The Chargers Host Our Raiders Game Day Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Attyla
Gold JacketSnake3 Mile Lyle
Posts: 52,595
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1239 times
Received High Fives: 2977 times

The Chargers Host Our Raiders Game Day Thread

Unread post by Attyla »

Well, here is the first test of the season. We play the second half of the game day schedule.

Chargers are favored by 6.5 points

Over/Under is 43.5

Last game the Chargers got rocked by the Cardinals 26-14. The Raiders beat the Dolphins 27-13 in what could be considered a tune up game.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/ra ... s-3888467/

Enjoy the game ladies
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Yogi
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Atlasffa wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:02 pm
Think I heard someone say that Cousins is the 1st Raider QB to throw 3 TDs in his first 2 games of the season since Ken Stabler in 1976...hard to believe that was 50 years ago.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 3):
Atlasffa, Steve007, RI RAIDER
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2754 times

Unread post by chucker »

HesterLayes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm I haven’t went and rewatched..someone give me the reasoning the chargers were able to gain the yardage on the Herbert forward fumble.thanks
That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
HesterLayes, WNYRAIDER, RI RAIDER
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,690
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 348 times
Received High Fives: 828 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

raidersince63 wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm Think I heard someone say that Cousins is the 1st Raider QB to throw 3 TDs in his first 2 games of the season since Ken Stabler in 1976...hard to believe that was 50 years ago.
It's hard to believe under any circumstances lol
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

I can recall before there was instant replay/challenge. Refs would often consider that if the ball went forward as the QB's arm was hit, it was considered a forward pass and if it went backward it was deemed a fumble.

By no means an end-all for making calls/rulings on the field...but hey, it's all they had back in the day.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

HesterLayes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm I haven’t went and rewatched..someone give me the reasoning the chargers were able to gain the yardage on the Herbert forward fumble.thanks
Under normal playing conditions, a live fumble can be recovered and advanced by any player on either team. The strict restriction that stops a teammate from advancing a forward fumble only triggers under three specific scenarios:
It is 4th down.
It happens within the last two minutes of either half (or in overtime).
It occurs during a two-point or extra-point conversion attempt.
User avatar
Rabidraider
SnakeMan from MarsSeabass
Posts: 2,707
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1864 times
Received High Fives: 1148 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 8:20 pm Under normal playing conditions, a live fumble can be recovered and advanced by any player on either team. The strict restriction that stops a teammate from advancing a forward fumble only triggers under three specific scenarios:
It is 4th down.
It happens within the last two minutes of either half (or in overtime).
It occurs during a two-point or extra-point conversion attempt.
Holy roller rule....Snake and Casper says hi...

These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,013
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Rabidraider wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 8:23 pm Holy roller rule....Snake and Casper says hi...
Yep that's the rule created.
I'm surprised there isn't an footnote: Chargers are allowed unlimited forward advanced fumbles when playing the Raiders.
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
GhostMad StorkBig Ben
Posts: 3,293
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 793 times
Received High Fives: 391 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

Rabidraider wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 8:23 pm Holy roller rule....Snake and Casper says hi...

That video should HAVE to include the chicken reaction, it was beautiful reaction

That play by stabler, banaszak and casper was creative perfection
These users gave a High Five to the author ELCAraiderfan for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Rabidraider
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,633
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 667 times
Received High Fives: 353 times

Unread post by rich72 »

These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post (total 2):
Raiders Baby, Opoponax50
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 4,105
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 502 times
Received High Fives: 644 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

chucker wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:12 pm That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.
There was a play earlier where Stokes forced a fumble on Herbert, the ball went forward 8 yards where Hampton recovered for the Chargers. The refs brought the ball back to where Herbert fumbled behind the line of scrimmage almost like a sack. It was neither 4th down or within two minutes of the half if I’m remembering correctly..
User avatar
Curay7680
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:19 am
Has given High Fives: 735 times
Received High Fives: 38 times

Unread post by Curay7680 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 5:01 am Raiders by 12. :flex: :pirateflag:
Exactly that right on the Nose 26-14. :thumbsup:
These users gave a High Five to the author Curay7680 for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,920
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1508 times
Received High Fives: 1555 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Curay7680 wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 4:20 am Exactly that right on the Nose 26-14. :thumbsup:
I might even be able to do it again sometime within the next 40 years.
User avatar
WNYRAIDER
Posts: 4,244
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
Has given High Fives: 332 times
Received High Fives: 398 times

Unread post by WNYRAIDER »

DanKD wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:00 pm Some of you are just so miserable. We are 2-0 and at least at the moment our future is looking bright with a great young coach
...well sure, when you put it that way....
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,329
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 1064 times
Received High Fives: 585 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

chucker wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:12 pm That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.

We got the W so I am not complaining. Why did Klint not challenge the play. He took a time out. The challenge would have been our time out. That was poor decision making on his part (or whoever is in charge of that).
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 3):
chucker, Rabidraider, SkullCrusher
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,038
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2047 times
Received High Fives: 2754 times

Unread post by chucker »

RI RAIDER wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 5:58 am We got the W so I am not complaining. Why did Klint not challenge the play. He took a time out. The challenge would have been our time out. That was poor decision making on his part (or whoever is in charge of that).
Yes it seemed really stupid not to challenge that. Especially with just 4 minutes left in the game - it's worth burning a challenge when there are only 2 minutes remaining before you can't challenge anymore, even if you think it's a slim chance you win the challenge. I think the odds of winning the challenge were 50-50 at best, but that would easily be worth it.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
RI RAIDER
Post Reply