Walker looks lost
- BoJacksonRules
- Posts: 2,698
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
- Has given High Fives: 341 times
- Received High Fives: 162 times
Walker looks lost
I’m just a fan, but this dude looks like he has no instincts out there. Probably just better having him blitz if they’re going to have him on the field. Do you all think he’s good, serviceable or what? Ditto my comments for Stokes
- These users gave a High Five to the author BoJacksonRules for the post:
- RI RAIDER
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,151
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 531 times
- Received High Fives: 223 times
Shiet, they need to triple up. I, we all been screaming for DT’s the past couple years & got none. Except Wilkins but, we don’t need to talk about that.Be_Easy_25 wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 4:31 am Yes.
Wondering if we should double up this offseason.
Sign a DT (Buckner or Payne) and draft the best DT in the draft.
Getting those two, even tho a bit older (Buckner), would go a long way to not pigeonholing the team into DT at anyone one spot. Because as bad as I want multiple DT’s & a shitkicking DL, they desperately need a good boundary WR &, this draft is great for in the 1st round. Raiders need that as bad as DTs.
- RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,401
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 156 times
- Received High Fives: 788 times
I looked up Christian Wilkins and cannot find any resolution for his grievance but it says this: In total, Wilkins received $49.7 million of his original contract, playing in just five games for the Raiders. Raiders signed Wilkins to a four-year deal worth $110 million, with $84.75 million guaranteed.He played in just five games for the Raiders so he go $10 million per game. Wilkins and major head case Chandler Jones were hopefully the bottoming out of our beloved franchise. Wilkins was 2024-25 (just last year and it feels like five years ago). Jones was 2023. We have signed so many free agent busts and problems!Diesis wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 5:08 am Speaking of DTs, is there any news on the Wilkins compensation saga?
- These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 2):
- Diesis, Amish Cabal
- Rainman56
- Posts: 12,585
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
- Location: Underground
- Has given High Fives: 566 times
- Received High Fives: 374 times
I agree Walker hasn't looked good.....I think Chinn has been one of the best on our defense this season...His tackling has been exceptional imo.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rainman56 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,256
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 47 times
- Received High Fives: 453 times
I've been messing around with mock drafts since the trade. And honestly unless there's a couple players there I trade down in the first and end up doubling up on DT and guard getting a wr and an edge
- These users gave a High Five to the author vtraider for the post (total 2):
- raider_kin, MexicanHulk
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,876
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1275 times
- Received High Fives: 3050 times
Ah, the magic "trade down" pill. So hard to do that with any certainty not knowing who is coming out, what was done in free agency and not knowing if other teams want to trade up and what they are willing to give for it.vtraider wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:45 pm I've been messing around with mock drafts since the trade. And honestly unless there's a couple players there I trade down in the first and end up doubling up on DT and guard getting a wr and an edge
-
MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,151
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 531 times
- Received High Fives: 223 times
I remember some on the board here saying how much Chinn sucks. It’s just Raiders fan bias. Mmhmm. Chinn never sucked & was always at least a solid starter. Still is. Hopefully he has another couple productive years like this left. So the Raiders can draft an heir apparent to team up with Stukes for the foreseeable future.Rainman56 wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 6:08 am I agree Walker hasn't looked good.....I think Chinn has been one of the best on our defense this season...His tackling has been exceptional imo.
- These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 2):
- raiderboyron, FLORIDARAYDAH
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,256
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 47 times
- Received High Fives: 453 times
True. It's not like I'm drafting for real though. It was more of an I'm focusing on what our current most pressing needs are.Attyla wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 1:49 pm Ah, the magic "trade down" pill. So hard to do that with any certainty not knowing who is coming out, what was done in free agency and not knowing if other teams want to trade up and what they are willing to give for it.
