NFL Trade Deadline
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,460
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 345 times
- Received High Fives: 881 times
NFL Trade Deadline
Ok maybe this doesn’t need its own thread but the deadline is 5 weeks away. I know the next couple weeks will determine if we are buyers but let’s say we get to 5-2 do we make a move?
I really wish we still had Jakobi here but it sounds like a few guys might be available…
Brian Thomas Jr
Marvin Harrison Jr
Jerry Jeudy
Thoughts?
I really wish we still had Jakobi here but it sounds like a few guys might be available…
Brian Thomas Jr
Marvin Harrison Jr
Jerry Jeudy
Thoughts?
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,372
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1065 times
- Received High Fives: 590 times
^^^^I was only suggesting the Ram players because there is no way the Rams are resigning all of them. They have cap space but a significant portion of their roster are free agents. Many are still young, are studs, and play positions of need. I really did not look at the entire FA list because you are right (it will change when the time comes). I will guarantee that at least 2 of those Ram studs will be on a different team next season (why not ours).
- FLORIDARAYDAH
- Posts: 8,167
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1003 times
- Received High Fives: 617 times
I have been hearing this about the Rams for at least 5 years. They are all in this year and will be f[raiders_icon]cked for years. It still hadnt happened. Hell they added Myles Garrett after being supposedly in cap hell.RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 6:58 am ^^^^I was only suggesting the Ram players because there is no way the Rams are resigning all of them. They have cap space but a significant portion of their roster are free agents. Many are still young, are studs, and play positions of need. I really did not look at the entire FA list because you are right (it will change when the time comes). I will guarantee that at least 2 of those Ram studs will be on a different team next season (why not ours).
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,269
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 810 times
- Received High Fives: 1060 times
no such thing as cap hell...teams with creative gm's find a way to get thru it and still sign free agents...especially teams with rookie qbsFLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:04 am I have been hearing this about the Rams for at least 5 years. They are all in this year and will be f[raiders_icon]cked for years. It still hadnt happened. Hell they added Myles Garrett after being supposedly in cap hell.
byron young abd colbie turners r targets for any d line both are studs
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,372
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1065 times
- Received High Fives: 590 times
I never said they were in cap hell per say (in fact they have a lot of cap space). I said a big % of their roster are FA's. They are not going to be able to resign everyone and some of those studs will be on different teams next season. Just look it up for yourself.FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:04 am I have been hearing this about the Rams for at least 5 years. They are all in this year and will be f[raiders_icon]cked for years. It still hadnt happened. Hell they added Myles Garrett after being supposedly in cap hell.
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/pffs- ... 30302.html
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,269
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 810 times
- Received High Fives: 1060 times
good info thanks16 to 88 wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2026 3:53 pm Not entirely true regarding draft picks being a 50/50 proposition when it comes to drafting them.
If we base it on players drafted in rounds 1-3 who successfully become primary or quality starters and evaluate them by calculating whether a drafted prospect meets the standard as a starter during their rookie contract applying metrics such as…
Starting a majority of available games (typically 48 career starts over 4 seasons).
Sustaining a high percentage of total team snaps (usually 50% or higher).
Achieving performance metrics indicative of a quality starter rather than just hanging around on an active NFL roster.
Here are the approximate hit rates when it comes to the rounds 1-3. Obviously, they diminish as day 3 picks roll around…
Round 1
QB 35-46%
WR 64%
TE 73%
RB 60-67%
OT 73%
IOL 70-83%
DL/Edge 66%
LB 56%
DB 61%
Round 2
QB 10-12.8%
WR 40%
TE 25%
RB 32-40%
OT 33%
IOL 48-70%
DL/Edge 35%
LB 38%
DB 40%
Round 3
QB 2-7.5%
WR 22%
TE 12%
RB 20%
OT14%
IOL 51%
DL/Edge 18%
LB 20%
DB 20%
this is exactly why the rams trade off their picks for proven pro bowl type of players...you get proven high performance type players with experience vs unproven prospects that are at best 50/50 to be busts,avg,good,great
- FLORIDARAYDAH
- Posts: 8,167
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1003 times
- Received High Fives: 617 times
I wasn't calling you out. Just the general consensus that they sold their soul for a SB run and it hasnt happened. Looks like they won't have any trouble signing their big FAs by pushing the hits back a bit.RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:22 am I never said they were in cap hell per say (in fact they have a lot of cap space). I said a big % of their roster are FA's. They are not going to be able to resign everyone and some of those studs will be on different teams next season. Just look it up for yourself.
