Gentleman I don't want to curse them...But

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,714
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 354 times
Received High Fives: 842 times

Gentleman I don't want to curse them...But

Unread post by pfish57 »

I think we Finally have a legitimate coaching staff, and that's the difference between shit & honey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Raiders this is first time Iv'e been Raider motivated in 23 f[raiders_icon]cking years & it feels Good!!!!
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 8):
Dr Death, The Real CK, Rainman56, RaiderandBulldog, ELCAraiderfan, mranquales, The Silver Pillager, 3rd and Long
User avatar
Raidernation1979
The AssassinFernando
Posts: 8,314
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 298 times
Received High Fives: 829 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

Jeevo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:33 pm Me too. If I’m going Wildcat though I’d just bring on another big body and take Cousins out.
Setting the play up for 6’5” Mendo to get single coverage and catch a jump ball TD. :rofl:
These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
Jeevo
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Going for it on 4th down was fine but going "wildcat" before the half and having Cousins split out wide as a receiver wasn't going to fool anyone, and it didn't. And even if Jeanty had not bobbled the snap, I'm not so sure it would have made a difference.

And instead of Jeanty, why not Washington or Heyward in that situation?
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
Vercingetorix
User avatar
Hawkeyes
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 10:57 am
Has given High Fives: 23 times
Received High Fives: 76 times

Unread post by Hawkeyes »

The only issue I had with coaching today was not challenging the Herbert “fumble”. Overall very happy. I know there are going to be weeks we don’t look good, and we still have a team with a lot to learn. But as long as the coaching staff is given time and patience this team will get better every year.

Imagine next year when the team hits mini camp already knowing the offense and defense, the plays, what expectations are, what we are trying to accomplish instead of trying to learn an all new system and coaching staff. They can show up focused on making tweaks and improvements instead of starting from scratch. That alone is going to put us months ahead in development from where we normally are.That stability is something we’ve been missing for decades.
These users gave a High Five to the author Hawkeyes for the post (total 6):
chucker, mranquales, Reno Hightower, ELCAraiderfan, WNYRAIDER, powski
User avatar
chucker
Gold JacketThe JudgeBowersFernando
Posts: 17,042
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 2053 times
Received High Fives: 2762 times

Unread post by chucker »

Hawkeyes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:40 pm The only issue I had with coaching today was not challenging the Herbert “fumble”. Overall very happy. I know there are going to be weeks we don’t look good, and we still have a team with a lot to learn. But as long as the coaching staff is given time and patience this team will get better every year.

Imagine next year when the team hits mini camp already knowing the offense and defense, the plays, what expectations are, what we are trying to accomplish instead of trying to learn an all new system and coaching staff. They can show up focused on making tweaks and improvements instead of starting from scratch. That alone is going to put us months ahead in development from where we normally are.That stability is something we’ve been missing for decades.
They definitely should have challenged that fumble - there wasn't much time left so there was nothing to save challenges for and the Raiders called timeout anyway so it would have cost them nothing if wrong. There was also a first down for the Chargers that could have been worth a challenge.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
Jeevo, ELCAraiderfan
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 2,431
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 1458 times
Received High Fives: 1231 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

pfish57 wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 4:36 pm I think we Finally have a legitimate coaching staff, and that's the difference between shit & honey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Raiders this is first time Iv'e been Raider motivated in 23 f[raiders_icon]cking years & it feels Good!!!!
It's been a long journey but it appears that your transition from the "Dark Side" side is nearly complete, if so,...Welcome to the "Silver and Black" side.
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,714
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 354 times
Received High Fives: 842 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

Overall the players just seem to have their shit together which we all know has been scarce for 23 years, so that tells me it;s a coaching thing:)
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,652
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1388 times

Unread post by DanKD »

chucker wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:43 pm They definitely should have challenged that fumble - there wasn't much time left so there was nothing to save challenges for and the Raiders called timeout anyway so it would have cost them nothing if wrong. There was also a first down for the Chargers that could have been worth a challenge.
Yep, rookie coach mistake. Hopefully he recognizes that and improves on the challenges
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,014
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 484 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

mranquales wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:13 pm The Raiders were the master at taking 3 for the last 2 decades,
It's not about the past, smart football is smart football.
That 3 could have mattered, esp 20-14 in the 4th. 23-14 a lot more attractive.
We were the masters of open field punting.
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,804
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 811 times
Received High Fives: 945 times

Unread post by Viper »

Hawkeyes wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:40 pm The only issue I had with coaching today was not challenging the Herbert “fumble”. Overall very happy. I know there are going to be weeks we don’t look good, and we still have a team with a lot to learn. But as long as the coaching staff is given time and patience this team will get better every year.

Imagine next year when the team hits mini camp already knowing the offense and defense, the plays, what expectations are, what we are trying to accomplish instead of trying to learn an all new system and coaching staff. They can show up focused on making tweaks and improvements instead of starting from scratch. That alone is going to put us months ahead in development from where we normally are.That stability is something we’ve been missing for decades.
We get new players every year through the draft and FA. It would be a bonus having players that have been here and can help the new players during camp, practices, extra coaches so to speak.
User avatar
3rd and Long
Posts: 1,030
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:26 am
Has given High Fives: 46 times
Received High Fives: 70 times

Unread post by 3rd and Long »

I'm not going to overreact about 2 wins, but we're definitely going to win the Superbowl this year
These users gave a High Five to the author 3rd and Long for the post (total 11):
chucker, Opoponax50, mranquales, Trainnvain, raiderboyron, Pfish252000, GoodTimeCharlie, Owsley Stanley, FlyBono24, Dr Death and one more user
User avatar
Curay7680
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:19 am
Has given High Fives: 749 times
Received High Fives: 39 times

Unread post by Curay7680 »

pfish57 wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 4:36 pm I think we Finally have a legitimate coaching staff, and that's the difference between shit & honey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go Raiders this is first time Iv'e been Raider motivated in 23 f[raiders_icon]cking years & it feels Good!!!!
:thumbsup:
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,330
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1778 times
Received High Fives: 682 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:53 pm It's not about the past, smart football is smart football.
That 3 could have mattered, esp 20-14 in the 4th. 23-14 a lot more attractive.
We were the masters of open field punting.
The Raiders forced a punt from the Chargers 4 yard line that resulted in a touchdown after said punt. Pinning the Chargers deep resulted in a touchdown for the Raiders on great field position... So either way, they got the TD.
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 5):
chucker, Opoponax50, mranquales, Steve007, raidersince63
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,548
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 5 times
Received High Fives: 231 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

Attyla wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 4:46 pm We beat two teams that have not won a game

see me later
What caught my attention was how Arizona and Miami both got DESTROYED today.
At least we know of the 4 teams... we are the best of the 4.
Got that going for us.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,652
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 1388 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Raider_Dave wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 7:47 pm What caught my attention was how Arizona and Miami both got DESTROYED today.
At least we know of the 4 teams... we are the best of the 4.
Got that going for us.
Chargers look like absolute shit. This is looking like it could be a 5 win team or so for them.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 12,014
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 484 times
Received High Fives: 624 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:59 pm The Raiders forced a punt from the Chargers 4 yard line that resulted in a touchdown after said punt. Pinning the Chargers deep resulted in a touchdown for the Raiders on great field position... So either way, they got the TD.
Yah well that's a lot of random unknowns after the fact. I'm surprised more people don't get this.
Get lead.
That 3 could be the difference later in a variety of scoring combos.
We could have scored 7 the next drive and been up 2 scores.

What if:
If we are up 7 do you kick 3 to go up two scores on a 4th and short?
Post Reply