The Chargers Host Our Raiders Game Day Thread
-
Attyla
- Posts: 52,595
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1239 times
- Received High Fives: 2977 times
The Chargers Host Our Raiders Game Day Thread
Well, here is the first test of the season. We play the second half of the game day schedule.
Chargers are favored by 6.5 points
Over/Under is 43.5
Last game the Chargers got rocked by the Cardinals 26-14. The Raiders beat the Dolphins 27-13 in what could be considered a tune up game.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/ra ... s-3888467/
Enjoy the game ladies
Chargers are favored by 6.5 points
Over/Under is 43.5
Last game the Chargers got rocked by the Cardinals 26-14. The Raiders beat the Dolphins 27-13 in what could be considered a tune up game.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/ra ... s-3888467/
Enjoy the game ladies
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1231 times
Think I heard someone say that Cousins is the 1st Raider QB to throw 3 TDs in his first 2 games of the season since Ken Stabler in 1976...hard to believe that was 50 years ago.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 3):
- Atlasffa, Steve007, RI RAIDER
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,038
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2047 times
- Received High Fives: 2754 times
That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.HesterLayes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm I haven’t went and rewatched..someone give me the reasoning the chargers were able to gain the yardage on the Herbert forward fumble.thanks
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
- HesterLayes, WNYRAIDER, RI RAIDER
- pfish57
- Posts: 8,690
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
- Has given High Fives: 348 times
- Received High Fives: 828 times
It's hard to believe under any circumstances lolraidersince63 wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm Think I heard someone say that Cousins is the 1st Raider QB to throw 3 TDs in his first 2 games of the season since Ken Stabler in 1976...hard to believe that was 50 years ago.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 2,431
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 1458 times
- Received High Fives: 1231 times
I can recall before there was instant replay/challenge. Refs would often consider that if the ball went forward as the QB's arm was hit, it was considered a forward pass and if it went backward it was deemed a fumble.
By no means an end-all for making calls/rulings on the field...but hey, it's all they had back in the day.
By no means an end-all for making calls/rulings on the field...but hey, it's all they had back in the day.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
- Rabidraider
- SkullCrusher
- Posts: 12,013
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 483 times
- Received High Fives: 624 times
Under normal playing conditions, a live fumble can be recovered and advanced by any player on either team. The strict restriction that stops a teammate from advancing a forward fumble only triggers under three specific scenarios:HesterLayes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:09 pm I haven’t went and rewatched..someone give me the reasoning the chargers were able to gain the yardage on the Herbert forward fumble.thanks
It is 4th down.
It happens within the last two minutes of either half (or in overtime).
It occurs during a two-point or extra-point conversion attempt.
-
Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,707
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1864 times
- Received High Fives: 1148 times
Holy roller rule....Snake and Casper says hi...SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 8:20 pm Under normal playing conditions, a live fumble can be recovered and advanced by any player on either team. The strict restriction that stops a teammate from advancing a forward fumble only triggers under three specific scenarios:
It is 4th down.
It happens within the last two minutes of either half (or in overtime).
It occurs during a two-point or extra-point conversion attempt.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
- Dr Death
- SkullCrusher
- Posts: 12,013
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 483 times
- Received High Fives: 624 times
Yep that's the rule created.
I'm surprised there isn't an footnote: Chargers are allowed unlimited forward advanced fumbles when playing the Raiders.
-
ELCAraiderfan
- Posts: 3,293
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
- Has given High Fives: 793 times
- Received High Fives: 391 times
That video should HAVE to include the chicken reaction, it was beautiful reaction
That play by stabler, banaszak and casper was creative perfection
- These users gave a High Five to the author ELCAraiderfan for the post (total 2):
- Dr Death, Rabidraider
- rich72
- Posts: 8,633
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
- Has given High Fives: 667 times
- Received High Fives: 353 times
- These users gave a High Five to the author rich72 for the post (total 2):
- Raiders Baby, Opoponax50
- ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- Posts: 4,105
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 502 times
- Received High Fives: 644 times
There was a play earlier where Stokes forced a fumble on Herbert, the ball went forward 8 yards where Hampton recovered for the Chargers. The refs brought the ball back to where Herbert fumbled behind the line of scrimmage almost like a sack. It was neither 4th down or within two minutes of the half if I’m remembering correctly..chucker wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:12 pm That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.
- Curay7680
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:19 am
- Has given High Fives: 735 times
- Received High Fives: 38 times
Exactly that right on the Nose 26-14.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Curay7680 for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,920
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1508 times
- Received High Fives: 1555 times
I might even be able to do it again sometime within the next 40 years.
- WNYRAIDER
- Posts: 4,244
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 332 times
- Received High Fives: 398 times
...well sure, when you put it that way....DanKD wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:00 pm Some of you are just so miserable. We are 2-0 and at least at the moment our future is looking bright with a great young coach
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,329
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 1064 times
- Received High Fives: 585 times
chucker wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:12 pm That's the way the rule works, other than on 4th down or in the last two minutes of a half. I think we should have challenged the ruling of a fumble vs incomplete pass though.
We got the W so I am not complaining. Why did Klint not challenge the play. He took a time out. The challenge would have been our time out. That was poor decision making on his part (or whoever is in charge of that).
- These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 3):
- chucker, Rabidraider, SkullCrusher
-
chucker
- Posts: 17,038
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 2047 times
- Received High Fives: 2754 times
Yes it seemed really stupid not to challenge that. Especially with just 4 minutes left in the game - it's worth burning a challenge when there are only 2 minutes remaining before you can't challenge anymore, even if you think it's a slim chance you win the challenge. I think the odds of winning the challenge were 50-50 at best, but that would easily be worth it.RI RAIDER wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2026 5:58 am We got the W so I am not complaining. Why did Klint not challenge the play. He took a time out. The challenge would have been our time out. That was poor decision making on his part (or whoever is in charge of that).