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/pffs- ... 30302.html
- STHfrontrow
- Posts: 1,025
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 46 times
- Received High Fives: 83 times
Bears acquired Tenn DT Simmons. The Raiders could’ve really used that guy.
- These users gave a High Five to the author STHfrontrow for the post:
- RI RAIDER
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,372
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1065 times
- Received High Fives: 590 times
Wow. Huge move. You would be hard pressed to find a bigger game changer on the defensive side of the ball than Simmons.STHfrontrow wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:35 am Bears acquired Tenn DT Simmons. The Raiders could’ve really used that guy.
-
mstrbass2000
- Posts: 2,269
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 810 times
- Received High Fives: 1060 times
buckner and simmons could have helped our defense big time...both proven playersSTHfrontrow wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:35 am Bears acquired Tenn DT Simmons. The Raiders could’ve really used that guy.
ps we need to kick the tires on josh downs wr colts he can be had for cheap maybe a 5th rd pick makes for a great slot wr
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,372
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1065 times
- Received High Fives: 590 times
Their goes another potential Maxx suitor. Come on Jerry. What the f[raiders_icon]ck are you waiting for?
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,665
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1240 times
- Received High Fives: 2957 times
The Saints are certainly the poster child for cap hell. Yes, it is a thing, and it has limited their ability to be players in free agency over the years with the exception of Carr getting his deal. They have spent the better part of 10 years pushing money around just to get under the cap.
Rams will find a way to resign most of the guys they want to keep and they have a lot of flexibility in how they do it.
As for us? 2012 was absolutely cap hell. We could not sign anyone of significance and we added to that by also not having much of a draft. This was all due to the old man, who knew he was dying, throwing everything against the wall in that one last chasing the ring and Huey' stupid move to get Palmer. We were not just bottom feeders in 2012, we struggled to get enough guys onto the roster. We moved the money around enough to get it right but if you look at the guys we signed it is a who's who of who the f[raiders_icon]ck it that? Losing guys like Michael Bush, who while not flashy was a good complementary back was completely due to the cap issues. We wrote more paper on one year deals than I could count. We were unable to resign Satele and Carlisle who were actually quite effective, particularly as run blockers.
Rams will find a way to resign most of the guys they want to keep and they have a lot of flexibility in how they do it.
As for us? 2012 was absolutely cap hell. We could not sign anyone of significance and we added to that by also not having much of a draft. This was all due to the old man, who knew he was dying, throwing everything against the wall in that one last chasing the ring and Huey' stupid move to get Palmer. We were not just bottom feeders in 2012, we struggled to get enough guys onto the roster. We moved the money around enough to get it right but if you look at the guys we signed it is a who's who of who the f[raiders_icon]ck it that? Losing guys like Michael Bush, who while not flashy was a good complementary back was completely due to the cap issues. We wrote more paper on one year deals than I could count. We were unable to resign Satele and Carlisle who were actually quite effective, particularly as run blockers.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
- FLORIDARAYDAH
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,665
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1240 times
- Received High Fives: 2957 times
Titans dead money is going to be hugeSTHfrontrow wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:35 am Bears acquired Tenn DT Simmons. The Raiders could’ve really used that guy.
- RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,370
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 142 times
- Received High Fives: 758 times
Guys like Simmons and Buckner are very unlikely to come to a team like ours. Wouldn’t it shock you if they had been traded to the Jets, Colts, Cardinals, or Saints? Hell, the last time I felt super positive about a trade acquisition might be all the way back to Ted Hendricks. That trade was made in August and we gave up our next two first round picks to Green Bay. We won three Super Bowls with The Stork playing LB/edge rusher.
- pfish57
- Posts: 8,768
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
- Has given High Fives: 373 times
- Received High Fives: 860 times
Simmons is a stud DT with a lot of tread left on the tires...we needed him desperately!RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 7:41 am Wow. Huge move. You would be hard pressed to find a bigger game changer on the defensive side of the ball than Simmons.
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,372
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1065 times
- Received High Fives: 590 times
pfish57 wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2026 8:03 am Simmons is a stud DT with a lot of tread left on the tires...we needed him desperately!
I would have loved Simmons because of his dominance and because it may be one of the toughest positions to fill (at least for us). That being said, we really should not be buyers at this point. However, we should be sellers (or at least talking to teams). Everyone on the roster should be available with the exception of St. Fernando and BB.