Game day thread: Browns@Raiders

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,333
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 135 times
Received High Fives: 729 times

Game day thread: Browns@Raiders

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Oh yeah- there’s a game today. I almost forgot. Unfortunately I think we lower our draft picks and win one in a squeaker. Gino will have his best game since game #1. Yes a contrarian feeling. I think we might see a rookie offensive lineman or two play also. What can that hurt at this point? Raider 20 Browns 17.

I am playing golf so will check it out when I get home.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 2):
EaglevShark, Dr Death
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,920
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1508 times
Received High Fives: 1555 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raiderjohn wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 8:07 am Exactly, that hierarchy was broken when Mark stepped in and began hiring the HC, which gave the HC more power than the GM in personnel decisions. Mayock? Telesco - AP, I would think Telesco had more power over the draft due to AP's lack of any experience, but that was 1 year. In the least AP was willing to play the top 3 picks.
Mayock I have the most sympathy for. He was a dude that had a decent hit-rate on ranking guys for a sports publication. Mark and Gru destroyed his life.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,563
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 856 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 7:56 am Show me where I claimed they would win. I said I want a win. I said we should win. I never said we would win.
:rofl: Semantics. I claimed we would lose. You claimed the opposite of my stance. You were wrong.
Judkins got two scores. He may not have gotten a ton of yards but he got the ugly yards they needed.
Jeanty got ugly yards and scored. Doesn't change the facts. One of Judkins touchdowns is because Isiah Bonds fell down at the one-yard line.

And Sanders may not even start in two weeks.
And you'd be wrong. Again.
Saying shit like he will start the rest of the year based on yesterday? fck that noise.
He threw triple the air yards per pass of any Browns QB this season. Completed one of the longest passes of the season for the Browns. First rookie QB in 20 years to win for the Browns. If not for Jeudy showboating and Bond slipping, he potentially has 3 TDs.
And you said it would establish him as their FRANCHISE QB.
It did. He won the game.

A rookie who had zero reps all year was able to win his first start with only one week of prep. Despite that, he got his team into the redzone 4 times with his arm, was poised in the pocket, didn't yell at his teammates when he made a mistake, and had the entire team rallying behind him and playing with fire.

Myles Garrett's energy when Sanders is the QB is day and night different compared to win Gabriel is out there.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 9:20 am :rofl: Semantics. I claimed we would lose. You claimed the opposite of my stance. You were wrong.



Jeanty got ugly yards and scored. Doesn't change the facts. One of Judkins touchdowns is because Isiah Bonds fell down at the one-yard line.




And you'd be wrong. Again.



He threw triple the air yards per pass of any Browns QB this season. Completed one of the longest passes of the season for the Browns. First rookie QB in 20 years to win for the Browns. If not for Jeudy showboating and Bond slipping, he potentially has 3 TDs.



It did. He won the game.

A rookie who had zero reps all year was able to win his first start with only one week of prep. Despite that, he got his team into the redzone 4 times with his arm, was poised in the pocket, didn't yell at his teammates when he made a mistake, and had the entire team rallying behind him and playing with fire.

Myles Garrett's energy when Sanders is the QB is day and night different compared to win Gabriel is out there.
No, not semantics. Facts
Judkins was a decisive part of their game, which was to keep Sanders from f[raiders_icon]cking things up. Again facts
And no, I said he may not start in two weeks. Not will not. Again facts
And no, he threw a pass to the sidelines, the receiver got the yards. Again facts
And you site potential, I state facts. Potential means dick
And no, he is not a "franchise" QB after one start throwing 50% completion rate. Again, facts

Your opinion does not measure up to facts. You lost simply be getting up this morning. The rest was just too easy.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,563
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 856 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 9:59 am No, not semantics. Facts
Almost everything you state is semantics.
Judkins was a decisive part of their game
As is every starting running back in the NFL. If you are talking about a "run-first" offensive philosophy, every team that doesn't have an elite QB does that. Even Josh Allen was carried by his run game and special teams last week.
to keep Sanders from fcking things up. Again facts
Wrong. They had the same offensive approach when Dillian Gabriel and Joe Flacco were starting. FACTS.
And no, I said he may not start in two weeks. Not will not. Again facts
Semantics. He is, so it doesn't matter what you meant. You're wrong. As usual.
And no, he threw a pass to the sidelines, the receiver got the yards. Again facts
He also threw a bomb off his back foot while avoiding a sack that was one yard away from being a TD. Facts. He also would have been in the redzone again after another major pass play to Jeudy. Facts.

