2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
-
Xramfan
- Posts: 18,355
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 842 times
- Received High Fives: 1669 times
2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
Who do we want?
Discuss
Discuss
- These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2983 times
he may be an afterthought because I see him as a top 2 in the second, could be wrong, but at worst I think the Bills could come calling unless they go Boston. So much at play in this top end of the round.Oaktown Superman wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:02 pm McDonald is preferred by most in here so youse nose that’s the kiss of death.
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 19,158
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 420 times
- Received High Fives: 298 times
we all knew who we were picking with the first pick so this is basically the starting point of the draft for us. In an unknown way that is…Attyla wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:19 pm he may be an afterthought because I see him as a top 2 in the second, could be wrong, but at worst I think the Bills could come calling unless they go Boston. So much at play in this top end of the round.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2983 times
yep, way too many options and any and all options are on the table. Trade into one of the top spots, trade down and pick up ammo or stand pat and take a day one starter. I want the third option but it has to make sense in the plan.16 to 88 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:47 pm we all knew who we were picking with the first pick so this is basically the starting point of the draft for us. In an unknown way that is…
- Marzan
- Posts: 2,867
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:39 pm
- Has given High Fives: 147 times
- Received High Fives: 137 times
At 36?!16 to 88 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:39 pm If McDonald’s is there, I’m guessing that’s who they go with. If not, I have a sneaky suspicion that they would like to draft Bernard.
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1246 times
- Received High Fives: 2983 times
Heads up for all the mock drafters out there. What is success in round one if you are a major player in the mock draft business? Try 7 picks right is outstanding and 3 right is considered very good.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/articles/g ... 03853.html
So, again, it has never been about being right, it has always been about clicks and conversation.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/articles/g ... 03853.html
So, again, it has never been about being right, it has always been about clicks and conversation.
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,086
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 763 times
- Received High Fives: 1006 times
mcshay and shrager r the best of the bunch...kiper has always been just good for tv ...anyone know if mayock did put out one ???
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,132
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 495 times
- Received High Fives: 209 times
I’d hate that. These are the WRs that are making people think this draft is deep at WR. I dislike most of them. Not a Labe, Fields, or Brazzell fan at all. I hope they’re not on the Raiders board. They have crap route running, deception in their footwork, nor much nuance at the WR position. They’re pretty much just size, speed guys. Or just one of the two. Without getting separation due to their IQ &, breaks in & out of their routes.Raider4Ever wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:15 am If no Boston at 36, which I don't think we'll take him there, then maybe Ja'Kobi Lane or Malachi Fields in subsequent rounds. Both are X-type WRs that can be had later on.
Boston, Hurst, C.Bell are a few of the exceptions. When it comes to size speed. They have more to their game than just that &, they use their size speed more intelligently in their game.
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,086
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 763 times
- Received High Fives: 1006 times
steve smith said his favorite wr in this draft was ted hurst ...i like him tooMexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 1:31 pm I’d hate that. These are the WRs that are making people think this draft is deep at WR. I dislike most of them. Not a Labe, Fields, or Brazzell fan at all. I hope they’re not on the Raiders board. They have crap route running, deception in their footwork, nor much nuance at the WR position. They’re pretty much just size, speed guys. Or just one of the two. Without getting separation due to their IQ &, breaks in & out of their routes.
Boston, Hurst, C.Bell are a few of the exceptions. When it comes to size speed. They have more to their game than just that &, they use their size speed more intelligently in their game.
- These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,086
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 763 times
- Received High Fives: 1006 times
steelers r trying to trade up for wr
2nd 56
3rd 76
3rd 85
3rd 99
raiders picking 36
would you trade down with the steelers for pick 56 and 76 ???
2nd 56
3rd 76
3rd 85
3rd 99
raiders picking 36
would you trade down with the steelers for pick 56 and 76 ???
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,588
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 626 times
- Received High Fives: 562 times
If we think Meredith can stop the likes of Leonard Williams or any of the elite DTs that go select a slot corner.
Personally I only see him getting pancaked.
Personally I only see him getting pancaked.
-
BoKnows81
- Posts: 7,282
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 920 times
- Received High Fives: 2152 times
God I hope not. That would be absolute terrible value and especially over who is guaranteed to be there.Southshield wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:29 am hearing way too much chatter about Stukes as the 2nd round pick for my liking.
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,703
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1864 times
- Received High Fives: 1150 times
I wonder if we jump Buffalo to get MCDonald. It looked like Buffalo strategically traded to just above us for a reason.
- mranquales
- Posts: 8,559
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
- Has given High Fives: 889 times
- Received High Fives: 292 times
The way Spytek spoke after the first-round interview, I think we might go offensive line in the second.
- These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post:
- KillerRaider30