious evidence, where the f[raiders_icon]ck do you draw the connection with being adapt at winning the lottery?

:rofl: I swear you're a dumb ass Dr. Phil-ass boy.
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,032
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 378 times
Received High Fives: 274 times

Unread post by rcraider »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:38 am Raiders will end up winning the next three and draft out of the top 10. If that is the case OT all the way. I don't want them selling the farm to draft a QB until the team is ready to help him succeed. Sellers or the kid from Arkansas will be available later rounds if we're out of the top 10.
Sellers isn't entering the draft, he's a sophomore and isn't having a good year; would be silly to enter when your stock is low, and his camp has already said they are there to get an education.
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,649
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 664 times
Received High Fives: 361 times

Unread post by rich72 »

I would trade down if possible and snag more picks, go O-line and CB.
User avatar
Spurs Raider
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2024 7:05 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 41 times

Unread post by Spurs Raider »

Increasingly clear this is another lost season so focus is once again on a rebuild and the draft.

Unless Mendoza or Simpson is within reach in the 1st then all our consideration should be on improving the trenches - I know it's the same old rhetoric but this is what the roster urgently needs.

The biggest question mark is do we trust this current coaching staff to oversee this or do we press reset again?
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 4,042
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 9 times
Received High Fives: 354 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

mranquales wrote: Sun Nov 16, 2025 7:24 pm I stated way before that draft that Khalil Mack would be a superstar. I even had a thread deleted on this site claiming as much.

I also stated correctly that Derek Carr would be our franchise QB when Matt Schuab was our starter.
Mostly everyone stated those things about Mack & Carr simply because it was clear to see

I called out Maxx Crosby as a great mid round guy who have measurable you could develop into being a starter it doesn’t make me a draft guru & to balance that i was 50/50 between him & Anthony Nelson as to who would be better as both tested great.
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 1,032
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 378 times
Received High Fives: 274 times

Unread post by rcraider »

Spurs Raider wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:33 am Increasingly clear this is another lost season so focus is once again on a rebuild and the draft.

Unless Mendoza or Simpson is within reach in the 1st then all our consideration should be on improving the trenches - I know it's the same old rhetoric but this is what the roster urgently needs.

The biggest question mark is do we trust this current coaching staff to oversee this or do we press reset again?
I have no faith in this shit show, I say move on, I know people will argue that Carroll needs time to get his players bla bla bla , We are just wasting time, by the time Carroll gets what he wants he'll be on the way out and the next guy will come in and turn the roster over.
The sad thing is who are you gonna get to come in and take this job ? nobody wants to come here to this circus.
These users gave a High Five to the author rcraider for the post (total 4):
BoKnows81, Sloth_Fratelli, Spurs Raider, Lobo
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 118 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

Spurs Raider wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:33 am Increasingly clear this is another lost season so focus is once again on a rebuild and the draft.

Unless Mendoza or Simpson is within reach in the 1st then all our consideration should be on improving the trenches - I know it's the same old rhetoric but this is what the roster urgently needs.

The biggest question mark is do we trust this current coaching staff to oversee this or do we press reset again?
Yep, both lines. We need to sign 2 monster interiors guys to go with JPJ, week after week, Meredith, was lunch for every defensive line we faced. IF that game wrecking DT is available in the first, you jump on it. Pair that with the DT depth we've built with Butler/Laulu. Both lines are a problem.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,345
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1065 times
Received High Fives: 590 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Pete is a sly one. He knew Raiders would suck ass. Take abuse for the year and then get paid staying home for 2 more years. Its the Raiders way. The question is who would want to take on this job? Its difficult to pluck coaches from college as many of them are making more $ than NFL HC's. I doubt a highly respected NFL coordinator would want to sabotage his career. Maybe AP's assistant coach from the high school team he coached is on the radar.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 2):
Sloth_Fratelli, The Real CK
User avatar
Curay7680
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:19 am
Has given High Fives: 743 times
Received High Fives: 37 times

Unread post by Curay7680 »

Hellbound wrote: Thu Nov 13, 2025 8:46 pm Lol...so these dingleberries are actually throwing a theory around that, we are eyeing a qb that can't even be drafted for what, 2-3 more years?
Renz is a dingleberry, Sanjit on the other hand is pretty reasonable and I enjoy watching him but that is just me.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2950 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Nope it is a fact that you never called Mack a "superstar" before he was drafted, and you never created a thread that got deleted.


And your insults aside, you should give up while you are way behind. I will take the high road and not insult you further. But the fact that you resorted to calling names shows that you were triggered yet again. God I love when I win
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
RaiderFan1
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,625
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 889 times
Received High Fives: 278 times

Unread post by mranquales »

CWood24 wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 2:27 am I called out Maxx Crosby as a great mid round guy who have measurable you could develop into being a starter it doesn’t make me a draft guru & to balance that i was 50/50 between him & Anthony Nelson as to who would be better as both tested great.
:rofl: Has nothing to do with being a draft guru. They literally claimed that I've never been right about anything. This has been stated multiple times by multiple posters.

It also goes beyond drafting. I was in the minority about Minshew. The majority opinion was AOC was inferior to Minshew, reality showed the opposite.

:rofl: I simply calling out the lying and gaslighting in an attempt to portray me a certain way.

:rofl: I've been right way more than I've been wrong, and that fact for some reason bothers them. Has nothing to do with having special powers or anything like that.
Attyla wrote: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:49 am Nope it is a fact that you never called Mack a "superstar" before he was drafted, and you never created a thread that got deleted.
:rofl: My thread making privileges were taken away. This has been confirmed by the owner of this site. As a result, any thread I made (obviously) disappears-- or is no longer able to be seen by common posters.

My thread literally was named, "Superstar Mack". My memory is great and like I explained prior, I've only made a few threads, so I remember all of them.

:rofl: Again, your weak attempt at semantics and gaslighting doesn't work on me.

:rofl: So, you want to play semantics over the word "deleted"? Okay, bro.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1236 times
Received High Fives: 2950 times

Unread post by Attyla »

When you resort to lies and insults, it just makes you look bad.

You lied, you never created the thread and thus it was never deleted.
Period
User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 122 times
Received High Fives: 326 times

Unread post by DrDUne »

The good news - we are primed to draft BPA. lol.

These users gave a High Five to the author DrDUne for the post:
RI RAIDER
Post Reply