Receivers sold Sanders just as much as they helped him. Facts.
And you site potential, I state facts. Potential means dick
All that matters is winning. FACTS. He won the game. FACTS. That makes him undefeated as a starter. FACTS. That makes him better than the other QB that's not undefeated. FACTS.
And no, he is not a "franchise" QB after one start throwing 50% completion rate. Again, facts
He is the "franchise QB" because he's the best QB on the team. FACTS. And no QB is good enough to dethrone him. FACTS.
Your opinion does not measure up to facts. You lost simply be getting up this morning. The rest was just too easy.
:rofl: Thank you for continuing to expose yourself as a biased and prejudiced debater, thereby ruining your credibility and the weight behind your words.

Especially considering that I am considered a top-level contributor in several other football and Raider related ventures. Nothing you guys do on here bothers me one bit. So, stick to the topic and continue to get destroyed.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

you really are a joke. Stating someone is the "best" on a team is an opinion. I get it that you don't understand basic English but it is an opinion.
And no, the spoon fed Sanders a vanilla playbook so he would not f[raiders_icon]ck things up and he still only hit 50% of his passes and that f[raiders_icon]cking stinker of an INT
So when you finally figure out what a fact is vs an opinion, get back to me junior
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,626
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1362 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Are you really arguing Sanders is a franchise qb with a poor game that beat a crap raiders team? I guess he will be going into the hall of fame next to Nick Mullens
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2141 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 11:02 am you really are a joke. Stating someone is the "best" on a team is an opinion. I get it that you don't understand basic English but it is an opinion.
And no, the spoon fed Sanders a vanilla playbook so he would not fck things up and he still only hit 50% of his passes and that fcking stinker of an INT
So when you finally figure out what a fact is vs an opinion, get back to me junior
This is the same dude that wants Hendon Hooker. Don't waste your finger strength on him.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Attyla
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,626
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1362 times

Unread post by DanKD »

BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 12:29 pm This is the same dude that wants Hendon Hooker. Don't waste your finger strength on him.
He got confused, he meant Handy from a Hooker
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, BoKnows81
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,563
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 856 times
Received High Fives: 265 times

Unread post by mranquales »

"You are what your record says you are."

-Bill Parcels

Shaduer Sanders right now is the best QB on the Browns. FACTS.

Thanks for playing!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Jesus, one f[raiders_icon]cking game.

You may be playing, but I think the deck is shorted about half its cards
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,793
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1082 times
Received High Fives: 995 times

Unread post by Willmark »

BoKnows81 wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 12:29 pm This is the same dude that wants Hendon Hooker. Don't waste your finger strength on him.
And didnt even know which Team Hooker was on.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,105
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 502 times
Received High Fives: 644 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sun Nov 23, 2025 6:15 pm I don't expect this crew to be here Kin. None of them. Except Spytek.
After this shitshow, everyone but Spytek needs to go and I mean
Image
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post (total 2):
BoKnows81, raider_kin
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 690
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 62 times
Received High Fives: 197 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

Definitely would have used a 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder on drafting Sander;

First time Sander played a full game and Raiders do have a fairly decent defense and did ok….
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,285
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 922 times
Received High Fives: 2141 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 2:22 am Definitely would have used a 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder on drafting Sander;

First time Sander played a full game and Raiders do have a fairly decent defense and did ok….
LMAO
User avatar
Hellbound
Woodson WhiskeySeabass
Posts: 6,719
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 617 times
Received High Fives: 1029 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

SuperRaider wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 2:22 am Definitely would have used a 2nd rounder or 3rd rounder on drafting Sander;

First time Sander played a full game and Raiders do have a fairly decent defense and did ok….
Sanders f[raiders_icon]cking sucks and so does this sorry ass Raider team including the defense
Post Reply