Kirk Cousins
- Reno Hightower
- Posts: 3,237
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
- Has given High Fives: 812 times
- Received High Fives: 1219 times
Kirk Cousins
I have rarely seen a QB do more with less. Kubiak has made it clear that he is the guy this year but his play has really defied conventional wisdom. The run blocking is as putrid as it was last season. The pass blocking has been getting compliments but how much as that has to do with Cousins's pocket presence and pre snap reads?
I am not sure the subject deserves its own thread but I think what he has accomplished this season cannot be overstated and he has essentially put the offense on his back. I don't think anyone saw this coming.
Thoughts?...
I am not sure the subject deserves its own thread but I think what he has accomplished this season cannot be overstated and he has essentially put the offense on his back. I don't think anyone saw this coming.
Thoughts?...
- These users gave a High Five to the author Reno Hightower for the post (total 3):
- Rabidraider, Steve007, mranquales
- Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,772
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 459 times
- Received High Fives: 458 times
Shouldn't take too much to make both teams happy. They need Cousin's and we could always use more picks. Make a deal. Let Mendoza's career get started and let Kirk play for a ring.
- Coach dd 11
- Posts: 1,006
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:18 am
- Has given High Fives: 3 times
- Received High Fives: 54 times
Before the day is over:
Miller = Gone, trade
JPJ = Gone, trade
Cousins = Gone, trade
Crosby = Gone, trade
Stokes = Gone, trade
Burford = Cut
Pola-Mao = Cut
Leonard = FIRED
Miller = Gone, trade
JPJ = Gone, trade
Cousins = Gone, trade
Crosby = Gone, trade
Stokes = Gone, trade
Burford = Cut
Pola-Mao = Cut
Leonard = FIRED
- FLORIDARAYDAH
- Posts: 8,214
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1045 times
- Received High Fives: 637 times
Um OK? Some day but not today.Coach dd 11 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 9:15 am Before the day is over:
Miller = Gone, trade
JPJ = Gone, trade
Cousins = Gone, trade
Crosby = Gone, trade
Stokes = Gone, trade
Burford = Cut
Pola-Mao = Cut
Leonard = FIRED
- UC__
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 8:49 pm
- Has given High Fives: 50 times
- Received High Fives: 10 times
Leeroy JenkinsCoach dd 11 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 9:15 am Before the day is over:
Miller = Gone, trade
JPJ = Gone, trade
Cousins = Gone, trade
Crosby = Gone, trade
Stokes = Gone, trade
Burford = Cut
Pola-Mao = Cut
Leonard = FIRED
- These users gave a High Five to the author UC__ for the post:
- raider_kin
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,800
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1255 times
- Received High Fives: 2997 times
Drugs are a helluva thing
- raiderjohn
- Posts: 762
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1 time
- Received High Fives: 110 times
Not sure who's left on the 53, we're going to have to call on some of us board members to suit up.Coach dd 11 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 9:15 am Before the day is over:
Miller = Gone, trade
JPJ = Gone, trade
Cousins = Gone, trade
Crosby = Gone, trade
Stokes = Gone, trade
Burford = Cut
Pola-Mao = Cut
Leonard = FIRED
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,792
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 236 times
- Received High Fives: 528 times
T-minus 180 minutes and counting.
This will be gravely disappointing if we dont move either, or preferably both of, KC and Crosby. After watching last night's Wentz futility and their season going down in flames, plus what other trades have yielded, I think Minnesota's 2nd is a bit too low, but I dont think we get their 1st straight up. It would have to be something like their 1st for KC+our 3rd, or KC for their 2nd and best 3rd round pick.
This will be gravely disappointing if we dont move either, or preferably both of, KC and Crosby. After watching last night's Wentz futility and their season going down in flames, plus what other trades have yielded, I think Minnesota's 2nd is a bit too low, but I dont think we get their 1st straight up. It would have to be something like their 1st for KC+our 3rd, or KC for their 2nd and best 3rd round pick.
- Coach dd 11
- Posts: 1,006
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:18 am
- Has given High Fives: 3 times
- Received High Fives: 54 times
LOL, I'd agree with that, but not the overall point.raiderjohn wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 9:56 am Not sure who's left on the 53, we're going to have to call on some of us board members to suit up.
