He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Corleone
SnakeThe AssassinBo KnowsThe ToozBowersSeabassMan from MarsFernandoJeanty+1+1
Posts: 20,607
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 164 times
Received High Fives: 815 times
Contact:

He's back! Maxx Crosby merged superthread

Unread post by Corleone »

Tank is full speed ahead!



These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
tnraidermg
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,416
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 340 times
Received High Fives: 873 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

RickRyb wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:22 pm Why would The Raiders even want to deal with Baltimore now?
I’d take less from Bears or Eagles. No f[raiders_icon]cking way would I deal with the Ravens for less.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
RickRyb
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,618
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1347 times

Unread post by DanKD »

0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 7):
Rabidraider, RickRyb, Goodtimes333, LayneStaley, Willmark, Arsenal Raider, Rainman56
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,058
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

Jeevo wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:19 pm Starting to hear some say that it’s a real possibility that the Ravens still acquire him, but for less. Makes sense really.
Source?

I’d think the level of bad blood would be insane. What I’d give to be a fly on the wall in spyteks office right now
User avatar
NewEraX25
Posts: 2,732
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 7:46 pm
Received High Fives: 160 times

Unread post by NewEraX25 »

Tatum wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:20 pm ok ... your take is valid. Yes the Ravens look foolish, very foolish.

at the other side ... Maxx's side ... he's going to give 200% effort no matter what. 200% as a Raven, 200% as a Las Vegas Raider (even if he doesn't want to be a Raider), 200% as a Chiefs player ... he will bring it, as long as he is physically able.

I pity the teams that have to play against him.
Why? We were 3-14 with him giving 1000 percent, nobody really fears him.
These users gave a High Five to the author NewEraX25 for the post:
Swagron
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,852
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 416 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

LayneStaley wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm I’d take less from Bears or Eagles. No f[raiders_icon]cking way would I deal with the Ravens for less.
C’mon, take the best deal. We can figure out how to f[raiders_icon]ck them at a later date.
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,159
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 289 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

If we can still afford the Linderbaum contract by hook or by crook and NOW they offer him more money does he go back? If he does that calls to question his character.

-He agreed to a contract already

-THEY traded for Maxx knowing they weren't going to be able to match other teams offers for him

-That in turn means having Maxx Crosby on there team was more important then him

-We wanted him so badly we made him the highest paid center in the NFL by a long shot. Higher than what they were asking for.

Does he now renege on that deal and go back to the team whose priority's were elsewhere? If he does that is a bad look.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,416
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 340 times
Received High Fives: 873 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

I wish Al was alive for this. He’d be dragging them through the mud.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 4):
Goodtimes333, ALLRAIDERWORLD21, raiderboyron, Owsley Stanley
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,703
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1864 times
Received High Fives: 1150 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm 0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again

If they did, every team would pull this bullshit. f[raiders_icon]ck Ravens. Trade Maxx to someone in the Ravens division.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,618
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1347 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Mark is weak but Brady has a lot of connections. Ravens may end up regretting this.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 4):
Rabidraider, LayneStaley, Raiders Baby, ALLRAIDERWORLD21
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,058
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 8 times
Received High Fives: 258 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

DanKD wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm 0% chance we agree to a reduced compensation deal with the Ravens. Absolutely f[raiders_icon]ck them, id never deal with them again
Yeah there is something bigger than pure rationality when it comes to the NFL. Just the same as you don’t trade elite players within your division… I don’t know that you give a discount to a team that just f[raiders_icon]cked you regardless of your other options.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,416
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 340 times
Received High Fives: 873 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Jeevo wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:25 pm C’mon, take the best deal. We can figure out how to f[raiders_icon]ck them at a later date.
I just don’t see Spytek or Brady letting the Ravens back out on a physical and then ask to pay less for the player when they made it clear they wanted 2 1s. I think Tom is probably in “f[raiders_icon]ck them” mode.
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,852
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 416 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Was listening to Tom Telesco on the possibility that Linderbaum backs out. He finds that very unlikely, says agents don’t agree to deals and then back out a day or two later.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
Rabidraider, 16 to 88, Steve007
User avatar
riseNraid09
Posts: 1,533
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
Has given High Fives: 156 times
Received High Fives: 200 times

Unread post by riseNraid09 »

I just stumbled on to this news... I couldn't help but laugh. Things were going wayyyy to well. the universe couldn't allow it and had to balance the scales somehow, I guess.

very curious to see how this is navigated... how many of those free agents would have to be sacrificed if Spytek is unable to find a suitable trade partner? One? Two?
These users gave a High Five to the author riseNraid09 for the post (total 2):
rich72, Raiders Baby
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 19,159
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 414 times
Received High Fives: 289 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

LayneStaley wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:11 pm

They have a history of being weasels.
When somebody show you who they are, believe them.
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post (total 2):
LayneStaley, RickRyb
User avatar
Jeevo
SnakeMad Stork
Posts: 14,852
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 416 times
Received High Fives: 795 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

LayneStaley wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2026 7:28 pm I just don’t see Spytek or Brady letting the Ravens back out on a physical and then ask to pay less for the player when they made it clear they wanted 2 1s. I think Tom is probably in “f[raiders_icon]ck them” mode.
You could be right, plus they may just think they can do better by waiting, assuming the hypothetical even exists.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
LayneStaley
Post Reply