Raiderstation

[quote=rich72 post_id=1113205]Love really sucks, I dont think he has won any games he started.[/quote]To be fair he has only started one game

Just watching Baker Mayfield run one of the NFL's more complicated offenses and putting up 17 points against a good Denver defense in the first quarter (and now 24 total 5 minutes into the 2nd quarter). He's not making HOF level plays, but what he is able to do is successfully get the ball into the hands of his playmakers on a consistent basis.

I think he and Minshew should be our top two FA targets this offseason.

As for Love, he's now about where he should be had he been drafted where he should've been. He was never worthy of a first round pick, but now has been in the league a couple of years, got some experience and familiarity, and should soon be ready to start somewhere. And this is how it should be. Regardless of Mahomes, Burrow, and Allen, the reality remains the same that most rookies aren't ready to play at a high level right away.

I'd rather get a competent vet, develop a grinding run game, and finally------f[raiders_icon]cking finally build a great defense.

[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1113195]I didn't say you but thanks for letting me know, Mr. 80/20. [/quote]you quoted the guy who was referring to me.

Not rocket science. We can revisit the 80% in February. If he is back, you might disappear like a fart in the wind. If he is not, just remember 80% is not 100%.

[quote=Rte66BBQ post_id=1113003]Just cut him after the final game of the year. No need to wait till after the Superbowl.[/quote]Would we have to Bench him .... to keep him safe from an injury settlement?
(if the contract is guaranteed for injury?)
Its about that "bone break" time of the season ....

[quote=BigJerk post_id=1113214]Would we have to Bench him .... to keep him safe from an injury settlement?
(if the contract is guaranteed for injury?)
Its about that "bone break" time of the season ....[/quote]Yes they should bench him.Because he sucks and to keep from getting hurt

[quote=Attyla post_id=1113213]you quoted the guy who was referring to me.

Not rocket science. We can revisit the 80% in February. If he is back, you might disappear like a fart in the wind. If he is not, just remember 80% is not 100%.[/quote] Nice two way out. Betting both sides is a strategy for some. I'm 100% in that Carr will be 86ed, so yeah, let's put this one up on the wall.

[quote=rich72 post_id=1113201]Even the reporters are starting to talk about carr not being back. They used to stick up for him like they were his mama.[/quote]Some people refuse to read the tea leaves.

[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1113220] Nice two way out. Betting both sides is a strategy for some. I'm 100% in that Carr will be 86ed, so yeah, let's put this one up on the wall.[/quote]not betting both sides, intelligent enough to know that predictions of future events are never 100%. People have been predicting every year that Carr is toast but he keeps returning. I would move on but the guy who keeps him around has been pretty predictable so far. Talk again in February....or not. LOL

[quote=Attyla post_id=1113225]not betting both sides, intelligent enough to know that predictions of future events are never 100%. People have been predicting every year that Carr is toast but he keeps returning. I would move on but the guy who keeps him around has been pretty predictable so far. Talk again in February....or not. LOL[/quote]Nah, there is a reason why you emphasized 80/20 a second time. I'm far from stupid, you want that 20 to save you if need be.

[quote=Dark Horse post_id=1113234]Nah, there is a reason why you emphasized 80/20 a second time. I'm far from stupid, you want that 20 to save you if need be.[/quote]keep thinking that the future is 100%

I hadn't thought of the gauranteed for injury part of the contract. I think you guys may have a point about sitting him.

Would really suck to be looking to move on and then still have to pay him because he's injured.

[quote=Rte66BBQ post_id=1113269]I hadn't thought of the gauranteed for injury part of the contract. I think you guys may have a point about sitting him.

Would really suck to be looking to move on and then still have to pay him because he's injured.[/quote]That would be crazy and telling if he doesn’t play the next game.I’m sure he will,but a guy can dream.

Reddit is crazy. They are blaming McDaniels for “regressing” all the progress Carr made under Gruden.

[quote=Raidernation1979 post_id=1113272]Reddit is crazy. They are blaming McDaniels for “regressing” all the progress Carr made under Gruden. [/quote]What’s Reddit?

[quote=HesterLayes post_id=1113273]What’s Reddit?[/quote]I keep an eye on it primarily for news and whatnot. But the comments are insane.


https://www.reddit.com/r/raiders/