Those guys should not be in the long term plans for the TEAM (except possibly Crosby).
Yet by the time we are actually good and have a complete roster build up it'll be 2 more years.
We are NOT making the playoffs this year and for those who think we can, you're delusional.
So the argument to start Mendoza to get him reps should apply to the others who are on the team. Then we get what we can for the older vets and save cap money to replace them.
Now cutting Burford and Palo-Mao and firing Leonard is just me taking a swipe at those players and coaches I don't personally like.
Miller's play has not been as good and he won't "improve" in the upcoming years. JPJ is clearly not in their favor and not playing so we should get what we can. The argument for Cousins is obvious as he won't be retained and we should give him a shot at a team if they call. Stokes is the only other piece of value I wouldn't keep moving forward and I'd try to get a pick out of him too that would allow McCoy and Masses and Luter more time.
I'd like to see Miller on a good team, Crosby too and have a shot to win, Cousins too for what he's done in his short time here. But again, they would all provide valuable cap space to the team and added picks to give the GM power to move and target guys in the upcoming draft and capital to target key free agents. That in my opinion, is what is best for this TEAM in the long run. While a life-long fan, I can wait one more year to start being "good" and making the playoffs.
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,792
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 236 times
- Received High Fives: 528 times
Well, you would need those OL players for the rest of this year for Mendoza's sake. Its Kirk and Crosby who are expendable now.
- SkullCrusher
- Posts: 12,036
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 495 times
- Received High Fives: 630 times
I feel this comes down to Brady and his Mendoza plan, which both Clink and Spy will be on that same page to.
If Brady still wants Mendoza to go through a specific program and that doesn't include playing right now, there's no way past that.
We don't know.
Less a ridiculous haul for Kirk.
If Brady still wants Mendoza to go through a specific program and that doesn't include playing right now, there's no way past that.
We don't know.
Less a ridiculous haul for Kirk.
- ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- Posts: 4,205
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 525 times
- Received High Fives: 676 times
- ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- Posts: 4,205
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 525 times
- Received High Fives: 676 times
I got love for both Miller and Crosby but if Miami offered me two first rounders for each of them, they're would be one way tickets to South Beach in each of their lockers. It's about improving Raiders future first and foremost.Coach dd 11 wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 10:13 am LOL, I'd agree with that, but not the overall point.
Those guys should not be in the long term plans for the TEAM (except possibly Crosby).
Yet by the time we are actually good and have a complete roster build up it'll be 2 more years.
We are NOT making the playoffs this year and for those who think we can, you're delusional.
So the argument to start Mendoza to get him reps should apply to the others who are on the team. Then we get what we can for the older vets and save cap money to replace them.
Now cutting Burford and Palo-Mao and firing Leonard is just me taking a swipe at those players and coaches I don't personally like.
Miller's play has not been as good and he won't "improve" in the upcoming years. JPJ is clearly not in their favor and not playing so we should get what we can. The argument for Cousins is obvious as he won't be retained and we should give him a shot at a team if they call. Stokes is the only other piece of value I wouldn't keep moving forward and I'd try to get a pick out of him too that would allow McCoy and Masses and Luter more time.
I'd like to see Miller on a good team, Crosby too and have a shot to win, Cousins too for what he's done in his short time here. But again, they would all provide valuable cap space to the team and added picks to give the GM power to move and target guys in the upcoming draft and capital to target key free agents. That in my opinion, is what is best for this TEAM in the long run. While a life-long fan, I can wait one more year to start being "good" and making the playoffs.
That said, this will never happen. A SB contender would be buying at this time and I'd gladly ship both to a playoff contending team, not named KC, if the compensation was right. But I'm not giving anyone away. We're not the farm team anymore..you want some of the Raiders talent to make a push..you gots to pay.. Minnesota
- Coach dd 11
- Posts: 1,006
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:18 am
- Has given High Fives: 3 times
- Received High Fives: 54 times
- WNYRAIDER
- Posts: 4,294
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 356 times
- Received High Fives: 430 times
....supposedly, sheffter just said that Minnesota is keyed in now on trying to make the trade for Kirk, based on my NFL channel background noise....Cruisin with Tooz wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 10:16 am Well, you would need those OL players for the rest of this year for Mendoza's sake. Its Kirk and Crosby who are expendable now.
