Geno Smith Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:01 pm
RaiderStation is the ultimate Las Vegas Raiders fan forum — join Raider Nation for bold takes, game-day analysis, news, rumors, and Silver & Black pride. Connect with fellow fans and be part of the discussion.
https://raiderstation.com/
Food.
It's kind of funny the defense was supposed to be the weak link by far and the reality has been the complete opposite. The defense hasn't been great but it's been good enough that the Raiders should probably be at least 3-3 or even 4-2 if the offense and special teams wasn't so bad.LayneStaley wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 6:39 pm If we were 3-3 with how bad the offense and ST has been I woulda been impressed.
If ST knew how to block for a fg, we would be 3-3LayneStaley wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 6:39 pm If we were 3-3 with how bad the offense and ST has been I woulda been impressed.
I don't know I have never seen such an easy name spelled wrong so often. Right up there with people calling someone looser than loser. Kind of takes the sting off the insultGoodTimeCharlie wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 4:41 pm I’m wondering if “Geno” is constantly misspelt “Gino” on account of all the interceptions.
I didn't think Geno was quite this bad..... he is. The O line sucks, but................rich72 wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 1:31 pm The Seahawks are contenders since they got rid of Geno, and thats after trading Metcalf as well. I think Geno can still turn it around but it has to happen this game.
OneDr Death wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 5:22 pm I didn't think Geno was quite this bad..... he is. The O line sucks, but................
If Geno can't improve over the next few games, he needs to go. This is just another typical Raiders season... regardless of coaching or players.
Winning is all that matters but there’s a sustainability issue with winning in spite of your QB - especially if you don’t have a top tier roster nearly everywhere else. Therein lies the problem - we don’t have a particularly good rushing attack or defence and special teams might be worse then either.ToastPatterson wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 6:33 pm So if Geno were playing this bad and were winning would we all say that he isn't pretty but is getting the job done. Just win baby?
Like Al used to say to Jimmy Plunkett; "It's not important that you play well, it's important that we win."
I realize we are not exactly winning but it could have gone either way in the Chicago game. If we beat the Chefs game then the entire tenor of this discussion changes considerably.
scary indeed.DrDUne wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:06 pm Hope for the best. “Expected to get a new contract”
That part scares me.
That is my understanding. We get 8M in cap and we have 18.5M in dead moneyWillmark wrote: Fri Oct 17, 2025 1:09 pm For those wondering (assuming I’m reading it right).
Cutting Geno next year is a 18.5 mil hit whether it’s pre or post June 1st as it’s the unpaid portion of signing bonus.
Strongly agreeheavyD wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 1:34 pm It's kind of funny the defense was supposed to be the weak link by far and the reality has been the complete opposite. The defense hasn't been great but it's been good enough that the Raiders should probably be at least 3-3 or even 4-2 if the offense and special teams wasn't so bad.