Kirk Cousins (Traded to Vikings)

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Reno Hightower
Posts: 3,237
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 812 times
Received High Fives: 1219 times

Kirk Cousins (Traded to Vikings)

Unread post by Reno Hightower »

I have rarely seen a QB do more with less. Kubiak has made it clear that he is the guy this year but his play has really defied conventional wisdom. The run blocking is as putrid as it was last season. The pass blocking has been getting compliments but how much as that has to do with Cousins's pocket presence and pre snap reads?

I am not sure the subject deserves its own thread but I think what he has accomplished this season cannot be overstated and he has essentially put the offense on his back. I don't think anyone saw this coming.

Thoughts?...
These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post (total 3):
Rabidraider, Steve007, mranquales
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,364
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 900 times
Received High Fives: 2032 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

NoThanksSir wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:11 pm This narrative doesn't acknowledge the reality of Kirk Cousins the player. I think if he was better than sure we would have had the leverage some are suggesting we had. But both teams understand what he is, and no one else was going to start a bidding war to drive up his price. It's not some slam dunk they even make it to the conference championship with him.
The Raiders could of easily drove the price up. Again, not upset with it, I just think we could of squeezed more out of a desperate team.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 344 times
Received High Fives: 74 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

JRaider17 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:10 pm I think we would've gotten a 2nd if the Vikings didn't have to eat 10 million next year (which now we save).
Good point that 10 million is significant. Hmm, I’m not sure how I feel about this deal.
User avatar
RaidersFan
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2022 11:30 am
Received High Fives: 1 time

Unread post by RaidersFan »

JRaider17 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:10 pm I think we would've gotten a 2nd if the Vikings didn't have to eat 10 million next year (which now we save).
No, we would not, no team would give up a 2nd round pick for a 38-year-old player
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,518
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 345 times
Received High Fives: 870 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Minny has 2 3s, hopefully we got the higher one.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1263 times
Received High Fives: 3014 times

Unread post by Attyla »

They get a 38 year old with a noodle of an arm. Two weeks ago, I would have been thrilled with a fourth. Today I am pumped with a third
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 5,084
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 10 times
Received High Fives: 280 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:03 pm Not necessarily upset with the compensation BUT let's be honest, the Vikings had ZERO leverage. They were absolutely desperate. Glad it's Mendoza time but I dont think we got max value. But that's OK bc it's a win win.
Yes I thought we could’ve strong armed them a bit too but apparently they were also asking about Geno and Daniel jones so they may have had a budget and simply went elsewhere if we held out.

I would suspect this decision on our end has less to do with the trade package and more to do with staff feeling it’s time for Mendoza.

I have a hard time believing we intended to keep starting Kirk much longer… but were just too enticed by that sweet, sweet (late) 3rd round pick.

My guess is: Mendoza was starting one way or the other within the next couple weeks. For a 3rd round pick we’ll cement Seattle as the game it happens
These users gave a High Five to the author raiders93 for the post:
chucker
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,502
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 494 times
Received High Fives: 604 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:14 pm The Raiders could of easily drove the price up. Again, not upset with it, I just think we could of squeezed more out of a desperate team.
Yea I'm skeptical simply because of Kirk Cousins the player. 1-4 in the playoffs, even with that defense it's not a sure thing he can lead them to the promised land. But it's hard to say without being a fly on the wall, either way things are looking up.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoThanksSir for the post (total 2):
LayneStaley, chucker
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 344 times
Received High Fives: 74 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

NoThanksSir wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:11 pm This narrative doesn't acknowledge the reality of Kirk Cousins the player. I think if he was better than sure we would have had the leverage some are suggesting we had. But both teams understand what he is, and no one else was going to start a bidding war to drive up his price. It's not some slam dunk they even make it to the conference championship with him.
I don’t see it that way at all. Kirk Cousins is a really good qb and leader.

If we were in the Vikings position I would give up a 2nd. With Cousins the Vikings have a better team than our franchise has had since 2002.
These users gave a High Five to the author Steve007 for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 2067 times
Received High Fives: 1300 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

I was hoping for a #1 and #2 for Maxxx which would of given the Raiders two #1s, Two #2s and two #3s.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
Rainman56
User avatar
RaidersFan
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2022 11:30 am
Received High Fives: 1 time

Unread post by RaidersFan »

LayneStaley wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:16 pm Minny has 2 3s, hopefully we got the higher one.
We did not, Vikings gave the Raiders their own pick and Vikings kept the other 3rd round pick from the Eagles trade which is the highest pick, it sucks but honestly, I do not blame them, I would not give the highest pick for a 38 year old quarterback
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,502
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 494 times
Received High Fives: 604 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

Steve007 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:21 pm I don’t see it that way at all. Kirk Cousins is a really good qb and leader.

If we were in the Vikings position I would give up a 2nd. With Cousins the Vikings have a better team than our franchise has had since 2002.
Really good QBs fail to live up to expectations all the time. I'm not saying he's bad, but you're assertion that he's going to win them a Superbowl is a stretch. I think that is what factored into his value. He's 1-4 in the playoffs, will be a 1 year rental, and Minnesota is going into the tough portion of their schedule. Giving up a 2nd for a guy like Cousins will get you fired.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoThanksSir for the post (total 2):
Rainman56, chucker
User avatar
Steve007
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:36 am
Has given High Fives: 344 times
Received High Fives: 74 times

Unread post by Steve007 »

This isn’t 1995. Qbs can play into their 40’s. Cousins joined the worst team in the league and played at a very high level. With an average defense this team could easily be 6-3 or 7-2.

Peyton Manning was complete garbage in his last year, had the worst noodle arm ever and won a ring with a great defense. His leadership was still valuable even though he could no longer play. Cousins can actually still play.
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,502
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 494 times
Received High Fives: 604 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

Steve007 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:25 pm This isn’t 1995. Qbs can play into their 40’s. Cousins joined the worst team in the league and played at a very high level. With an average defense this team could easily be 6-3 or 7-2.

Peyton Manning was complete garbage in his last year, had the worst noodle arm ever and won a ring with a great defense. His leadership was still valuable even though he could no longer play. Cousins can actually still play.
You just compared Kirk Cousins to one of the greatest Quarterbacks of all time lol.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Bo Knows
Posts: 7,364
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 900 times
Received High Fives: 2032 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

NoThanksSir wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:23 pm Really good QBs fail to live up to expectations all the time. I'm not saying he's bad, but you're assertion that he's going to win them a Superbowl is a stretch. I think that is what factored into his value. He's 1-4 in the playoffs, will be a 1 year rental, and Minnesota is going into the tough portion of their schedule. Giving up a 2nd for a guy like Cousins will get you fired.
Giving up a 2nd round pick for a QB and winning the super bowl will get you a raise. And who's saying he's only a 1 year rental in Minnesota?
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Steve007
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,502
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 494 times
Received High Fives: 604 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 1:28 pm Giving up a 2nd round pick for a QB and winning the super bowl will get you a raise.
I don't think they make it out of the first round with Cousins lol
Post Reply