Raiderstation

haji81872 wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 10:23 pm At least with a great line you can hand the ball off and move the ball. That is why we need to spend some high drafts picks and spend some money on FA to build a great line. Crappy line with a great QB you are still not going to be able to move the ball.

Hellbound wrote: Sat Oct 25, 2025 8:00 am Funny way of saying the KC oline sucked and Mahomes being an elite qb couldn't mask their problems being sacked 6 times, hitting him 11 and forcing 3 turnovers from him. Weird that the team with better line play (both sides) actually dominated and won that game

Funny you say Burrow is fine aside from his injuries. How does he accumulate those injuries? From getting beat up by his subpar oline. He doesn't give his team any chance at all when he's watching his team from the sidelines. That teams defense has nothing to do with his or his oline play so not sure why that was even brought up

Btw....me saying here are again is a fact. Not an opinion. People were complaining about the oline & Jacobs getting hit behind it. People are complaining about the oline & Jeanty getting hit behind it

Oaktown Superman wrote: Thu Oct 30, 2025 11:45 pm Even the best have bad games. But you put Mahomes in the Raiders offense, and he'd have them humming. Look at who he's throwing to. It's not like that's an elite WR and TE room.

Hellbound wrote: Sat Oct 25, 2025 7:16 am How did that mediocre at best oline work out for Mahomes in the SB last year? How'd that poor oline workout for Burrow this year? That elite qb has had the same amount of season ending injuries as he does playoff appearances. That's fine that you have your opinion. That's all it is though. Just as I have mine. I also have history on my side though. Will you get a fluke season out of an elite qb behind a poor oline? Sure. Is it sustainable success? Absolutely not. You said it yourself, it's a recipe for disaster

Give me the good to great oline and it won't matter who's at qb and/or what type of game plan you have

You can have the qb behind a sketchy oline

Again we both have different opinions and that's fine but no need to try and force your opinion off as a fact like you always do

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Fri Oct 31, 2025 6:19 pm That's my take as well. Not saying you don't need a good QB...you do and nobody will argue. But you need a line. Philly O was driven by Barkley running behind that O line. Mahomes had no chance with that patchwork line. Even though he got the to the SB. Teams have won with mediocre QBs but nobody has won with a bad O line.
We seriously need a good QB but this team does everything backwards. We have a horrid O line and no QB...let's grab a TE and a RB to build around. If we had a good line and a decent QB Jeanty and Bowers would be a force together

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Oct 31, 2025 6:32 pm

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 1:25 am A lot of smoke on this trade rumor. Multiple media outlets reporting..I’m sure it will get it own thread if it goes down..

https://raiderswire.usatoday.com/story/ ... 975298007/

Hellbound wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:51 am Has anyone with eyeballs watched Richardson play? Including college? He's worse than Geno

Attyla wrote: Sun Nov 02, 2025 4:54 am lot of potential, way too inaccurate, quit on his team.

You don't trade for potential with those red flags attached to the same player.