- raiderboyron
- Posts: 1,245
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:44 am
- Location: On the side of Lassen peak in beautiful Shasta Co
- Has given High Fives: 376 times
- Received High Fives: 186 times
Gotta remember Mex. It was "Trash" and "Garbage"!MexicanHulk wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 2:19 pm I remember some on the board here saying how much Chinn sucks. It’s just Raiders fan bias. Mmhmm. Chinn never sucked & was always at least a solid starter. Still is. Hopefully he has another couple productive years like this left. So the Raiders can draft an heir apparent to team up with Stukes for the foreseeable future.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raiderboyron for the post:
- Xramfan
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,876
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1275 times
- Received High Fives: 3050 times
If any of us are ever drafting for real, heaven help this franchise. Trading picks is tricky. And one of the reasons teams wait until the draft to even trade the first overall pick is there is so much late info that pops up that can move the needle. But this draft, I am not certain we want to move around much at least early in the draft. There are going to be a lot of receivers but the high end has some real gemsvtraider wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 2:49 pm True. It's not like I'm drafting for real though. It was more of an I'm focusing on what our current most pressing needs are.
-
raider_kin
- Posts: 4,448
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2725 times
- Received High Fives: 1198 times
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,806
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 44 times
- Received High Fives: 1500 times
Its almost like we will have three 3rd round picks next year!
Who knows what we have in him since he got hurt so early
- These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
- raider_kin
-
vtraider
- Posts: 8,256
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
- Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
- Has given High Fives: 47 times
- Received High Fives: 453 times
True. And the couple players that when I was messing around with it that I didn't trade down were a couple receivers and one DT. Even messing around with it I did notice that currently (and yes currently) that guard was top heavy dt you could find good ones down to the beginning of the fourth Rd. Wr the tip top is great. Then it goes to good after the first couple. But good ones can be had until the third Rd as well. It all depends on how the team feels about what needs are the biggest. I think we need a minimum of 2 dt, 2 guard, 1 edge (taking into account the one we drafted this year) and 1 wr though I would prefer 2. The ones needing 2 can be one high and 1 lower. But I think we should get 2 of them if at all possible.Attyla wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 2:58 pm If any of us are ever drafting for real, heaven help this franchise. Trading picks is tricky. And one of the reasons teams wait until the draft to even trade the first overall pick is there is so much late info that pops up that can move the needle. But this draft, I am not certain we want to move around much at least early in the draft. There are going to be a lot of receivers but the high end has some real gems
I do these just to goof off and it gives me names to check out that I am not too familiar with. Mostly offensive line since if you hear their name in a broadcast it means they screwed up.
- Viper
- Posts: 1,819
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
- Has given High Fives: 807 times
- Received High Fives: 970 times
You’re not alone, I too was messing around with mock drafts the last couple days, killing some time. It’s fun with the bonus of getting to know players early. I’ve been also looking at positions of need and a trade down, or up for that matter, can have good outcomes depending on the strength of your team heading into a draft. It’s not a one size fits all scenario.vtraider wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2026 7:00 pm True. And the couple players that when I was messing around with it that I didn't trade down were a couple receivers and one DT. Even messing around with it I did notice that currently (and yes currently) that guard was top heavy dt you could find good ones down to the beginning of the fourth Rd. Wr the tip top is great. Then it goes to good after the first couple. But good ones can be had until the third Rd as well. It all depends on how the team feels about what needs are the biggest. I think we need a minimum of 2 dt, 2 guard, 1 edge (taking into account the one we drafted this year) and 1 wr though I would prefer 2. The ones needing 2 can be one high and 1 lower. But I think we should get 2 of them if at all possible.
I do these just to goof off and it gives me names to check out that I am not too familiar with. Mostly offensive line since if you hear their name in a broadcast it means they screwed up.
- rcraider
- Posts: 1,048
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
- Has given High Fives: 364 times
- Received High Fives: 284 times
Problem with Crawford is he is coming off a torn Achilles, that type of injury usually takes longer to come back from, I haven't seen many that are effective the year after, especially at his position.
-
raider_kin
- Posts: 4,448
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2725 times
- Received High Fives: 1198 times
Damn I didn't know it was the Achillesrcraider wrote: Fri Nov 13, 2026 1:34 am Problem with Crawford is he is coming off a torn Achilles, that type of injury usually takes longer to come back from, I haven't seen many that are effective the year after, especially at his position.