More wins than last year, Jets post game thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 16,381
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 196 times
Received High Fives: 434 times

More wins than last year, Jets post game thread

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

With the win in New York today. The 2026 Raiders have already passed the win total from last year. We all wanted improvement and now it’s official in the record books,
User avatar
Hawkeyes
Posts: 408
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 10:57 am
Has given High Fives: 23 times
Received High Fives: 77 times

Unread post by Hawkeyes »

Willmark wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 6:30 am What’s getting lost when we lose is the fact there is talent in this team.

When we win the detractors are saying “look at the level of our competition.”

Yet the same applies in reverse against the teams who have more talent than us.

It’s year 1, aside from the Pats let down we have played tough in almost every game. We’re playing the NFC West and AFC East, that’s unfortunate scheduling.
It sucks going through it, but it’s probably for the best we have this schedule this year when we are rebuilding. It gets the young players a lot of good high caliber reps and then when we expect to compete for the playoffs going forward the schedule should ease up.
These users gave a High Five to the author Hawkeyes for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,731
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 916 times
Received High Fives: 260 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 5:46 am my comment was more tongue in cheek. Our resident Jeanty champion used that same argument about power rankings.
I'm not against Washington at all just exposing what I believe is bias against Jeanty. It's OK to like Washington more but there's nothing objective about it.

If Jeanty had Washington's stats-- 25 carries for 3.3 ypc-- you would all state he had a terrible game.
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,712
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1234 times
Received High Fives: 2984 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 9:51 am I'm not against Washington at all just exposing what I believe is bias against Jeanty. It's OK to like Washington more but there's nothing objective about it.

If Jeanty had Washington's stats-- 25 carries for 3.3 ypc-- you would all state he had a terrible game.
No because I do not use a stat line as my final judgement with regards to a player. Stats are only part of the story. He is not running with the authority he had last year most of the year. Washington is a far lower draft pick so the expectations are lower. He ran a couple times very nicely, had a very good sweep and he had some duds.

But what you are doing, what you always do, is find any and all ways to solidify your beliefs.
User avatar
Nor_Cal_Raider
Posts: 854
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:31 am
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 84 times

Unread post by Nor_Cal_Raider »

The young db's are getting some good experience. A dominate DT next year would go a long way to improving the defense
User avatar
Xramfan
Snake3 Mile LyleThe AssassinGhostChuckyMad StorkFernando
Posts: 18,516
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 876 times
Received High Fives: 1738 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

Nor_Cal_Raider wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 10:08 am The young db's are getting some good experience. A dominate DT next year would go a long way to improving the defense
Agree. One dominant DT and a true WR1 could make things very interesting
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
SuperRaider
Posts: 717
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2024 6:01 am
Location: Belper;UK
Has given High Fives: 63 times
Received High Fives: 199 times

Unread post by SuperRaider »

Somebody should start a thread;
Washington vs Jeanty….

What I like about Washington is that he will fight for the extra yard even the blocking not there….where Jeanty is; if no hole he just goes down….
These users gave a High Five to the author SuperRaider for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Coach dd 11
Posts: 1,001
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:18 am
Has given High Fives: 3 times
Received High Fives: 52 times

Unread post by Coach dd 11 »

Xramfan wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 10:13 am Agree. One dominant DT and a true WR1 could make things very interesting
Ok, I would tend to agree with you all here and I took Boston in my 2nd pick this year, lol.

Yet, do you add just a good DT or do you add a scheme DT. Meaning do you draft a NG or a DT?
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,383
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 150 times
Received High Fives: 773 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Xramfan wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 10:13 am Agree. One dominant DT and a true WR1 could make things very interesting
...and a dominant guard.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 2):
KillerRaider30, RI RAIDER
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,906
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1172 times
Received High Fives: 1039 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Hawkeyes wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 9:37 am It sucks going through it, but it’s probably for the best we have this schedule this year when we are rebuilding. It gets the young players a lot of good high caliber reps and then when we expect to compete for the playoffs going forward the schedule should ease up.
Quite possible.

Get in there and take the lumps and dish some back.

None of are happy with the four game skid outside of those with ulterior motives. At the same time outside of the Pats had the ball bounced a different way or a mistake avoid etc? The results are different.

This is different than the decade of mediocrity under the Boy Wonder if for no other reason then organization is looking to the future and has a very good offensive mind pointing us in the right direction. That alone is huge. Klint hasn’t been perfect, no coach will ever be but he’s building something.

We’re 4-4. Could we be 2-6 if things went differently? Sure. We could also be 6-2 had things gone our way vs the chiefs and bills.

There is going to be mistakes and missed opportunities this year, that’s to be expected.

But if we can keep it going forward? That’s how teams are built.
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 8,186
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 1022 times
Received High Fives: 617 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

Hellbound wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 5:27 am Watch it without biased eyes. Glenn was getting hyped up and he was the one that tried to high 5 the official. The official didn't do it back, said something to the effect of "no" and just gave a smile. Nothing to see there imo
Yeah that was quite the reach to say he high fived him even for him.
User avatar
Nor_Cal_Raider
Posts: 854
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:31 am
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 84 times

Unread post by Nor_Cal_Raider »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 10:51 am ...and a dominant guard.
If Seattle doesn't sign Nelson, he'd be my primary FA addition. The draft wr and dt in the 1st two rounds.
These users gave a High Five to the author Nor_Cal_Raider for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, RI RAIDER
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,906
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 1172 times
Received High Fives: 1039 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Nor_Cal_Raider wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 11:24 am If Seattle doesn't sign Nelson, he'd be my primary FA addition. The draft wr and dt in the 1st two rounds.
As much as I wanted him, we might have a shot at him next year in FA.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
raider_kin
SnakeThe AssassinThe JudgeGhostMad StorkPurple Drank
Posts: 4,403
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2709 times
Received High Fives: 1181 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Willmark wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 8:38 am No disagreement there. He’s likely going into the HOF when he hangs up the headset.

That said? Every great NFL coach outside of maybe Lombardi has the game pass them by for a variety of reasons.
And hopefully he goes soon
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,731
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 916 times
Received High Fives: 260 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Attyla wrote: Mon Nov 02, 2026 9:55 am No because I do not use a stat line as my final judgement with regards to a player. Stats are only part of the story. He is not running with the authority he had last year most of the year. Washington is a far lower draft pick so the expectations are lower. He ran a couple times very nicely, had a very good sweep and he had some duds.

But what you are doing, what you always do, is find any and all ways to solidify your beliefs.
I would have no problem with Washington being a superstar. He just hasn't shown that he is. Subpar pass blocking, subpar pass catching , fumble issues and average runner.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,378
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1064 times
Received High Fives: 587 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Our lines are soft as puppy shit. We do look better as a team this year, but we are not going anywhere without fixing both. Also, we still do not know what we have in Mendoza. If we do not give him some reps (especially that we are playing for a feel good participation trophy), that would be a disaster. I am not saying just throw him to the wolves. He should (at a minimum) get a scripted series starting this week.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
pfish57
Post Reply